[Bug 985247] Review Request: jackson-jaxrs-providers - Jackson JAX-RS providers

2013-08-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985247

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
   |project.org |
 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
jackson-jaxrs-providers-2.2.2-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 testing
repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=2FDhxpJQJha=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 985247] Review Request: jackson-jaxrs-providers - Jackson JAX-RS providers

2013-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985247



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
jackson-jaxrs-providers-2.2.2-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jackson-jaxrs-providers-2.2.2-1.fc19

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=8oHktTuB7ka=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 985247] Review Request: jackson-jaxrs-providers - Jackson JAX-RS providers

2013-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985247

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=XAFd276ri6a=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 985247] Review Request: jackson-jaxrs-providers - Jackson JAX-RS providers

2013-08-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985247

Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|bjoern.es...@gmail.com  |mgold...@redhat.com



--- Comment #7 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com ---
I'm taking over since Gil removed the dependency on the xml module and the
jaxrs providers are required for Resteasy and WildFly upgrade.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=i14kllJPFka=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 985247] Review Request: jackson-jaxrs-providers - Jackson JAX-RS providers

2013-08-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985247

Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
 Depends On|985232  |
  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #8 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
===
- Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
  Note: Missing: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} in jackson-jaxrs-
  json-provider, jackson-jaxrs-smile-provider
  See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#RequiringBasePackage


= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
 Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in jackson-
 jaxrs-json-provider , jackson-jaxrs-smile-provider , jackson-jaxrs-
 providers-javadoc
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
 Unknown or generated. 62 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
 licensecheck in /home/goldmann/work/review/985247-jackson-jaxrs-
 providers/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[c]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
 Note: Documentation size is 71680 bytes in 6 files.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
 are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm  4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
 in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
 for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
 in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
 supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).

Java:
[x]: Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
 Note: Maven packages do not need to (Build)Require jpackage-utils. It is
 pulled in by maven-local
[x]: Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
 subpackage
[x]: Javadoc subpackages should not have Requires: jpackage-utils
[x]: Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlink)
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build

Maven:
[x]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even
 when building with ant
[x]: Pom files have correct Maven mapping
[x]: 

[Bug 985247] Review Request: jackson-jaxrs-providers - Jackson JAX-RS providers

2013-08-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985247

gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #9 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Thanks!

Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jackson-jaxrs-providers.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jackson-jaxrs-providers-2.2.2-1.fc19.src.rpm

- fix obsolete

New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: jackson-jaxrs-providers
Short Description: Jackson JAX-RS providers
Owners: gil
Branches: f19 f20
InitialCC: java-sig

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Jbo7uBGY9Za=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 985247] Review Request: jackson-jaxrs-providers - Jackson JAX-RS providers

2013-08-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985247



--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5SG7KjB9Yua=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 985247] Review Request: jackson-jaxrs-providers - Jackson JAX-RS providers

2013-08-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985247

Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=6iPxSVWvTEa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 985247] Review Request: jackson-jaxrs-providers - Jackson JAX-RS providers

2013-07-31 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985247

Bug 985247 depends on bug 985231, which changed state.

Bug 985231 Summary: Review Request: jackson-dataformat-smile - Support for 
reading and writing Smile encoded data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985231

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=tCzeiAOvVNa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 985247] Review Request: jackson-jaxrs-providers - Jackson JAX-RS providers

2013-07-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985247

gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||984554

--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
*** Bug 857138 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=EVqp816lpWa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 985247] Review Request: jackson-jaxrs-providers - Jackson JAX-RS providers

2013-07-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985247

--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jackson2-jaxrs-providers.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jackson2-jaxrs-providers-2.2.2-1.fc19.src.rpm

- disable xml sub module

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=fx4q7P0cvGa=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 985247] Review Request: jackson-jaxrs-providers - Jackson JAX-RS providers

2013-07-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985247

--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
sorry wrong links
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jackson-jaxrs-providers.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jackson-jaxrs-providers-2.2.2-1.fc19.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=icwwqIQl9Ha=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 985247] Review Request: jackson-jaxrs-providers - Jackson JAX-RS providers

2013-07-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985247

gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
   |jackson2-jaxrs-providers -  |jackson-jaxrs-providers -
   |Jackson JAX-RS providers|Jackson JAX-RS providers

--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jackson-jaxrs-providers.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jackson-jaxrs-providers-2.2.2-1.fc19.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hhACPCAvUva=cc_unsubscribe
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review