[Bug 996813] Review Request: SQLCipher - Encrypted SQLite databases
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996813 Raphael Gronerchanged: What|Removed |Added CC||projects...@smart.ms Resolution|DEFERRED|DUPLICATE --- Comment #9 from Raphael Groner --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1310294 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996813] Review Request: SQLCipher - Encrypted SQLite databases
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996813 Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||msu...@redhat.com Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution|--- |DEFERRED Last Closed||2015-07-21 10:48:07 --- Comment #8 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com --- Closing due long inactivity. Feel free to reopen if you want to continue. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996813] Review Request: SQLCipher - Encrypted SQLite databases
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996813 noobie juli...@riseup.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||juli...@riseup.net --- Comment #7 from noobie juli...@riseup.net --- definitely missing in the repo,no one willing to back it ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996813] Review Request: SQLCipher - Encrypted SQLite databases
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996813 --- Comment #6 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- Any news here? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996813] Review Request: SQLCipher - Encrypted SQLite databases
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996813 --- Comment #2 from Abel Luck a...@outcomedubious.im --- Hm, I hadn't thought to. This would be my first time maintaining a package. Is the package more likely to be accepted if I support EPEL? I'd need to look into the workload required to support it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996813] Review Request: SQLCipher - Encrypted SQLite databases
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996813 Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bjoern.es...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com --- That usually has no affect whether you want to build for EPEL or not. The _real_ problem here is: Your package ships a bundled sqlite-version and that's something which is strongly discouraged. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries You should actually unbundle `sqlite` and build this against the one shipped by the system's libs. BTW. Christopher's question was about the presence of `rm -rf %{buildroot}` on %install and %check and the presence of Group: and BuildRoot: tags... Those are simply not needed, but for = el5. You can safely drop `defattr`, because this was needed on = el4. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996813] Review Request: SQLCipher - Encrypted SQLite databases
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996813 --- Comment #4 from Björn besser82 Esser bjoern.es...@gmail.com --- The next problem related to the bundled `sqlite` is: They way it get's packaged will simply conflict with system's installation of sqlite and thus is another no-go and will cause _serious_ trouble to other software which is build against system's version of sqlite.. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996813] Review Request: SQLCipher - Encrypted SQLite databases
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996813 --- Comment #5 from Abel Luck a...@outcomedubious.im --- Thanks Björn! 1. I believe SQLCipher deserves a No Bundled Libraries exception, so I'm preparing an exception request. Once that's submitted, I'll link it here. 2. The reason for the EPEL looking code is because I based this package off the existing sqlite package. Should I remove them if I don't plan on supporting EPEL? 3. I don't believe SQLCipher will conflict with the system's sqlite. There are no file path conflicts. Moreover, I have sqlite, sqlite-devel, sqlcipher, and sqlcipher-devel installed simultaneously on my dev system with no conflicts. 4. A new version of SQLCipher has been released since I created the package, I'll be updating it next week. Now that I have a space on fedorapeople.org, I'll upload the new sources there. You can see this from the rpmls output below. [user@fedora-pkg rpmbuild]$ rpmls RPMS/x86_64/sqlcipher-devel-2.2.1-1.fc18.x86_64.rpm -rw-r--r-- /usr/include/sqlcipher/sqlite3.h -rw-r--r-- /usr/include/sqlcipher/sqlite3ext.h lrwxrwxrwx /usr/lib64/libsqlcipher.so -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/sqlcipher.pc [user@fedora-pkg rpmbuild]$ rpmls RPMS/x86_64/sqlcipher-2.2.1-1.fc18.x86_64.rpm -rwxr-xr-x /usr/bin/sqlcipher lrwxrwxrwx /usr/lib64/libsqlcipher.so.0 -rwxr-xr-x /usr/lib64/libsqlcipher.so.0.8.6 drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/doc/sqlcipher-2.2.1 -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/sqlcipher-2.2.1/LICENSE -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/sqlcipher-2.2.1/README -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/man/man1/sqlcipher.1.gz [user@fedora-pkg rpmbuild]$ rpmls RPMS/x86_64/sqlcipher-tcl-2.2.1-1.fc18.x86_64.rpm drwxr-xr-x /usr/lib64/tcl8.5/sqlcipher -rwxr-xr-x /usr/lib64/tcl8.5/sqlcipher/libtclsqlite3.so -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib64/tcl8.5/sqlcipher/pkgIndex.tcl -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996813] Review Request: SQLCipher - Encrypted SQLite databases
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996813 Abel Luck a...@outcomedubious.im changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=jUyj2os4VPa=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 996813] Review Request: SQLCipher - Encrypted SQLite databases
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=996813 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cicku...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- Are you going to support EPEL? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=VqEiO8jfQ4a=cc_unsubscribe ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review