Re: [Paraview] Attach arrows onto streamlines/stream tubes more smoothly
Indeed, using Cone glyph gives much better results, and tweaking by "Stride" is very helpful! Thank you, Andy and Utkarsh. On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit < utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com> wrote: > To control spacing of the glyphs, on the Glyph's properties panel you > can change the Glyph Mode to "Every Nth Point" and then tweak the > "Stride". > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 8:12 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit > wrote: > > Try changing the "Glyph Type" to Cone. See attached image. > > > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 6:16 PM, Andy Bauer > wrote: > >> I think it is because you have set the Shaft radius to 0. The start of > the > >> arrow doesn't appear because of this and I'm suspecting that the start > of > >> the arrow is centered along the streamline. Maybe try using using > either a > >> non-zero value for the Shaft radius that is bigger than the Tube radius > or > >> use the Cone glyph type instead. > >> > >> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 5:59 PM, Liang Wang > wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Andy, > >>> > >>> The results are similar if I apply glyph on streamlines directly (see > the > >>> attached image). > >>> > >>> I guess the difficulty part is that arrow heads are not easily > centered on > >>> lines/tubes? > >>> > >>> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Andy Bauer > >>> wrote: > > Hi, > > How does it look if you Glyph the streamlines themselves instead of > the > tubes? > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Liang Wang > wrote: > > > > By using the arrow glyph filter on the lines/tubes, the arrows are > often > > slightly dislocated (and thus slightly misaligned) from the tubes > themselves > > (see the attached image). > > > > In comparison, I am trying to get images like > > http://www.tecplot.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/fstream.jpg or > > https://i.stack.imgur.com/z8nkm.png > > > > Logically, the arrows could have been an attribute of the > > streamlines/stream tubes? > > > > ___ > > Powered by www.kitware.com > > > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at > > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html > > > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: > > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView > > > > Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView > > > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > > http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview > > > > >>> > >> > >> > >> ___ > >> Powered by www.kitware.com > >> > >> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at > >> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html > >> > >> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: > >> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView > >> > >> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView > >> > >> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > >> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview > >> > ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
Re: [Paraview] Paraview 5.2.0 compilation with support for HMD and Python
Just to slightly thread jack for a second, will there be continued development for both Oculus and Vive? I'm leaning towards a Vive and it looks like that was the one originally recommended. Maybe more importantly, and thoughts on whether we're going to see this working on Linux any time soon. It seems like vrserver is working on linux but there is no full VRsteam support. Anyone had success using a Vive on a *nix machine with a windows VM (I mean usable success, with minimum latency). Thanks Ken! -ashton On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 6:36 AM, Ken Martin wrote: > > Hi Guillaume, > > I hope to get some time to clean up some issues with the code and to merge > it into PV master. It will probably be a bit though as right now I am > taking another pass at the OpenVR VTK code which it is based on to add a > medical (volume rendering) example and a few options such as a floor etc. > Once that is done, I'll try to get to another pass on the PV code and get > it merged. For now the code can be found at > > https://gitlab.kitware.com/ken-martin/paraview/commits/add_vr_2 > > but I believe that is old and not rebased to 5.2.0. Best bet would be to > rebase that to 5.2.0 and then update VTK to master to get the latest OpenVR > SDK fixes and then hope the two work/compile together. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 9:23 AM, Cory Quammen > wrote: > >> Hi Guillaume, >> >> Ken Martin is responsible for this cool version of ParaView. I'm not >> sure that the code is ready for release just yet - Ken can tell you >> more. >> >> Thanks, >> Cory >> >> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 5:55 AM, Guillaume Jacquenot >> wrote: >> > I have seen that Kitware developers have proposed a ParaView version >> with >> > support for Oculus Rift and HTC Vive HMD. >> > And it looks awesome, and opens a wide range of opportunities. >> > >> > https://blog.kitware.com/taking-paraview-into-virtual-reality/ >> > >> > However, the proposed version does not embed Python scripting >> possibilities. >> > >> > I would like to benefit from these functionnalities. >> > >> > Can anyone give me some advice on: >> > - where to find the source code with the support for HMD >> > - how to compile to the code with Python support >> > >> > The best would be a link to an installation file, but I am ready to >> compile >> > it! >> > >> > Thanks >> > >> > Guillaume Jacquenot >> > >> > ___ >> > Powered by www.kitware.com >> > >> > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at >> > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html >> > >> > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: >> > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView >> > >> > Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView >> > >> > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: >> > http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Cory Quammen >> Staff R&D Engineer >> Kitware, Inc. >> > > > > -- > Ken Martin PhD > Chairman & CFO > Kitware Inc. > 28 Corporate Drive > Clifton Park NY 12065 > 518 371 3971 <(518)%20371-3971> > > This communication, including all attachments, contains confidential and > legally privileged information, and it is intended only for the use of the > addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are > not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any > action taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you > received this communication in error please notify us immediately and > destroy the original message. Thank you. > > ___ > Powered by www.kitware.com > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/ > opensource/opensource.html > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView > > Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview > > ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
Re: [Paraview] Attach arrows onto streamlines/stream tubes more smoothly
I think it is because you have set the Shaft radius to 0. The start of the arrow doesn't appear because of this and I'm suspecting that the start of the arrow is centered along the streamline. Maybe try using using either a non-zero value for the Shaft radius that is bigger than the Tube radius or use the Cone glyph type instead. On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 5:59 PM, Liang Wang wrote: > Hi Andy, > > The results are similar if I apply glyph on streamlines directly (see the > attached image). > > I guess the difficulty part is that arrow heads are not easily centered on > lines/tubes? > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Andy Bauer > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> How does it look if you Glyph the streamlines themselves instead of the >> tubes? >> >> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Liang Wang wrote: >> >>> By using the arrow glyph filter on the lines/tubes, the arrows are often >>> slightly dislocated (and thus slightly misaligned) from the tubes >>> themselves (see the attached image). >>> >>> In comparison, I am trying to get images like >>> http://www.tecplot.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/fstream.jpg or >>> https://i.stack.imgur.com/z8nkm.png >>> >>> Logically, the arrows could have been an attribute of the >>> streamlines/stream tubes? >>> >>> ___ >>> Powered by www.kitware.com >>> >>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at >>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html >>> >>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: >>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView >>> >>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView >>> >>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: >>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview >>> >>> >> > ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
Re: [Paraview] Attach arrows onto streamlines/stream tubes more smoothly
Hi, How does it look if you Glyph the streamlines themselves instead of the tubes? On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Liang Wang wrote: > By using the arrow glyph filter on the lines/tubes, the arrows are often > slightly dislocated (and thus slightly misaligned) from the tubes > themselves (see the attached image). > > In comparison, I am trying to get images like http://www.tecplot.com/wp- > content/uploads/2016/01/fstream.jpg or https://i.stack.imgur.com/z8nkm.png > > Logically, the arrows could have been an attribute of the > streamlines/stream tubes? > > ___ > Powered by www.kitware.com > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/ > opensource/opensource.html > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView > > Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview > > ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
Re: [Paraview] Help on SPHVolumeInterpolator
Carola the answer is "soon". ParaView's GUI already enables the setting of the so-called Cuttoff Array. In the GUI (I am assuming you use version 5.3), there should be a setting for the Density and the Mass arrays. And just below it, is the 3rd setting for the "smooting length" array. Unfortunately, we are waiting on a patch to the underlying VTK class vtkSPHInterpolator.cxx which currently has a small error preventing the correct setting. By the way, I strongly suggest that you use a version of ParaView compiled with OpenMP, or TBB. You will see great speed-ups on a multi-core node, since the Point Interpolators (Line, Plane, Volume) are all parallelized on-the-node. Until the patch is merged into VTK, and ParaView picks up the change, you will be limited to setting the Density and Mass arrays. (Unless you compile your own ParaView, and I can tell you how to edit the source code to enable the smoothing array.) - Jean/CSCS From: ParaView [paraview-boun...@paraview.org] on behalf of Ellinger, Carola [cellin...@lanl.gov] Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2017 6:47 PM To: paraview@paraview.org Subject: [Paraview] Help on SPHVolumeInterpolator Hello, I have astrophysical SPH (smoothed particle hydrodynamics) data that I want to interpolate for visualization in ParaView. I've found the SPHVolumeInterpolator filter to do that, but can this filter handle non-constant smoothing lengths of SPH particles for the interpolation? If so, how is this set? Due to the nature of the object I'm trying to visualize (a star), the smoothing lengths varies over a few orders of magnitude. Thank you for any help, Carola ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
