[Bug 985087] Review Request: hadoop - A software platform for processing vast amounts of data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985087 Matthew Farrellee m...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||998521 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=O2V1WNrs1da=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 985087] Review Request: hadoop - A software platform for processing vast amounts of data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985087 Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mizde...@redhat.com --- Comment #18 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com --- For people that mentioned support for EPEL: Keep in mind that hadoop and multiple of its dependencies require Apache Maven, which is missing in EPEL. Adding Maven to EPEL is possible, but non-trivial as Maven with dependencies consists of more than 100 packages, most of which are missing in RHEL or EPEL, so adding hadoop to EPEL would require adding multiple new packages or porting it and dependencicies not to use Maven. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=MgArrnqWjUa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 985087] Review Request: hadoop - A software platform for processing vast amounts of data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985087 --- Comment #19 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Mikolaj Izdebski from comment #18) For people that mentioned support for EPEL: Keep in mind that hadoop and multiple of its dependencies require Apache Maven, which is missing in EPEL. Adding Maven to EPEL is possible, but non-trivial as Maven with dependencies consists of more than 100 packages, most of which are missing in RHEL or EPEL, so adding hadoop to EPEL would require adding multiple new packages or porting it and dependencicies not to use Maven. +1. We should first get it into Fedora, test it, get feedbacks, then moving focus to EPEL/RHE* -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=KjjucqDeeoa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 985087] Review Request: hadoop - A software platform for processing vast amounts of data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985087 --- Comment #15 from Robert Rati rr...@redhat.com --- Spec URL: http://rrati.fedorapeople.org/hadoop.spec SRPM URL: http://rrati.fedorapeople.org/hadoop-2.0.5-5.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ZHRAbHV5yba=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 985087] Review Request: hadoop - A software platform for processing vast amounts of data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985087 --- Comment #16 from Robert Rati rr...@redhat.com --- Spec URL: http://rrati.fedorapeople.org/hadoop.spec SRPM URL: http://rrati.fedorapeople.org/hadoop-2.0.5-6.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=pHNw6EFCMaa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 985087] Review Request: hadoop - A software platform for processing vast amounts of data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985087 --- Comment #14 from Robert Rati rr...@redhat.com --- These two files are included in other hadoop scripts and do nothing but set env variables. They shouldn't have shebangs really. hadoop-common.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/libexec/hadoop-config.sh hadoop-yarn.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/libexec/yarn-config.sh There are some similar files that do have shebangs, so upstream isn't consistent here. If I was to go for consistency I'd say they should all not have shebangs, but that would produce more errors from rpmlint. I would prefer changes be accepted upstream. These are from the JNI libraries: hadoop-common-native.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/hadoop/libhadoop.so hadoop-libhdfs.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/hadoop/libhdfs.so The ones like: hadoop-yarn.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Are from systemd files These are from permission guidelines from upstream: hadoop-yarn-security.i686: E: setuid-binary /usr/bin/container-executor root 06050L hadoop-yarn-security.i686: E: setgid-binary /usr/bin/container-executor yarn 06050L hadoop-yarn-security.i686: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/container-executor 06050L and is documented in the spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=nE0m9cXbFQa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 985087] Review Request: hadoop - A software platform for processing vast amounts of data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985087 --- Comment #11 from Robert Rati rr...@redhat.com --- Spec URL: http://rrati.fedorapeople.org/hadoop.spec SRPM URL: http://rrati.fedorapeople.org/hadoop-2.0.5-4.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=9WuHJjsVXoa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 985087] Review Request: hadoop - A software platform for processing vast amounts of data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985087 gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=f81Fuebp9ua=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 985087] Review Request: hadoop - A software platform for processing vast amounts of data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985087 --- Comment #13 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it --- there are other problems related to Requires e.g. hadhoop-yarn package lits these Resquires: Requires: aopalliance Requires: atinject Requires: google-guice Requires: guice-servlet Requires: hamcrest Requires: jersey-contribs Requires: junit but in /usr/share/maven-fragments/hadoop-hadoop-yarn.xml are already present (defined by maven/java tools): google-guice guice-servlet jersey-contribs junit you should remove from Requires and also check for the other subpackagesif there are duplicated entries regards -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=fyNyaCe65pa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 985087] Review Request: hadoop - A software platform for processing vast amounts of data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985087 --- Comment #8 from Robert Rati rr...