[Bug 975313] Review Request: libodb-boost - Boost ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975313 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|libodb-boost-2.2.1-1.fc20 |libodb-boost-2.2.1-1.el5 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- libodb-boost-2.2.1-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975313] Review Request: libodb-boost - Boost ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975313 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|libodb-boost-2.2.1-1.el5|libodb-boost-2.2.1-1.el6 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- libodb-boost-2.2.1-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975313] Review Request: libodb-boost - Boost ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975313 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|libodb-boost-2.2.1-1.fc18 |libodb-boost-2.2.1-1.fc20 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- libodb-boost-2.2.1-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975313] Review Request: libodb-boost - Boost ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975313 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||libodb-boost-2.2.1-1.fc19 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-11-08 22:29:19 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- libodb-boost-2.2.1-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975313] Review Request: libodb-boost - Boost ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975313 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|libodb-boost-2.2.1-1.fc19 |libodb-boost-2.2.1-1.fc18 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- libodb-boost-2.2.1-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975313] Review Request: libodb-boost - Boost ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975313 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- libodb-boost-2.2.1-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libodb-boost-2.2.1-1.el5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975313] Review Request: libodb-boost - Boost ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975313 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- libodb-boost-2.2.1-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libodb-boost-2.2.1-1.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975313] Review Request: libodb-boost - Boost ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975313 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- libodb-boost-2.2.1-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libodb-boost-2.2.1-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975313] Review Request: libodb-boost - Boost ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975313 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- libodb-boost-2.2.1-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975313] Review Request: libodb-boost - Boost ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975313 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975313] Review Request: libodb-boost - Boost ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975313 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- libodb-boost-2.2.1-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libodb-boost-2.2.1-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975313] Review Request: libodb-boost - Boost ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975313 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- libodb-boost-2.2.1-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libodb-boost-2.2.1-1.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975313] Review Request: libodb-boost - Boost ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975313 Bug 975313 depends on bug 975312, which changed state. Bug 975312 Summary: Review Request: libodb - Common ODB runtime library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975312 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975313] Review Request: libodb-boost - Boost ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975313 Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: libodb-boost Short Description: Boost ODB runtime library from Code Synthesis Owners: daveisfera Branches: el5 el6 f18 f19 f20 InitialCC: peter -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975313] Review Request: libodb-boost - Boost ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975313 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975313] Review Request: libodb-boost - Boost ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975313 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975313] Review Request: libodb-boost - Boost ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975313
--- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com ---
Looks good. Here is my formal
REVIEW:
Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable
+ rpmlint is silent
work ~/Desktop: rpmlint libodb-boost-*
libodb-boost.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) runtime - run time,
run-time, rudiment
libodb-boost.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) runtime - run time,
run-time, rudiment
^^^ False positives.
libodb-boost.x86_64: W: no-documentation
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
work ~/Desktop:
+ The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines.
+ The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license (strict
GPLv2).
+ The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included
in %doc.
+ The spec file is written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible.
+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
primary architecture. See Koji link above.
+ All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
0 No need to handle locales.
+ The package stores shared library files in some of the dynamic linker's
default paths, and it calls ldconfig in %post and %postun.
+ The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
0 The package is not designed to be relocatable.
+ The package owns all directories that it creates.
+ The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files
listings.
+ Permissions on files are set properly.
+ The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ The package consistently uses macros.
+ The package contains code, or permissible content.
0 No extremely large documentation files.
+ Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the
application. Well, since we're moving to unversioned docdirs this will
definitely cause issues. Please be careful with EL5 and EL6.
+ Header files are stored in a -devel package.
0 No static libraries.
+ The pkgconfig(.pc) files are stored in a -devel package. A necessary runtime
requirement is picked up automatically in Fedora, but EL5 (and maybe even EL6)
will require explicit Requires: pkgconfig
+ The library file(s) that end in .so (without suffix) is(are) stored in a
-devel package.
+ The -devel package requires the base package using a fully versioned
dependency: Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
+ The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
0 Not a GUI application.
+ The package does not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
+ At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.
APPROVED.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975313] Review Request: libodb-boost - Boost ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975313 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975313] Review Request: libodb-boost - Boost ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975313 --- Comment #3 from Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com --- This package is ready to review and a scratch build against rawhide is available at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6028284 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975313] Review Request: libodb-boost - Boost ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975313 --- Comment #4 from Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com --- Sorry, I forgot to include the link to the current source RPM in the last comment. It can be found at: http://daveisfera.fedorapeople.org/odb_2.2/SRPMS/libodb-boost-2.2.1-1.el6.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975313] Review Request: libodb-boost - Boost ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975313 --- Comment #2 from Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com --- The updated files can be found at: Spec URL: http://daveisfera.fedorapeople.org/odb_2.2/specs/libodb-boost.spec SRPM URL: http://daveisfera.fedorapeople.org/odb_2.2/SRPMS/libodb-boost-2.2.1-1.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Pa0fBS4d2Wa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975313] Review Request: libodb-boost - Boost ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975313 Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||975312 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hpd6AecnQXa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975313] Review Request: libodb-boost - Boost ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975313 Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bjoern.es...@gmail.com Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=eY3klgWzG1a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 975313] Review Request: libodb-boost - Boost ODB runtime library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975313 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||lemen...@gmail.com Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lemen...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com --- Unblocking FE-NEEDSPONSOR - I've just sponsored Dave. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=RsI1GkWCgEa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
