Re: [packman] publishing disabled due to ffmpeg3

[Olaf Hering]

On Tue, Feb 16, Olaf Hering wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 16, Dave Plater wrote:
> 
> > That should work, there's not that many packages according to :
> > osc whatdependson  Essentials ffmpeg openSUSE_Tumbleweed x86_64
> 
> 87 pkgs require ffmpeg according to my search.
> home:olh:ffmpeg is mostly green with old ffmpeg.

With a new pkg ffmpeg-2.8 the amount of work to dig into each failing
pkg can be reduced to a minimum. This new pkg should continue to provide
pkgconfig(whatever) = version. The failed packages should be converted to
use BuildRequires: pkgconfig(whatever) = version. A few months ago most
pkgs got converted to use pkgconfig already, so this is now just a
simple sed call for each spec file.

pkgconfig(libavcodec) = 56.60.100 vs. +57.24.102
pkgconfig(libavdevice) = 56.4.100 vs. +57.0.101
pkgconfig(libavfilter) = 5.40.101 vs. +6.31.100
pkgconfig(libavformat) = 56.40.101 vs. +57.25.100
pkgconfig(libavresample) = 2.1.0 vs. +3.0.0
pkgconfig(libavutil) = 54.31.100 vs. +55.17.103
pkgconfig(libpostproc) = 53.3.100 vs. +54.0.100
pkgconfig(libswresample) = 1.2.101 vs. +2.0.101
pkgconfig(libswscale) = 3.1.101 vs. +4.0.100

Olaf

___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman

Re: [packman] publishing disabled due to ffmpeg3

[Hendrik Vogelsang]

Hey,

On 16.02.2016 08:08, Olaf Hering wrote:

On Mon, Feb 15, Olaf Hering wrote:


The ffmpeg package was upgraded to version 3.0, most likely by accident.
As a result many packages fail to build. To avoid broken rpm
dependencies I have disabled publishing. It should be enabled once
everything is green again in the /monitor page.


How should this be handled? My idea is to create a temporary (or
permanent) staging project which contains _link's to all packages which
have ffmpeg in BuildRequires.


You can also do project links. Setup a project, project link Mulitmedia, 
setup the same Repositories for it and update ffmpeg. Like openSUSE does 
in the Factory staging projects [1]


Henne

[1] https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/openSUSE:Factory:Staging:A

--
Henne Vogelsang
http://hennevogel.de
"To die. In the rain. Alone."
   Ernest Hemingway


___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman

Re: [packman] publishing disabled due to ffmpeg3

[Olaf Hering]

On Tue, Feb 16, Dave Plater wrote:

> That should work, there's not that many packages according to :
> osc whatdependson  Essentials ffmpeg openSUSE_Tumbleweed x86_64

87 pkgs require ffmpeg according to my search.
home:olh:ffmpeg is mostly green with old ffmpeg.

Olaf

___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman

Re: [packman] publishing disabled due to ffmpeg3

[Dave Plater]

On 2/16/16, Olaf Hering  wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, Olaf Hering wrote:
>
>> The ffmpeg package was upgraded to version 3.0, most likely by accident.
>> As a result many packages fail to build. To avoid broken rpm
>> dependencies I have disabled publishing. It should be enabled once
>> everything is green again in the /monitor page.
>
> How should this be handled? My idea is to create a temporary (or
> permanent) staging project which contains _link's to all packages which
> have ffmpeg in BuildRequires. This gives an overview what packages need
> changing. Since this staging project is just a compile test building
> against 13.2/i586, 13.2/x86_64 and Factory/x86_64 should be enough, to
> reduce turnaround time.
>
>
> Olaf
>
That should work, there's not that many packages according to :
osc whatdependson  Essentials ffmpeg openSUSE_Tumbleweed x86_64
There's about 29 but this doesn't pick up the packages in Extra and Multimedia.
You should try osc whatdependson openSUSE:Factory ffmpeg standard
x86_64, I can't count the packages. Anyway I've reverted
multimedia:libs to 2.8.6 meanwhile and the ffmpeg-3.0 package can be
copypac'ed from home:plater ffmpeg.
Regards
Dave

___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman

Re: [packman] publishing disabled due to ffmpeg3

[Olaf Hering]

On Mon, Feb 15, Olaf Hering wrote:

> The ffmpeg package was upgraded to version 3.0, most likely by accident.
> As a result many packages fail to build. To avoid broken rpm
> dependencies I have disabled publishing. It should be enabled once
> everything is green again in the /monitor page.

How should this be handled? My idea is to create a temporary (or
permanent) staging project which contains _link's to all packages which
have ffmpeg in BuildRequires. This gives an overview what packages need
changing. Since this staging project is just a compile test building
against 13.2/i586, 13.2/x86_64 and Factory/x86_64 should be enough, to
reduce turnaround time.


Olaf

___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman

Re: [packman] publishing disabled due to ffmpeg3

[Dave Plater]

On 2/15/16, Olaf Hering  wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, Dave Plater wrote:
>
>> On 2/15/16, Olaf Hering  wrote:
>> > The ffmpeg package was upgraded to version 3.0, most likely by
>> > accident.
>> > As a result many packages fail to build. To avoid broken rpm
>> > dependencies I have disabled publishing. It should be enabled once
>> > everything is green again in the /monitor page.
>> >
>> > Olaf
>> >
>> It wasn't by accident, I'm trying to revert mmlibs to 2.8.6 now.
>
> You mean ffmpeg? Since publishing is disabled we are not in a hurry
> anymore.
As long as nothing has built against it already.
Dave
>
> Olaf
>

___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman

Re: [packman] publishing disabled due to ffmpeg3

[Olaf Hering]

On Mon, Feb 15, Dave Plater wrote:

> On 2/15/16, Olaf Hering  wrote:
> > The ffmpeg package was upgraded to version 3.0, most likely by accident.
> > As a result many packages fail to build. To avoid broken rpm
> > dependencies I have disabled publishing. It should be enabled once
> > everything is green again in the /monitor page.
> >
> > Olaf
> >
> It wasn't by accident, I'm trying to revert mmlibs to 2.8.6 now.

You mean ffmpeg? Since publishing is disabled we are not in a hurry
anymore.

Olaf

___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman

Re: [packman] publishing disabled due to ffmpeg3

[Dave Plater]

I've reverted multimedia:libs/ffmpeg to 2.8.6.
which packages fail with ffmpeg 3.0, I've picked up wxsvg, blender,
qtractor, dvdwizard and transcode.
Dave P

On 2/15/16, Dave Plater  wrote:
> On 2/15/16, Olaf Hering  wrote:
>> The ffmpeg package was upgraded to version 3.0, most likely by accident.
>> As a result many packages fail to build. To avoid broken rpm
>> dependencies I have disabled publishing. It should be enabled once
>> everything is green again in the /monitor page.
>>
>> Olaf
>>
> It wasn't by accident, I'm trying to revert mmlibs to 2.8.6 now.
> Wasn't me
> Dave P
>

___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman

Re: [packman] publishing disabled due to ffmpeg3

[Dave Plater]

On 2/15/16, Olaf Hering  wrote:
> The ffmpeg package was upgraded to version 3.0, most likely by accident.
> As a result many packages fail to build. To avoid broken rpm
> dependencies I have disabled publishing. It should be enabled once
> everything is green again in the /monitor page.
>
> Olaf
>
It wasn't by accident, I'm trying to revert mmlibs to 2.8.6 now.
Wasn't me
Dave P

___
Packman mailing list
Packman@links2linux.de
http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman