Re: [Paraview] ParaView v5.2.0: Problems with inspecting Use Below (Above) Range Color

2017-02-21 Thread Utkarsh Ayachit 
Where are you getting the vtkLookupTable from? ParaView doesn't use
vtkLookupTable directly, is uses vtkPVDiscretizableColorTransferFunction

 .

Utkarsh

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Nenad Vujicic  wrote:

> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm trying to inspect values of "UseBelowRangeColor" and
> "UseAboveRangeColor" flags from my ParaView exporter plugin by:
>
> 1. Retrieving vtkCompositePolyDataMapper2 from currently active view and
> rendering window, then,
> 2. Getting it's vtkLookupTable and then calling GetUseAboveRangeColor()
> and GetUseBelowRangeColor(),
>
> However, first call (for checking using above range color) always passes
> and returns some big number and second one (for checking using below range
> color) always crashes, regardless whether flags are turned ON / OFF in
> ParaView UI.
>
> Any suggestions about this or ideas how I could pick up these values in
> different way?
>
> Thanks in advance!
> Nenad.
>
> ___
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/
> opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
>
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] 3 arguments to _CreatePipeline for Catalyst

2017-02-21 Thread Andy Bauer 
Hi,

Please keep the conversations on the mailing list so that all can
participate.

The best way currently to pass information back and forth between the
adaptor (i.e. C++ code) and the Catalyst pipelines is to use the
vtkCPDataDescription's UserData member which is a vtkFieldData object (
http://www.paraview.org/ParaView/Doc/Nightly/www/cxx-doc/classvtkCPDataDescription.html).
It is Python wrapped so you can access it in the Python scripts as well.

Cheers,
Andy

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 2:54 AM, Lukáš Kresta 
wrote:

> Thank you. How can I send that argument from adaptor? (I use C++)
>
> 2017-02-20 16:08 GMT+01:00 Andy Bauer :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> If you edit the coprocessing.py script in the ParaView build/install
>> directory you can do that.
>>
>> Maybe an easier way though is to just create global variable that is used
>> in your _CreatePipeline() method. An example is:
>> from paraview.simple import *
>> from paraview import coprocessing
>>
>> myvalue = 0
>> #--
>> # Code generated from cpstate.py to create the CoProcessor.
>> # ParaView 5.1.2-411-gf717569 64 bits
>>
>>
>> # --- CoProcessor definition ---
>>
>> def CreateCoProcessor():
>>   def _CreatePipeline(coprocessor, datadescription):
>> class Pipeline:
>>   global myvalue
>>   print 'myvalue is ', myvalue
>> ...
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 3:26 AM, Lukáš Kresta 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Is somehow possible to send 3. argument to CreatePipeline or it is fixed
>>> to have only 2 arguments?
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>
>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>
>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
>>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>>>
>>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>>>
>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>>>
>>>
>>
>
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] Different visualization result using serial or parallel ParaView ...

2017-02-21 Thread Andy Bauer 
Hi Stefan,

Thanks for the bug issue report. There is a potential fix in VTK at
https://gitlab.kitware.com/vtk/vtk/merge_requests/2504

I am optimistic that this will  make it into the upcomgin ParaView 5.3
release.

Thanks,
Andy

On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 7:35 AM, Stefan Melber  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> amendment: the test case i send to you also crashes using the D31-filter:
>
> Executing with: Executing with: 0
> Executing with: 0
> Executing with: 0
> Executing with: 0
> Executing with: 0
> Executing with: 0
> Executing with: 0
> 0
>
> 
> ===
> =   BAD TERMINATION OF ONE OF YOUR APPLICATION PROCESSES
> =   PID 23833 RUNNING AT bsastf670os
> =   EXIT CODE: 139
> =   CLEANING UP REMAINING PROCESSES
> =   YOU CAN IGNORE THE BELOW CLEANUP MESSAGES
> 
> ===
> YOUR APPLICATION TERMINATED WITH THE EXIT STRING: Segmentation fault
> (signal 11)
> This typically refers to a problem with your application.
> Please see the FAQ page for debugging suggestions
>
> This now looks like a bug ;-)
>
>  Stefan
>
> Stefan,
>
> Attached is a fixed state file. Since the file didn't have ghost-cell
> information, the filters like "Compute Derivatives" didn't produce correct
> result at the process boundary cells. By putting a "Ghost Cell Generator"
> filter in the pipeline, one can address that issue.
>
> Utkarsh
>
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 8:18 AM, Utkarsh Ayachit <
> utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com> wrote:
>
>> That's odd. Stefan, can you send me the dataset please? I'll have it
>> looked into.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Utkarsh
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 4:04 AM, Stefan Melber 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> during visualization of vortices i found a bug (or feature?) of
>>> ParaView: running the case in serial mode the results look fine. However,
>>> doing the same in parallel mode (e.g. 8 cores) the picture looks "ugly".
>>> Has anyone seen such an effect running in parallel? I am using the current
>>> version (v5.2.0) on a Linux 64bit machine with a Quadro 4000 graphics card.
>>>
>>> Attached there are two pics showing the effect, a picture of the used
>>> pipeline and the restart file...
>>>
>>> The test-data can be send to you for testing - i just need a
>>> email-address to send it to.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>>  Stefan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>
>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>
>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
>>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>>>
>>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>>>
>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> ___
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/
> opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
>
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

[Paraview] wrong representation of vtkImageData in pipeline

2017-02-21 Thread michal wozniak 
Hi,


I am creating an Image using a filter and then adding it to the pipeline. In 
Paraview, it is displaying a weird image like if it was corrupted.


To verify that my filter was creating the image correctly, I am using the 
vtkTIFFWriter to output the image in tiff format. I open the tiff file using a 
normal picture app and it is correctly displaying it. I can even load that tiff 
file in ParaView and it will show it correctly.


Has anyone had a similar problem? Is there a solution to this problem.


thanks

Michal




___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

[Paraview] problems with packaging of superbuild

2017-02-21 Thread Stefan Vater 
Hi,

I have some problems when packaging my paraview superbuild (v5.2.0) 
after building. When I do

ctest -VV -R cpack-paraview-TGZ

I first get

UpdateCTestConfiguration  from 
:/home/paraview/paraview-5.2.0/DartConfiguration.tcl
Parse Config file:/home/paraview/paraview-5.2.0/DartConfiguration.tcl
 Add coverage exclude regular expressions.
SetCTestConfiguration:CMakeCommand:/home/cmake-3.7.2-Linux-x86_64/bin/cmake
UpdateCTestConfiguration  from 
:/home/paraview/paraview-5.2.0/DartConfiguration.tcl
Parse Config file:/home/paraview/paraview-5.2.0/DartConfiguration.tcl
Test project /home/paraview/paraview-5.2.0
Constructing a list of tests
Done constructing a list of tests
Updating test list for fixtures
Added 0 tests to meet fixture requirements
Checking test dependency graph...
Checking test dependency graph end
test 1
Start 1: cpack-paraview-TGZ

1: Test command: /home/cmake-3.7.2-Linux-x86_64/bin/cmake "-Dname=paraview" 
"-Dcmake_generator=Unix Makefiles" "-Dcpack_generator=TGZ" 
"-Doutput_directory=/home/paraview/paraview-5.2.0" 
"-Dsource_directory=/home/paraview/paraview-5.2.0/cpack/paraview/TGZ" 
"-Dbuild_directory=/home/paraview/paraview-5.2.0/cpack/paraview/TGZ/build" "-P" 
"/home/paraview/paraview-superbuild/superbuild/cmake/scripts/package_test.cmake"
1: Test timeout computed to be: 6400
1: CMake Error at 
/home/paraview/paraview-superbuild/superbuild/projects/qt4.functions.cmake:53 
(message):
1:   Unable to find the sqldrivers/libqsqlite plugin from Qt4 under
1:   /home/paraview/paraview-5.2.0/install/../plugins.
1: Call Stack (most recent call first):
1:   
/home/paraview/paraview-superbuild/projects/paraview.bundle.common.cmake:187 
(superbuild_install_qt4_plugin_paths)
1:   /home/paraview/paraview-superbuild/projects/unix/paraview.bundle.cmake:5 
(include)
1:   CMakeLists.txt:32 (include)
1: 
1: 
1: -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
1: See also 
"/home/paraview/paraview-5.2.0/cpack/paraview/TGZ/build/CMakeFiles/CMakeOutput.log".
1: CMake Error at 
/home/paraview/paraview-superbuild/superbuild/cmake/scripts/package_test.cmake:9
 (message):
1:   CMake failed with exit code 1
1: 
1: 
1/1 Test #1: cpack-paraview-TGZ ...***Failed0.01 sec

I then changed in superbuild/projects/qt4.functions.cmake

set(qt4_plugin_path "${qt4_base_libdir}/../plugins")
to
set(qt4_plugin_path "${qt4_base_libdir}/plugins")

With that I get 

[...]
1: Test command: /home/cmake-3.7.2-Linux-x86_64/bin/cmake "-Dname=paraview" 
"-Dcmake_generator=Unix Makefiles" "-Dcpack_generator=TGZ" 
"-Doutput_directory=/home/paraview/paraview-5.2.0" 
"-Dsource_directory=/home/paraview/paraview-5.2.0/cpack/paraview/TGZ" 
"-Dbuild_directory=/home/paraview/paraview-5.2.0/cpack/paraview/TGZ/build" "-P" 
"/home/paraview/paraview-superbuild/superbuild/cmake/scripts/package_test.cmake"
1: Test timeout computed to be: 6400
1: CMake Error at 
/home/paraview/paraview-superbuild/superbuild/cmake/SuperbuildInstallMacros.cmake:232
 (message):
1:   Unable to find the libCatalystScriptGeneratorPlugin.so plugin in
1:   lib/paraview-5.2
1: Call Stack (most recent call first):
1:   
/home/paraview/paraview-superbuild/projects/unix/paraview.bundle.unix.cmake:26 
(superbuild_unix_install_plugin)
1:   /home/paraview/paraview-superbuild/projects/unix/paraview.bundle.cmake:8 
(include)
1:   CMakeLists.txt:32 (include)
1: 
1: 
1: -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
1: See also 
"/home/paraview/paraview-5.2.0/cpack/paraview/TGZ/build/CMakeFiles/CMakeOutput.log".
1: CMake Error at 
/home/paraview/paraview-superbuild/superbuild/cmake/scripts/package_test.cmake:9
 (message):
1:   CMake failed with exit code 1
1: 
1: 
1/1 Test #1: cpack-paraview-TGZ ...***Failed0.02 sec

Any help is appreciated!

