[Bug 973349] Review Request: checksec - Tool to check system for binary-hardening
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973349 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|checksec-1.5-2.el6 |checksec-1.5-2.fc19 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- checksec-1.5-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=VMKNiqYqDQa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 973349] Review Request: checksec - Tool to check system for binary-hardening
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973349 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|checksec-1.5-2.el5 |checksec-1.5-2.el6 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- checksec-1.5-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=PkNhL91EIva=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 973349] Review Request: checksec - Tool to check system for binary-hardening
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973349 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|checksec-1.5-2.fc18 |checksec-1.5-2.el5 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- checksec-1.5-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=WCDS0xsWp1a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 973349] Review Request: checksec - Tool to check system for binary-hardening
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973349 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||checksec-1.5-1.fc18 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-06-13 02:11:17 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- checksec-1.5-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=OLEBUQY0ORa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 973349] Review Request: checksec - Tool to check system for binary-hardening
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973349 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|checksec-1.5-1.fc18 |checksec-1.5-1.fc19 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- checksec-1.5-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=uIumy1h8DTa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 973349] Review Request: checksec - Tool to check system for binary-hardening
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973349 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|checksec-1.5-1.fc19 |checksec-1.5-2.fc18 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- checksec-1.5-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Cwft3IIPT3a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 973349] Review Request: checksec - Tool to check system for binary-hardening
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973349 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=886zuuH2pCa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 973349] Review Request: checksec - Tool to check system for binary-hardening
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973349 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=dK40Nu3AZga=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 973349] Review Request: checksec - Tool to check system for binary-hardening
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973349 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- checksec-1.5-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/checksec-1.5-2.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=g96xspkpBta=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 973349] Review Request: checksec - Tool to check system for binary-hardening
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973349 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- checksec-1.5-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/checksec-1.5-2.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=FxJHoYpQT1a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 973349] Review Request: checksec - Tool to check system for binary-hardening
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973349 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- checksec-1.5-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/checksec-1.5-2.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=lPyRWxxDeHa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 973349] Review Request: checksec - Tool to check system for binary-hardening
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973349 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- checksec-1.5-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/checksec-1.5-2.el5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Od81NArHV3a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 973349] Review Request: checksec - Tool to check system for binary-hardening
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973349 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- checksec-1.5-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=F7vqQ3DUbea=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 973349] Review Request: checksec - Tool to check system for binary-hardening
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973349
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
||m
Flags||fedora-review+
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
||m
--- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
$ rpmlint -i -v *
checksec.src: I: checking
checksec.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Mitigations -
Mitigation, Mitigation's, Mitigation s
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
checksec.src: I: checking-url http://www.trapkit.de/tools/checksec.html
(timeout 10 seconds)
checksec.src: I: checking-url http://www.trapkit.de/tools/checksec_changes.txt
(timeout 10 seconds)
checksec.src: I: checking-url http://www.trapkit.de/tools/checksec.sh (timeout
10 seconds)
checksec.noarch: I: checking
checksec.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Mitigations -
Mitigation, Mitigation's, Mitigation s
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
checksec.noarch: I: checking-url http://www.trapkit.de/tools/checksec.html
(timeout 10 seconds)
checksec.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary checksec
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.
checksec.spec: I: checking-url http://www.trapkit.de/tools/checksec_changes.txt
(timeout 10 seconds)
checksec.spec: I: checking-url http://www.trapkit.de/tools/checksec.sh (timeout
10 seconds)
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
Nothing of interest so far.
-
key:
[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-
[+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces. The output should be posted in the review.
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
BSD
[+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use sha256sum for this task as it
is used by the sources file once imported into git. If no upstream URL can be
specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to
deal with this.
$ sha256sum *
77b8a7fd9393d10def665658a41176ee745d5c7969a4a0f43cefcc8a4cd90947
checksec.sh
77b8a7fd9393d10def665658a41176ee745d5c7969a4a0f43cefcc8a4cd90947
checksec.sh.packaged
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line.
[.] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for
any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
[.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
[.] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker.
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a
[Bug 973349] Review Request: checksec - Tool to check system for binary-hardening
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973349 Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com --- Thanks for reviewing, Mario! If I can take a review for you in return, just let me know. # New Package SCM Request === Package Name: checksec Short Description: Tool to check system for binary-hardening Owners: besser82 Branches: f19 f18 el6 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Crz25hTni3a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 973349] Review Request: checksec - Tool to check system for binary-hardening
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973349 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags||fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=0X1mRvSXoXa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 973349] Review Request: checksec - Tool to check system for binary-hardening
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973349 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=N40iCAKbfwa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 973349] Review Request: checksec - Tool to check system for binary-hardening
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973349 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- checksec-1.5-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/checksec-1.5-1.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=oiSBdP9L16a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 973349] Review Request: checksec - Tool to check system for binary-hardening
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973349 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=9Ux0LmGR1da=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 973349] Review Request: checksec - Tool to check system for binary-hardening
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973349 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- checksec-1.5-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/checksec-1.5-1.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=EySNeCdhIia=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 973349] Review Request: checksec - Tool to check system for binary-hardening
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973349 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- checksec-1.5-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/checksec-1.5-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=HZWjQMUCSHa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 973349] Review Request: checksec - Tool to check system for binary-hardening
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973349 Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ | Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com --- Just forgot to request el5, too. # Package Change Request == Package Name: checksec New Branches: el5 Owners: besser82 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=qOUxz4aEGpa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
