[Bug 966630] Review Request: openstack-java-sdk - OpenStack Java SDK
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966630 Federico Simoncelli changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(fsimonce@redhat.c | |om) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZMMZYYO3GB3OLUYYZ6HHBJIO7MFQ5MKG/
[Bug 966630] Review Request: openstack-java-sdk - OpenStack Java SDK
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966630 Mikolaj Izdebski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|mizde...@redhat.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #6 from Mikolaj Izdebski --- Submitter unresponsive. Reassigning to nobody. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 966630] Review Request: openstack-java-sdk - OpenStack Java SDK
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966630 Matthias Runge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||mru...@redhat.com Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2014-04-29 06:58:17 --- Comment #7 from Matthias Runge --- bodhi -L openstack-java-sdk: f19-updates-candidate openstack-java-sdk-3.0.4-1.fc19 f19-updates openstack-java-sdk-3.0.2-1.fc19 f19-updates-testing openstack-java-sdk-3.0.2-1.fc19 f20-updates-candidate openstack-java-sdk-3.0.4-1.fc20 f20-updates-testing openstack-java-sdk-3.0.2-1.fc20 f20-updates openstack-java-sdk-3.0.2-1.fc20 It looks imported, built and pushed. Closing this one. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 966630] Review Request: openstack-java-sdk - OpenStack Java SDK
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966630 Mikolaj Izdebski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fsimo...@redhat.com Flags||needinfo?(fsimonce@redhat.c ||om) --- Comment #5 from Mikolaj Izdebski --- What's the status of this bug? If there are no problems with the package then please close this bug with resolution NEXTRELEASE. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=YL7wdRcnb0&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 966630] Review Request: openstack-java-sdk - OpenStack Java SDK
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966630 Mikolaj Izdebski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mizde...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=9ByYABP5Cr&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 966630] Review Request: openstack-java-sdk - OpenStack Java SDK
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966630 --- Comment #1 from Federico Simoncelli --- SRPM URL: http://fsimonce.fedorapeople.org/openstack-java-sdk/openstack-java-sdk-3.0.0-0.0.git10597f7.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Qo9Ed5ZpT3&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 966630] Review Request: openstack-java-sdk - OpenStack Java SDK
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966630 Federico Simoncelli changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Federico Simoncelli --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: openstack-java-sdk Short Description: OpenStack Java SDK Owners: fsimonce Branches: f18 f19 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=btduXXFSBA&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 966630] Review Request: openstack-java-sdk - OpenStack Java SDK
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966630
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Mikolaj Izdebski ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [-] = Not applicable
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Java:
[x]: Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[x]: Javadoc subpackages should not have Requires: jpackage-utils
[x]: Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlink)
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
Maven:
[x]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even
when building with ant
[x]: Pom files have correct Maven mapping
[x]: Maven packages should use new style packaging
[x]: Old add_to_maven_depmap macro is not being used
[x]: Packages DOES NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-
utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
[x]: Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x]: Packages use %{_mavenpomdir} instead of %{_datadir}/maven2/poms
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original inst
[Bug 966630] Review Request: openstack-java-sdk - OpenStack Java SDK
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966630 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=IAeaUBftQH&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 966630] Review Request: openstack-java-sdk - OpenStack Java SDK
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966630 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=7qwgoe7smf&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
