Re: [packman] An advice regarding Kodi packages

2016-02-23 Diskussionsfäden Stefan Botter
Hi,

On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 13:53:11 +0100
Hendrik Vogelsang  wrote:
> That's just another layer of indirection isn't it? Whatever Sagi
> deems neccesarry should be required by the main package. The rest can
> be handled by weak dependencies (Recommends).

I am not sure if we provide the Recommends. The full repo is generated
on vesta using an older version of createrepo (old Debian), but Marc
should know.

if the individual binary packages for kodi are on github in separate
repos, we can set up these packages using source services, almost
generic, like done with vdr (in OBS).


Greetings,

Stefan
-- 
Stefan Botter zu Hause
Bremen


pgpbw7T5aJ5ui.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman

Re: [packman] An advice regarding Kodi packages

2016-02-23 Diskussionsfäden Hendrik Vogelsang

Hey,

On 23.02.2016 13:26, Markus Kohm wrote:

I would definitively mimic the official packaging.


Me too. But maybe pseudo-packages for groups of addons would be usefull, e.g.
kodi-addons-video that requires all video addons but does not contain any
addon, and a pseudo-package kodi-addons-all that requires all addons.


That's just another layer of indirection isn't it? Whatever Sagi deems 
neccesarry should be required by the main package. The rest can be 
handled by weak dependencies (Recommends).


Henne

--
Henne Vogelsang
http://hennevogel.de
"To die. In the rain. Alone."
   Ernest Hemingway


___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman


Re: [packman] An advice regarding Kodi packages

2016-02-23 Diskussionsfäden Markus Kohm
> I would definitively mimic the official packaging.

Me too. But maybe pseudo-packages for groups of addons would be usefull, e.g. 
kodi-addons-video that requires all video addons but does not contain any 
addon, and a pseudo-package kodi-addons-all that requires all addons.

This should be efficient not only for installation of some addons but also for 
installation of some addons and update of all or only a single addon.

Markus

___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman


Re: [packman] An advice regarding Kodi packages

2016-02-23 Diskussionsfäden Hendrik Vogelsang

Hey,

On 22.02.2016 20:53, Sagi Ben-Akiva wrote:

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 8:11 PM, Stefan Botter  wrote:

On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:44:06 +0200 Sagi Ben-Akiva  wrote:


1. Do you think we should keep them in 2 separate projects or merge
them to one ?
2. Should we provide a standalone package for each binary addon ?


I would prefer option 1


Kodi team builds the packages for Ubuntu and they have a single package for
each addon.


I would definitively mimic the official packaging. This will be way less 
confusing for people using the package as I suspect this will quickly be 
reflected in the official documentation...


Henne

--
Henne Vogelsang
http://hennevogel.de
"To die. In the rain. Alone."
   Ernest Hemingway


___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman