[Bug 972352] Review Request: jsendnsca - Java API for sending passive checks to the Nagios NSCA add-on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972352 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2016-08-27 06:15:50 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 972352] Review Request: jsendnsca - Java API for sending passive checks to the Nagios NSCA add-on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972352 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- jsendnsca-2.1.1-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 972352] Review Request: jsendnsca - Java API for sending passive checks to the Nagios NSCA add-on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972352 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- jsendnsca-2.1.1-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-67770cccb0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 972352] Review Request: jsendnsca - Java API for sending passive checks to the Nagios NSCA add-on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972352 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- jsendnsca-2.1.1-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-67770cccb0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 972352] Review Request: jsendnsca - Java API for sending passive checks to the Nagios NSCA add-on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972352 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 972352] Review Request: jsendnsca - Java API for sending passive checks to the Nagios NSCA add-on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972352 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/jsendnsca -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 972352] Review Request: jsendnsca - Java API for sending passive checks to the Nagios NSCA add-on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972352 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 972352] Review Request: jsendnsca - Java API for sending passive checks to the Nagios NSCA add-on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972352 --- Comment #9 from gil cattaneo --- (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #8) > BuildRequires: hostname, > then you can remove the "-Dmaven.test.failure.ignore=true". It builds fine. Done > Looks all good, except for the two small issues noted at the top. Package is > APPROVED. Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jsendnsca.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jsendnsca-2.1.1-1.fc24.src.rpm Thanks for the review! create new SCM requests: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/7349 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/7350 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 972352] Review Request: jsendnsca - Java API for sending passive checks to the Nagios NSCA add-on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972352 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zbys...@in.waw.pl Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- BuildRequires: hostname, then you can remove the "-Dmaven.test.failure.ignore=true". It builds fine. %description should be wrapped to 80 columns. Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated = MUST items = Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. ASL 2.0. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache (v2.0)". 5 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /var/tmp/972352-jsendnsca/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. (see note at the top) [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Java: [x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build [x]: Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils Note: Maven packages do not need to (Build)Require jpackage-utils. It is pulled in by maven-local [x]: Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc subpackage [x]: Javadoc subpackages should not have Requires: jpackage-utils [x]: Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlink) Maven: [x]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including metadata) even when building with ant [x]: POM files have correct Maven mapping [x]: Maven packages should use new style packaging [x]: Old add_to_maven_depmap macro is not being used [x]: Packages DO NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage- utils for %update_maven_depmap m
[Bug 972352] Review Request: jsendnsca - Java API for sending passive checks to the Nagios NSCA add-on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972352 --- Comment #7 from gil cattaneo --- Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jsendnsca.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jsendnsca-2.1.1-1.fc23.src.rpm Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13486055 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 972352] Review Request: jsendnsca - Java API for sending passive checks to the Nagios NSCA add-on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972352 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 972352] Review Request: jsendnsca - Java API for sending passive checks to the Nagios NSCA add-on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972352 --- Comment #6 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- gil's scratch build of jsendnsca-2.0.1-1.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11727013 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 972352] Review Request: jsendnsca - Java API for sending passive checks to the Nagios NSCA add-on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972352 --- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo --- Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jsendnsca.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jsendnsca-2.0.1-1.fc23.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 972352] Review Request: jsendnsca - Java API for sending passive checks to the Nagios NSCA add-on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972352 --- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo --- Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jsendnsca.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jsendnsca-2.0.1-1.fc22.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 972352] Review Request: jsendnsca - Java API for sending passive checks to the Nagios NSCA add-on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972352 --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- gil's scratch build of jsendnsca-2.0.1-1.fc22.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11241911 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 972352] Review Request: jsendnsca - Java API for sending passive checks to the Nagios NSCA add-on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972352 --- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo --- NOTE: https://github.com/jsendnsca/jsendnsca is a placeholder for porting the existing Google Code project -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 972352] Review Request: jsendnsca - Java API for sending passive checks to the Nagios NSCA add-on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972352 --- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo --- Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jsendnsca.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jsendnsca-2.0.1-1.fc20.src.rpm Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8796882 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 972352] Review Request: jsendnsca - Java API for sending passive checks to the Nagios NSCA add-on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972352 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||968136 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=OgnDC730md&a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review