Best regards,
Stefan
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Superbuild repo change?

2017-02-21 Thread Cory Quammen 
Rick,

What is the SHA-1 for last commit in your paraview-superbuild
directory? The latest commit on master is
22e4b36087b523e01994b90f7b1c5eabb6c0755b. In the file versions.cmake
at line 63, 5.3.0-RC1 should be listed as a version option.

Thanks,
Cory

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV
USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)  wrote:
> I did a “git pull” and “git submodule update” in the paraview-superbuild
> directory.   I then changed the source flag in my cmake command:
>
> -Dparaview_SOURCE_SELECTION="5.3.0-RC1”
>
> and I get this error when doing a clean build.
>
> -- Detecting CXX compile features - done
> -- Check size of void*
> -- Check size of void* - done
> CMake Error at superbuild/cmake/SuperbuildRevisionMacros.cmake:338
> (message):
>   The 5.3.0-RC1 source selection for paraview does not exist.
> Call Stack (most recent call first):
>   versions.cmake:62 (superbuild_set_selectable_source)
>   superbuild/CMakeLists.txt:96 (include)
>
>
> I grepp’ed through the paraview-superbuild directory and I don’t see any
> references to 5.3.
>
>
>
>
> 
> Rick Angelini
> USArmy Research Laboratory
> CISD/HPC Architectures Team
> Phone:  410-278-6266
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Cory Quammen 
> Date: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 at 10:07 AM
> To: Rick Angelini 
> Cc: "ben.boec...@kitware.com" , ParaView
> 
> Subject: Re: [Paraview] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Superbuild repo change?
>
> All active links contained in this email were disabled.  Please verify the
> identity of the sender, and confirm the authenticity of all links
> contained within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a
> Web browser.
>
>
>
>
> 
>
> Hi Rick,
>
> From paraview-superbuild master (remember to run 'git submodule
> update' after updating master), you should be able to set
> paraview_SOURCE_SELECTION to 5.3.0-RC1. Then just configure and build.
>
> These directions are distilled from the README.md file in the
> superbuild directory [1]. Relevant excerpt:
>
> "3. Another option is to use a source tarball of a ParaView release.
> For that, set paraview_SOURCE_SELECTION to the version to build such
> as 5.2.0. The superbuild offers the lastest stable release as well as
> release candidate in preparation for the release. This is the best way
> to build a released version of ParaView."
>
> For each release candidate and release, we add an entry under
> paraview_SOURCE_SELECTION that you can select.
>
> Let us know if you run into problems.
>
> Thanks,
> Cory
>
> [1]
> Caution-https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview-superbuild/blob/master
> /README.md
>
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 8:42 AM, Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY
> RDECOM ARL (US)  wrote:
>> What are the instructions for using PVSB to build the 5.3- RC ?
>> 
>> Rick Angelini
>> USArmy Research Laboratory
>> CISD/HPC Architectures Team
>> Phone:  410-278-6266
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ben Boeckel 
>> Reply-To: "ben.boec...@kitware.com" 
>> Date: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 11:34 AM
>> To: Rick Angelini 
>> Cc: ParaView 
>> Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [Paraview] Superbuild repo change?
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 13:50:13 +, Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV
>> USARMY RDECOM ARL (US) wrote:
>>> I did a fresh pull of the ParaView superbuild repository, and now I
>>>can’t do
>>> a clean build of PV 5.2.0 on my Mac (OSX 10.9.5).
>>>
>>> First, I had to remove the entries for “qt” and “scipy" in the
>>> CMakeLists.txt:
>>
>> You need to run `git submodule update` to update the common-superbuild
>> bits.
>>
>>> After removing those entries, the cmake completes and the build starts
>>>and
>>> passes out in qt4.
>>> I’m not sure why it’s complaining about OS X 10.7 or later?)
>>
>> What version of Xcode are you using?
>>
>> --Ben
>>
>> ___
>> Powered by Caution-www.kitware.com
>>
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>Caution-http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
>>Caution-http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>>
>> Search the list archives at:
>>Caution-http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>>
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> Caution-http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cory Quammen
> Staff R Engineer
> Kitware, Inc.



-- 
Cory Quammen
Staff R Engineer
Kitware, Inc.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView

Re: [Paraview] Compiling Paraview 5.2 GCC 4.8 vtkOpenGLRenderWindow.cxx, line 641

2017-02-21 Thread Nabil Ghodbane 
Hi,
fine, I started a parallel build on another node using Python 2.7.12, it
seems to be compiling so far...
As I wrote it previously, the first compilation based on Python 2.7.11
shipped by the superbuilder fails  with the following message:
do you know by chance whether I do have to switch on/off some flag ?

Below, the error messages...
thanks for your valuable help


-- Found PythonInterp: /root//build/install/bin/python2.7 (found version
"2.7.11")
CMake Error at CommandLineExecutables/CMakeLists.txt:77 (get_property):
  get_property could not find TARGET hdf5.  Perhaps it has not yet been
  created.


CMake Error at CommandLineExecutables/CMakeLists.txt:82 (get_property):
  get_property could not find TARGET hdf5.  Perhaps it has not yet been
  created.


CMake Error at CommandLineExecutables/CMakeLists.txt:77 (get_property):
  get_property could not find TARGET hdf5.  Perhaps it has not yet been
  created.


CMake Error at CommandLineExecutables/CMakeLists.txt:82 (get_property):
  get_property could not find TARGET hdf5.  Perhaps it has not yet been
  created.


-- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!

Nabil Ghodbane (Ph. D. Habil*.*)
Phone: +33 6 34 42 33 43
Mailto: nabil.ghodb...@gmail.com


On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Ben Boeckel 
wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 17:57:37 +0100, Nabil Ghodbane wrote:
> > many thanks for the prompt reply. I should have hit the toggle option :).
>
> It's fine, that bug is elusive and a pain to deal with.
>
> > No i did not give it a try yet. I will try it and send feedback (I am
> using
> > miniconda)
> > Does this mean that using non embedded python is still experimental ?
>
> Using a system Python is fine, it's just that the one in the superbuild
> hasn't been bumped.
>
> --Ben
>
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] Compiling Paraview 5.2 GCC 4.8 vtkOpenGLRenderWindow.cxx, line 641

2017-02-21 Thread Ben Boeckel 
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 17:57:37 +0100, Nabil Ghodbane wrote:
> many thanks for the prompt reply. I should have hit the toggle option :).

It's fine, that bug is elusive and a pain to deal with.

> No i did not give it a try yet. I will try it and send feedback (I am using
> miniconda)
> Does this mean that using non embedded python is still experimental ?

Using a system Python is fine, it's just that the one in the superbuild
hasn't been bumped.

--Ben
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] Compiling Paraview 5.2 GCC 4.8 vtkOpenGLRenderWindow.cxx, line 641

2017-02-21 Thread Nabil Ghodbane 
Hi,
did by chance someone hit this additional issue about missing hdf5 target.
I checked that the super build script managed to successfully download the
archive: hdf5-1.8.13.tar.gz
but it seems, it fails
Do I have to switch some additional flag, or is this some issue?
thanks


-- Found PythonInterp: /root//build/install/bin/python2.7 (found version
"2.7.11")
CMake Error at CommandLineExecutables/CMakeLists.txt:77 (get_property):
  get_property could not find TARGET hdf5.  Perhaps it has not yet been
  created.


CMake Error at CommandLineExecutables/CMakeLists.txt:82 (get_property):
  get_property could not find TARGET hdf5.  Perhaps it has not yet been
  created.


CMake Error at CommandLineExecutables/CMakeLists.txt:77 (get_property):
  get_property could not find TARGET hdf5.  Perhaps it has not yet been
  created.


CMake Error at CommandLineExecutables/CMakeLists.txt:82 (get_property):
  get_property could not find TARGET hdf5.  Perhaps it has not yet been
  created.


-- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!


Nabil Ghodbane (Ph. D. Habil*.*)
Phone: +33 6 34 42 33 43
Mailto: nabil.ghodb...@gmail.com


On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 5:57 PM, Nabil Ghodbane 
wrote:

> hi Ben,
> many thanks for the prompt reply. I should have hit the toggle option :).
> No i did not give it a try yet. I will try it and send feedback (I am using
> miniconda)
> Does this mean that using non embedded python is still experimental ?
> thanks
>
> Nabil Ghodbane (Ph. D. Habil*.*)
> Phone: +33 6 34 42 33 43 <06%2034%2042%2033%2043>
> Mailto: nabil.ghodb...@gmail.com
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Ben Boeckel 
> wrote:
>
>> > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Nabil Ghodbane
>> > >  wrote:
>> > > > OK many thanks,; I am trying to use the Superbuild now.
>> > > > I can see that it is downloading Python 2.7.11. Is there a
>> particular
>> > > reason
>> > > > to use this version instead of the 2.7.12?
>>
>> Haven't gotten around to updating to 2.7.12 (we're behind in updating
>> dependencies).
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 16:18:48 +0100, Nabil Ghodbane wrote:
>> > ok thanks for the hint. I obviously missed this point. I will try again.
>> > I tried with the Python which is downloaded by the Paraview builder and
>> i
>> > am hiting a new issue about libQtLucene.so
>> > Is this a known issue ?
>>
>> There's a flag qt4_WORK_AROUND_BROKEN_ASSISTANT_BUILD you can set (it's
>> marked as advanced, so it is hidden by default). Details are here if
>> you're interested:
>>
>> https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/common-superbuild/blob/
>> master/projects/qt4.common.cmake#L5
>>
>> --Ben
>>
>
>
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] Compiling Paraview 5.2 GCC 4.8 vtkOpenGLRenderWindow.cxx, line 641

2017-02-21 Thread Nabil Ghodbane 
hi Ben,
many thanks for the prompt reply. I should have hit the toggle option :).
No i did not give it a try yet. I will try it and send feedback (I am using
miniconda)
Does this mean that using non embedded python is still experimental ?
thanks

Nabil Ghodbane (Ph. D. Habil*.*)
Phone: +33 6 34 42 33 43
Mailto: nabil.ghodb...@gmail.com


On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Ben Boeckel 
wrote:

> > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Nabil Ghodbane
> > >  wrote:
> > > > OK many thanks,; I am trying to use the Superbuild now.
> > > > I can see that it is downloading Python 2.7.11. Is there a particular
> > > reason
> > > > to use this version instead of the 2.7.12?
>
> Haven't gotten around to updating to 2.7.12 (we're behind in updating
> dependencies).
>
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 16:18:48 +0100, Nabil Ghodbane wrote:
> > ok thanks for the hint. I obviously missed this point. I will try again.
> > I tried with the Python which is downloaded by the Paraview builder and i
> > am hiting a new issue about libQtLucene.so
> > Is this a known issue ?
>
> There's a flag qt4_WORK_AROUND_BROKEN_ASSISTANT_BUILD you can set (it's
> marked as advanced, so it is hidden by default). Details are here if
> you're interested:
>
> https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/common-superbuild/
> blob/master/projects/qt4.common.cmake#L5
>
> --Ben
>
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

[Paraview] ParaView v5.2.0: Problems with inspecting Use Below (Above) Range Color

2017-02-21 Thread Nenad Vujicic 
Hello everyone,

I'm trying to inspect values of "UseBelowRangeColor" and
"UseAboveRangeColor" flags from my ParaView exporter plugin by:

1. Retrieving vtkCompositePolyDataMapper2 from currently active view and
rendering window, then,
2. Getting it's vtkLookupTable and then calling GetUseAboveRangeColor() and
GetUseBelowRangeColor(),

However, first call (for checking using above range color) always passes
and returns some big number and second one (for checking using below range
color) always crashes, regardless whether flags are turned ON / OFF in
ParaView UI.

Any suggestions about this or ideas how I could pick up these values in
different way?

Thanks in advance!
Nenad.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Superbuild repo change?

2017-02-21 Thread Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US) 
I did a “git pull” and “git submodule update” in the paraview-superbuild
directory.   I then changed the source flag in my cmake command:

-Dparaview_SOURCE_SELECTION="5.3.0-RC1”

and I get this error when doing a clean build.

-- Detecting CXX compile features - done
-- Check size of void*
-- Check size of void* - done
CMake Error at superbuild/cmake/SuperbuildRevisionMacros.cmake:338
(message):
  The 5.3.0-RC1 source selection for paraview does not exist.
Call Stack (most recent call first):
  versions.cmake:62 (superbuild_set_selectable_source)
  superbuild/CMakeLists.txt:96 (include)


I grepp’ed through the paraview-superbuild directory and I don’t see any
references to 5.3.





Rick Angelini
USArmy Research Laboratory
CISD/HPC Architectures Team
Phone:  410-278-6266




-Original Message-
From: Cory Quammen 
Date: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 at 10:07 AM
To: Rick Angelini 
Cc: "ben.boec...@kitware.com" , ParaView

Subject: Re: [Paraview] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Superbuild repo change?

All active links contained in this email were disabled.  Please verify the
identity of the sender, and confirm the authenticity of all links
contained within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a
Web browser.  






Hi Rick,

>From paraview-superbuild master (remember to run 'git submodule
update' after updating master), you should be able to set
paraview_SOURCE_SELECTION to 5.3.0-RC1. Then just configure and build.

These directions are distilled from the README.md file in the
superbuild directory [1]. Relevant excerpt:

"3. Another option is to use a source tarball of a ParaView release.
For that, set paraview_SOURCE_SELECTION to the version to build such
as 5.2.0. The superbuild offers the lastest stable release as well as
release candidate in preparation for the release. This is the best way
to build a released version of ParaView."

For each release candidate and release, we add an entry under
paraview_SOURCE_SELECTION that you can select.

Let us know if you run into problems.

Thanks,
Cory

[1] 
Caution-https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview-superbuild/blob/master
/README.md

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 8:42 AM, Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY
RDECOM ARL (US)  wrote:
> What are the instructions for using PVSB to build the 5.3- RC ?
> 
> Rick Angelini
> USArmy Research Laboratory
> CISD/HPC Architectures Team
> Phone:  410-278-6266
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Boeckel 
> Reply-To: "ben.boec...@kitware.com" 
> Date: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 11:34 AM
> To: Rick Angelini 
> Cc: ParaView 
> Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [Paraview] Superbuild repo change?
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 13:50:13 +, Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV
> USARMY RDECOM ARL (US) wrote:
>> I did a fresh pull of the ParaView superbuild repository, and now I
>>can’t do
>> a clean build of PV 5.2.0 on my Mac (OSX 10.9.5).
>>
>> First, I had to remove the entries for “qt” and “scipy" in the
>> CMakeLists.txt:
>
> You need to run `git submodule update` to update the common-superbuild
> bits.
>
>> After removing those entries, the cmake completes and the build starts
>>and
>> passes out in qt4.
>> I’m not sure why it’s complaining about OS X 10.7 or later?)
>
> What version of Xcode are you using?
>
> --Ben
>
> ___
> Powered by Caution-www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>Caution-http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
>Caution-http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Search the list archives at:
>Caution-http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> Caution-http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>



-- 
Cory Quammen
Staff R Engineer
Kitware, Inc.


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] Compiling Paraview 5.2 GCC 4.8 vtkOpenGLRenderWindow.cxx, line 641

2017-02-21 Thread Ben Boeckel 
> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Nabil Ghodbane
> >  wrote:
> > > OK many thanks,; I am trying to use the Superbuild now.
> > > I can see that it is downloading Python 2.7.11. Is there a particular
> > reason
> > > to use this version instead of the 2.7.12?

Haven't gotten around to updating to 2.7.12 (we're behind in updating
dependencies).

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 16:18:48 +0100, Nabil Ghodbane wrote:
> ok thanks for the hint. I obviously missed this point. I will try again.
> I tried with the Python which is downloaded by the Paraview builder and i
> am hiting a new issue about libQtLucene.so
> Is this a known issue ?

There's a flag qt4_WORK_AROUND_BROKEN_ASSISTANT_BUILD you can set (it's
marked as advanced, so it is hidden by default). Details are here if
you're interested:


https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/common-superbuild/blob/master/projects/qt4.common.cmake#L5

--Ben
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] Compiling Paraview 5.2 GCC 4.8 vtkOpenGLRenderWindow.cxx, line 641

2017-02-21 Thread Nabil Ghodbane 
ok thanks for the hint. I obviously missed this point. I will try again.
I tried with the Python which is downloaded by the Paraview builder and i
am hiting a new issue about libQtLucene.so
Is this a known issue ?
Here are my settings:
gcc version 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-4) (GCC)
cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS Linux release 7.2.1511 (Core)

ccmake flags:
ENABLE_qt4   ON
USE_SYSTEM_qt4   OFF
Note, that I can see a compilation failure with the following error message:

the compilation fails with:
/usr/bin/ld: warning: libQtCLucene.so.4, needed by
/root/postlabs/build/superbuild/qt4/build/lib/libQtHelp.so, not found (try
using -rpath or -rpath-link)
/root/postlabs/build/superbuild/qt4/build/lib/libQtHelp.so: undefined
reference to `QCLuceneIndexWriter::~QCLuceneIndexWriter()'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
gmake[7]: *** [../../../../bin/assistant] Error 1
gmake[6]: *** [sub-assistant-make_default-ordered] Error 2
gmake[5]: *** [sub-tools-make_default-ordered] Error 2
gmake[4]: *** [sub-assistant-make_default-ordered] Error 2
gmake[3]: *** [sub-tools-make_default-ordered] Error 2
CMake Error at /root/postlabs/build/superbuild/sb-qt4-build.cmake:43
(message):


Nabil Ghodbane (Ph. D. Habil*.*)
Phone: +33 6 34 42 33 43
Mailto: nabil.ghodb...@gmail.com


On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit <
utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Nabil Ghodbane
>  wrote:
> > OK many thanks,; I am trying to use the Superbuild now.
> > I can see that it is downloading Python 2.7.11. Is there a particular
> reason
> > to use this version instead of the 2.7.12?
>
> You can change the superbuild to use system Python i.e Python on your
> system. See docs here
> (https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview-superbuild)
> Setting CMake variable USE_SYSTEM_python to ON will use whatever is
> instralled on your system.
>
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] Compiling Paraview 5.2 GCC 4.8 vtkOpenGLRenderWindow.cxx, line 641

2017-02-21 Thread Utkarsh Ayachit 
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Nabil Ghodbane
 wrote:
> OK many thanks,; I am trying to use the Superbuild now.
> I can see that it is downloading Python 2.7.11. Is there a particular reason
> to use this version instead of the 2.7.12?

You can change the superbuild to use system Python i.e Python on your
system. See docs here
(https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview-superbuild)
Setting CMake variable USE_SYSTEM_python to ON will use whatever is
instralled on your system.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Superbuild repo change?

2017-02-21 Thread Cory Quammen 
Hi Rick,

From paraview-superbuild master (remember to run 'git submodule
update' after updating master), you should be able to set
paraview_SOURCE_SELECTION to 5.3.0-RC1. Then just configure and build.

These directions are distilled from the README.md file in the
superbuild directory [1]. Relevant excerpt:

"3. Another option is to use a source tarball of a ParaView release.
For that, set paraview_SOURCE_SELECTION to the version to build such
as 5.2.0. The superbuild offers the lastest stable release as well as
release candidate in preparation for the release. This is the best way
to build a released version of ParaView."

For each release candidate and release, we add an entry under
paraview_SOURCE_SELECTION that you can select.

Let us know if you run into problems.

Thanks,
Cory

[1] 
https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview-superbuild/blob/master/README.md

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 8:42 AM, Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY
RDECOM ARL (US)  wrote:
> What are the instructions for using PVSB to build the 5.3- RC ?
> 
> Rick Angelini
> USArmy Research Laboratory
> CISD/HPC Architectures Team
> Phone:  410-278-6266
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Boeckel 
> Reply-To: "ben.boec...@kitware.com" 
> Date: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 11:34 AM
> To: Rick Angelini 
> Cc: ParaView 
> Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [Paraview] Superbuild repo change?
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 13:50:13 +, Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV
> USARMY RDECOM ARL (US) wrote:
>> I did a fresh pull of the ParaView superbuild repository, and now I
>>can’t do
>> a clean build of PV 5.2.0 on my Mac (OSX 10.9.5).
>>
>> First, I had to remove the entries for “qt” and “scipy" in the
>> CMakeLists.txt:
>
> You need to run `git submodule update` to update the common-superbuild
> bits.
>
>> After removing those entries, the cmake completes and the build starts
>>and
>> passes out in qt4.
>> I’m not sure why it’s complaining about OS X 10.7 or later?)
>
> What version of Xcode are you using?
>
> --Ben
>
> ___
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>



-- 
Cory Quammen
Staff R Engineer
Kitware, Inc.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] Compiling Paraview 5.2 GCC 4.8 vtkOpenGLRenderWindow.cxx, line 641

2017-02-21 Thread Nabil Ghodbane 
OK many thanks,; I am trying to use the Superbuild now.
I can see that it is downloading Python 2.7.11. Is there a particular
reason to use this version instead of the 2.7.12?
And how can I switch to the latest stable release ?
Or is this against the super build approach ?
apologize if my question is non sens

thanks.