@redhat.com --- Spec URL: http://rrati.fedorapeople.org/hadoop.spec SRPM URL: http://rrati.fedorapeople.org/hadoop-2.0.5-2.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=GKIKKW2eaPa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 985087] Review Request: hadoop - A software platform for processing vast amounts of data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985087 --- Comment #9 from Robert Rati rr...@redhat.com --- Spec URL: http://rrati.fedorapeople.org/hadoop.spec SRPM URL: http://rrati.fedorapeople.org/hadoop-2.0.5-3.fc19.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=MzFVDUnVgQa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 985087] Review Request: hadoop - A software platform for processing vast amounts of data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985087 --- Comment #10 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- Suggestion: Please use http://hadoop.apache.org as URL. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=GyOVS4yTxLa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 985087] Review Request: hadoop - A software platform for processing vast amounts of data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985087 Timothy St. Clair tstcl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bbock...@cse.unl.edu --- Comment #6 from Timothy St. Clair tstcl...@redhat.com --- Recommend %conditionalize certain patches systemd elements such that folks who may want to help transition to EPEL or other collaborators who may want to rebundle (OSG) could do so with relative ease. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=H4d71WtVYfa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 985087] Review Request: hadoop - A software platform for processing vast amounts of data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985087 --- Comment #7 from Robert Rati rr...@redhat.com --- Conditionalizing for inclusion in EPEL or other distributions is not planned at this time. The first step is to get hadoop into fedora. Additionally conditionalizing the patches could be some work. In early efforts I tried to keep the patch set as different patches, but they ended up stepping on each other and there was no order that would allow the patches to apply cleanly. Contributions for towards this goal are welcome but this functionality will not happen before hadoop lands in fedora. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=zmOr4H6GhPa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 985087] Review Request: hadoop - A software platform for processing vast amounts of data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985087 Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||bjoern.es...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|bjoern.es...@gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Björn Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com --- I'll take this for review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=y2woeARBMla=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 985087] Review Request: hadoop - A software platform for processing vast amounts of data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985087 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cicku...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- I'm interested in this package before. I found many lines for el5, will you push hadoop to el5? Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=NyPXPhfH55a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 985087] Review Request: hadoop - A software platform for processing vast amounts of data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985087 Matthew Farrellee m...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Matthew Farrellee m...@redhat.com --- (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #1) I'm interested in this package before. I found many lines for el5, will you push hadoop to el5? Thanks. The target here is F20. Are you interested in working on the dependency tree for EPEL 5? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=j3l6SMus1Xa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 985087] Review Request: hadoop - A software platform for processing vast amounts of data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985087
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Matthew Farrellee from comment #2)
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #1)
I'm interested in this package before.
I found many lines for el5, will you push hadoop to el5?
Thanks.
The target here is F20.
Are you interested in working on the dependency tree for EPEL 5?
IMO we should drop support for el5 as it's really old now in my view.
Some suggestion for the spec:
- Remove all %clean sections
- Remove BuildRoo tag
- Remove rm -rf %{buildroot} in the %install section.
- Remove %defattr(-,root,root)
And for the version tag, can we change these two from:
%global hadoop_base_version 2.0.5
%global hadoop_version %{hadoop_base_version}-alpha
to
%global hadoop_version %{version}-alpha
and put 2.0.5 into Version tag?
You can see you use nearly 20 chars to define 2.0.5, why not just put it into
Version tag?
Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=6Yggysa9Uda=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