[Paraview] Help on SPHVolumeInterpolator
Hello, I have astrophysical SPH (smoothed particle hydrodynamics) data that I want to interpolate for visualization in ParaView. I've found the SPHVolumeInterpolator filter to do that, but can this filter handle non-constant smoothing lengths of SPH particles for the interpolation? If so, how is this set? Due to the nature of the object I'm trying to visualize (a star), the smoothing lengths varies over a few orders of magnitude. Thank you for any help, Carola ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
Re: [Paraview] rendering window position on screen
It not really well supported, but something like the following may work on linux/windows: window = view.GetRenderWindow() window.SetPosition(450, 0) Utkarsh On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Marco Cisternino wrote: > Good morning, > I wrote a python script in order to process my data and to render the result > at the end. > To do this last step I call > > Render(myRenderView) > Interact() > > and the rendering window is open at the top left corner of my screen. > How can I change the position of the rendering window? > Thanks a lot for any hint. > Best regards, > > > Marco Cisternino, PhD > marco.cistern...@optimad.it > ___ > OPTIMAD Engineering srl > Via Giacinto Collegno 18, Torino, Italia. > +3901119719782 > www.optimad.it > > ___ > Powered by www.kitware.com > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView > > Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
[Paraview] rendering window position on screen
Good morning, I wrote a python script in order to process my data and to render the result at the end. To do this last step I call Render(myRenderView) Interact() and the rendering window is open at the top left corner of my screen. How can I change the position of the rendering window? Thanks a lot for any hint. Best regards, Marco Cisternino, PhD marco.cistern...@optimad.it ___ OPTIMAD Engineering srl Via Giacinto Collegno 18, Torino, Italia. +3901119719782 www.optimad.it ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
Re: [Paraview] XML tag for naming tensor components
Ruben, (apologies for the delayed reply) In the VTU XML, you can add component names as follows: for each of the components. Utkarsh On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Reuben Kraft wrote: > Hello, > > > > I am writing a VTU xml formatted file for a finite element program. I’m > trying to find the option to specify the component names in my DataArray xml > tag. For example, in paraview instead of listing the tensor values 0-5, I > would like them to say s_xx, s_yy, s_xx, etc. > > > > Does anyone know that tag to do this? I did not see it in the VTK manual. > > > > Thanks, > > Reuben > > > > > ___ > Powered by www.kitware.com > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView > > Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview > ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
Re: [Paraview] Potential Memory Error in CAVE mode
Faiz, Can you remind us about your setup again so that we can see if something can be done to reduce per rank memory requirements? Also, I am assuming the current setup works if the data is small? On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:47 AM Utkarsh Ayachit < utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com> wrote: > You may indeed be running into a limitation of current implementation. > To support fast rendering requirements for CAVE, ParaView duplicates > geometry between all rendering ranks. Seems like you're running out of > memory during that process. > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:10 PM, Faiz Abidi wrote: > > Hi again community! > > > > I have been testing Paraview 5.2.0 in a CAVE mode with pretty big data > (1+ > > billion points) while remotely connected to some HPC servers. > > > > PROBLEM: In CAVE mode, I get the below error when I try to change mode > from > > "Outline" to "Points". Same issue while doing other things as well like > > applying a Glyph (Sphere), etc. > > > > ERROR: terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::bad_alloc' > > what(): std::bad_alloc > > > > The same issue doesn't occur if I don't use the CAVE mode in that I > simple > > connect a Paraview client with the HPC servers and don't pass any pvx > file. > > > > I read some similar online discussions pointing towards memory issues but > > it's hard for me to believe that given a) I have hundreds of gigs of > memory > > and most of it remains empty even with my big data loaded, b) the issue > > doesn't occur when not in a CAVE mode. > > > > Anyone experienced any such similar issues? > > > > Thanks for all the help! > > -- > > Faiz Abidi | Master's Student at Virginia Tech | www.faizabidi.com | > > +1-540-998-6636 <(540)%20998-6636> > > > > ___ > > Powered by www.kitware.com > > > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at > > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html > > > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: > > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView > > > > Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView > > > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > > http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview > > > ___ > Powered by www.kitware.com > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView > > Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview > ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
Re: [Paraview] Potential Memory Error in CAVE mode