Nabil Ghodbane (Ph. D. Habil*.*)
Phone: +33 6 34 42 33 43
Mailto: nabil.ghodb...@gmail.com


On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Ken Martin  wrote:

> You need OpenGL version 3.2, try updating mesa to version 12 or later.
> (11.2 should work also if you are not using OSMesa)
>
> Thanks
> Ken
>
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Nabil Ghodbane 
> wrote:
>
>> dear experts,
>> I am trying to compile Paraview 5.2 with gcc 4.8 + Qt 4.8 + VTK 5.10 +
>> Python 2.7 (available with Miniconda) on a CentOS 7 machine.
>>
>> it compiles well, but I fail to run the Paraview; Paraview starts, but
>> when I try to open a file, I get:
>>
>> ERROR: In 
>> /root/ParaView-v5.2.0/VTK/Rendering/OpenGL2/vtkOpenGLRenderWindow.cxx,
>> line 641
>> vtkXOpenGLRenderWindow (0x1b85d60): GL version 2.1 with the gpu_shader4
>> extension is not supported by your graphics driver but is required for the
>> new OpenGL rendering backend. Please update your OpenGL driver. If you are
>> using Mesa please make sure you have version 10.6.5 or later and make sure
>> your driver in Mesa supports OpenGL 3.2.
>>
>> could some expert either point me to some standard approach, I need to
>> use, or point me to the relevant cmake flags to set?
>> thanks for your valuable help
>>
>>
>> Nabil Ghodbane (Ph. D. Habil*.*)
>> Phone: +33 6 34 42 33 43 <+33%206%2034%2042%2033%2043>
>> Mailto: nabil.ghodb...@gmail.com
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>>
>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>>
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Ken Martin PhD
> Chairman & CFO
> Kitware Inc.
> 28 Corporate Drive
> Clifton Park NY 12065
> 518 371 3971
>
> This communication, including all attachments, contains confidential and
> legally privileged information, and it is intended only for the use of the
> addressee.  Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are
> not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any
> action taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you
> received this communication in error please notify us immediately and
> destroy the original message.  Thank you.
>
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] Compiling Paraview 5.2 GCC 4.8 vtkOpenGLRenderWindow.cxx, line 641

2017-02-21 Thread Ken Martin 
You need OpenGL version 3.2, try updating mesa to version 12 or later.
(11.2 should work also if you are not using OSMesa)

Thanks
Ken

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 8:39 AM, Nabil Ghodbane 
wrote:

> dear experts,
> I am trying to compile Paraview 5.2 with gcc 4.8 + Qt 4.8 + VTK 5.10 +
> Python 2.7 (available with Miniconda) on a CentOS 7 machine.
>
> it compiles well, but I fail to run the Paraview; Paraview starts, but
> when I try to open a file, I get:
>
> ERROR: In 
> /root/ParaView-v5.2.0/VTK/Rendering/OpenGL2/vtkOpenGLRenderWindow.cxx,
> line 641
> vtkXOpenGLRenderWindow (0x1b85d60): GL version 2.1 with the gpu_shader4
> extension is not supported by your graphics driver but is required for the
> new OpenGL rendering backend. Please update your OpenGL driver. If you are
> using Mesa please make sure you have version 10.6.5 or later and make sure
> your driver in Mesa supports OpenGL 3.2.
>
> could some expert either point me to some standard approach, I need to
> use, or point me to the relevant cmake flags to set?
> thanks for your valuable help
>
>
> Nabil Ghodbane (Ph. D. Habil*.*)
> Phone: +33 6 34 42 33 43 <+33%206%2034%2042%2033%2043>
> Mailto: nabil.ghodb...@gmail.com
>
>
> ___
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/
> opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
>


-- 
Ken Martin PhD
Chairman & CFO
Kitware Inc.
28 Corporate Drive
Clifton Park NY 12065
518 371 3971

This communication, including all attachments, contains confidential and
legally privileged information, and it is intended only for the use of the
addressee.  Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are
not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any
action taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you
received this communication in error please notify us immediately and
destroy the original message.  Thank you.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Superbuild repo change?

2017-02-21 Thread Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US) 
What are the instructions for using PVSB to build the 5.3- RC ?

Rick Angelini
USArmy Research Laboratory
CISD/HPC Architectures Team
Phone:  410-278-6266




-Original Message-
From: Ben Boeckel 
Reply-To: "ben.boec...@kitware.com" 
Date: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 11:34 AM
To: Rick Angelini 
Cc: ParaView 
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [Paraview] Superbuild repo change?

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 13:50:13 +, Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV
USARMY RDECOM ARL (US) wrote:
> I did a fresh pull of the ParaView superbuild repository, and now I
>can’t do
> a clean build of PV 5.2.0 on my Mac (OSX 10.9.5).
> 
> First, I had to remove the entries for “qt” and “scipy" in the
> CMakeLists.txt:

You need to run `git submodule update` to update the common-superbuild
bits.