You may indeed be running into a limitation of current implementation. To support fast rendering requirements for CAVE, ParaView duplicates geometry between all rendering ranks. Seems like you're running out of memory during that process. On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:10 PM, Faiz Abidi wrote: > Hi again community! > > I have been testing Paraview 5.2.0 in a CAVE mode with pretty big data (1+ > billion points) while remotely connected to some HPC servers. > > PROBLEM: In CAVE mode, I get the below error when I try to change mode from > "Outline" to "Points". Same issue while doing other things as well like > applying a Glyph (Sphere), etc. > > ERROR: terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::bad_alloc' > what(): std::bad_alloc > > The same issue doesn't occur if I don't use the CAVE mode in that I simple > connect a Paraview client with the HPC servers and don't pass any pvx file. > > I read some similar online discussions pointing towards memory issues but > it's hard for me to believe that given a) I have hundreds of gigs of memory > and most of it remains empty even with my big data loaded, b) the issue > doesn't occur when not in a CAVE mode. > > Anyone experienced any such similar issues? > > Thanks for all the help! > -- > Faiz Abidi | Master's Student at Virginia Tech | www.faizabidi.com | > +1-540-998-6636 > > ___ > Powered by www.kitware.com > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView > > Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview > ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
Re: [Paraview] ParaView 5.3.0 released
My mistake, my push URL was incorrect when I pushed the tag. Should be fixed now. https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview-superbuild/tags Sorry for the trouble. Cory On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Ben Boeckel wrote: > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 17:58:18 -0400, Cory Quammen wrote: >> The superbuild was tagged with v5.3.0 this morning. > > That may be, but it seems you missed pushing it to the main repository > :) . > > --Ben -- Cory Quammen Staff R&D Engineer Kitware, Inc. ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
Re: [Paraview] ParaView 5.3.0 released
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 17:58:18 -0400, Cory Quammen wrote: > The superbuild was tagged with v5.3.0 this morning. That may be, but it seems you missed pushing it to the main repository :) . --Ben ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
Re: [Paraview] Remote rendering to multiple displays
In this case you will need to have a render server running on your client, and a data server running on your cluster. http://www.paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView:Server_Configuration#Case_Three:_Simple_connection_to_a_data-server.2Frender-server This should work, but will definitelly not be ideal since whole dataset will be transferred from the data server to the render server. Regards, Mathieu Westphal On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 8:30 PM, Léo Pessanha wrote: > I believe I was not clear. > > The 6 viewports I want to achieve cannot be in the GUI. They have to be > separate like when using a .pvx file in the server. > > The problem is when using a .pvx the viewports are open in the remote > machine, I want them to be open in the client machine. > > Best regards, > Leonardo Pessanha > > 2017-03-14 5:31 GMT-03:00 Mathieu Westphal : > >> 1) ParaView in client server mode with remote rendering enabled, >> connected to a pvserver on your cluster. Multiple viewports are not a >> problem. >> 2) X ParaView in client server mode with remote rendering enabled, >> connected to a pvserver in multi-client mode on your cluster. Multiple >> viewports are not a problem. >> >> Mathieu Westphal >> >> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 11:55 PM, Léo Pessanha < >> leonardopessanh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi! >>> >>> What would be the best approach in order to achieve this configurations: >>> >>> 1) Remote rendering in a cluster and one client with 6 >>> viewports(Cubemap) >>> >>> 2) Remote rendering in a cluster and X clients with X viewports >>> >>> Thanks in advance. >>> >>> ___ >>> Powered by www.kitware.com >>> >>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at >>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html >>> >>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: >>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView >>> >>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView >>> >>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: >>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview >>> >>> >> > ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
Re: [Paraview] ParaView 5.3.0 released
Sorry, this doesn't work for me: I start with a clean directory mkdir pv53 cd pv53 git clone --recursive https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview-superbuild.git cd paraview-superbuild git fetch --tags origin git checkout v5.3.0 -> error: pathspec 'v5.3.0' did not match any file(s) known to git. Fabian On 03/15/17 02:21, Cory Quammen wrote: git fetch --tags origin git checkout v5.3.0 On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 6:06 PM, Fabian Wein wrote: The superbuild was tagged with v5.3.0 this morning. I just did git clone —recursive https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview-superbuild.git cd paraview-superbuild git fetch origin git checkout v5.3.0 and got error: pathspec 'v5.3.0' did not match any file(s) known to git. Do I miss something? Thanks, Fabian Best regards, Cory On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Fabian Wein wrote: On behalf of the ParaView team, I am happy to announce that ParaView 5.3.0 has been released and is ready to download from http://www.paraview.org/download Release notes for ParaView 5.3.0 are available at https://blog.kitware.com/paraview-5-3-0-release-notes/ Please add the tag to the superbuild. BTW: My whole office is grateful for the reload (F5) and autoscaled warping of PV 5.2 (at least compared to PV 5.0)!! :) Thanks to the folks at kitware for the really cool software! Fabian ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