> After removing those entries, the cmake completes and the build starts
>and
> passes out in qt4.
> I’m not sure why it’s complaining about OS X 10.7 or later?)

What version of Xcode are you using?

--Ben


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] Compiling Paraview 5.2 GCC 4.8 vtkOpenGLRenderWindow.cxx, line 641

2017-02-21 Thread Nabil Ghodbane 
In additon to my previous message, if I run Vagrind, I get:
ERROR: In /root/ParaView-v5.2.0/VTK/Rendering/OpenGL2/vtkShaderProgram.cxx,
line 395
vtkShaderProgram (0x434d1f0): 0:39(12): error: extension
`GL_EXT_gpu_shader4' unsupported in fragment shader


Nabil Ghodbane (Ph. D. Habil*.*)
Phone: +33 6 34 42 33 43
Mailto: nabil.ghodb...@gmail.com


On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Nabil Ghodbane 
wrote:

> dear experts,
> I am trying to compile Paraview 5.2 with gcc 4.8 + Qt 4.8 + VTK 5.10 +
> Python 2.7 (available with Miniconda) on a CentOS 7 machine.
>
> it compiles well, but I fail to run the Paraview; Paraview starts, but
> when I try to open a file, I get:
>
> ERROR: In 
> /root/ParaView-v5.2.0/VTK/Rendering/OpenGL2/vtkOpenGLRenderWindow.cxx,
> line 641
> vtkXOpenGLRenderWindow (0x1b85d60): GL version 2.1 with the gpu_shader4
> extension is not supported by your graphics driver but is required for the
> new OpenGL rendering backend. Please update your OpenGL driver. If you are
> using Mesa please make sure you have version 10.6.5 or later and make sure
> your driver in Mesa supports OpenGL 3.2.
>
> could some expert either point me to some standard approach, I need to
> use, or point me to the relevant cmake flags to set?
> thanks for your valuable help
>
>
> Nabil Ghodbane (Ph. D. Habil*.*)
> Phone: +33 6 34 42 33 43 <06%2034%2042%2033%2043>
> Mailto: nabil.ghodb...@gmail.com
>
>
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

[Paraview] Compiling Paraview 5.2 GCC 4.8 vtkOpenGLRenderWindow.cxx, line 641

2017-02-21 Thread Nabil Ghodbane 
dear experts,
I am trying to compile Paraview 5.2 with gcc 4.8 + Qt 4.8 + VTK 5.10 +
Python 2.7 (available with Miniconda) on a CentOS 7 machine.

it compiles well, but I fail to run the Paraview; Paraview starts, but when
I try to open a file, I get:

ERROR: In
/root/ParaView-v5.2.0/VTK/Rendering/OpenGL2/vtkOpenGLRenderWindow.cxx, line
641
vtkXOpenGLRenderWindow (0x1b85d60): GL version 2.1 with the gpu_shader4
extension is not supported by your graphics driver but is required for the
new OpenGL rendering backend. Please update your OpenGL driver. If you are
using Mesa please make sure you have version 10.6.5 or later and make sure
your driver in Mesa supports OpenGL 3.2.

could some expert either point me to some standard approach, I need to use,
or point me to the relevant cmake flags to set?
thanks for your valuable help


Nabil Ghodbane (Ph. D. Habil*.*)
Phone: +33 6 34 42 33 43
Mailto: nabil.ghodb...@gmail.com
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] How to increase render quality for exodus mesh file

2017-02-21 Thread TJ Corona 
Hi Florian,

Would you be able to send a representative data file (either .vtu or .exo) 
along with the image?

Sincerely,
T.J.

Thomas J. Corona, Ph.D.
Kitware, Inc.
R Engineer
21 Corporate Drive
Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662
Phone: 518-881-4443

> On Feb 21, 2017, at 8:20 AM, Konrad, Florian  wrote:
> 
> Hello everyone,
> I have a result of a numerical simulation saved in an exodus-file. This file 
> contains an unstructured mesh made of tetrahedral elements and the simulation 
> results as elemental or nodal values.
> My problem is that the quality of the visualization of my exodus file is not 
> the best. As you can see in the following screenshot the edges of the 
> features look really bad. http://imgur.com/a/SBT4r 
> Is there a way to increase the quality somewhere or does somebody know why it 
> looks like this? The quality of the edges seems to be related to the angle in 
> which I view them.
> Greetings
> Florian
> ___
> Powered by www.kitware.com 
> 
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html 
> 
> 
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView 
> 
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView 
> 
> 
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview 
> 
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

[Paraview] How to increase render quality for exodus mesh file

2017-02-21 Thread Konrad, Florian 
Hello everyone,
I have a result of a numerical simulation saved in an exodus-file. This file 
contains an unstructured mesh made of tetrahedral elements and the simulation 
results as elemental or nodal values.
My problem is that the quality of the visualization of my exodus file is not 
the best. As you can see in the following screenshot the edges of the features 
look really bad. http://imgur.com/a/SBT4r
Is there a way to increase the quality somewhere or does somebody know why it 
looks like this? The quality of the edges seems to be related to the angle in 
which I view them.
Greetings
Florian
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview