Re: [Paraview] Bug or feature?

2017-05-09 Thread Andy Bauer
Hi,

Please keep the discussions on the mailing list so that everyone that wants
to can follow along.

I'm able to volume render by components as well as magnitude. It may be
that you need to play around with the Color Map Editor to get things as
you'd like them to look.

I'm not an expert on volume rendering but it seems to me like something is
wrong with your cell connectivity when I use the Extract Surface filter.
It's possible that this is also causing issues with the volume rendering
but I couldn't say for sure.

Andy

On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 5:20 AM, Cornelis Bockemühl <
cornelis.bockemu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> This is my example, mostly stripped down to the core of the problem: see
> the Col2comp data array that has 2 components (see attached zipped vtu
> file). The model has something more than 600 cells, and in both components
> (comp1 and comp2) many of them are 0. In comp2 it is even all except 18 -
> and this can easily be seen in a "surface" view: almost everything is blue
> == 0. It can also be analyzed with cut and slice filters, so it is also the
> case "inside" the model.
>
> Now with a volume view this is completely different: comp2 looks as if
> indeed many cells have values "above blue"!
>
> But I must admit that initially I did not look well enough: also the
> volume view changes a little if I change between "magnitude", "comp1" and
> "comp2" - only that it does not look like matching the surface views at
> all: all cells except one actually have a 0 in one of the two components -
> which should be clearly visible also in the volume view I suppose!
>
> I could reproduce this behaviour not only on my self-compiled version 5.3
> paraview, but also in a downloaded and installed binary version 5.1.2
> (64-bit).
>
> In other words: I am a bit confused now! ;-)
>
> Regards,
> Cornelis
>
>
>
> 2017-05-07 0:49 GMT+02:00 Andy Bauer :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am able to do a volume visualization for each component of a 3
>> component array (i.e. a vector) of both point and cell data in PV 5.3. This
>> was done with a both a vtkImageData and a vtkUnstructuredGrid. Once I
>> choose my 3 component array for volume rendering in the upper left corner
>> of the GUI, the default is the Magnitude but I can switch to each component
>> as well with the drop down dialog that is just to the right of where I
>> choose which array I want to pseudo-color by.
>>
>> Any chance you could share your dataset and specific instructions on how
>> you're doing things? Alternatively, you can use the Calculator filter to
>> extract one component of your multi-component array but this is a bit
>> computationally wasteful.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Andy
>>
>> On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Cornelis Bockemühl <
>> cornelis.bockemu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Paraview users and experts,
>>>
>>> In some project I am generating a dataset that has a multi-component
>>> column as a result, with a variable number of columns depending on the
>>> problem. These data are "cell data" of some "unstructured grid", and I can
>>> nicely visualize it in Paraview, component by component.
>>>
>>> Only with the visualization as a "volume" I have problems: It seems that
>>> with this you can only visualize the "magnitude", while switching between
>>> the components does not work! This works only in other viewing modes, but
>>> the "volume" is sometimes very useful because you can look "inside" the
>>> volume.
>>>
>>> Now I am asking myself if this is a bug (with a certain chance to have
>>> it fixed or even fix it myself...) or a feature?
>>>
>>> I mean: the fact that "magnitude" is the default for displaying
>>> multi-component arrays already gives some hint in the direction: this type
>>> of columns is mostly intended to be used as coordinates! Which is actually
>>> not my case.
>>>
>>> Technically I could of course switch to just generating a set of
>>> single-component arrays instead of one multi-component array. I only did it
>>> otherwise because the columns are very closely related, so it looked like a
>>> good idea initially...
>>>
>>> Any hint or experience?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Cornelis
>>>
>>> PS: I am using Paraview 5.3 on Windows 64bit
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cornelis Bockemühl
>>> Basel, Schweiz
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>
>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>
>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
>>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>>>
>>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>>>
>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cornelis Bockemühl
> Basel, Schweiz
>
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaVie

Re: [Paraview] Visualization ternary saturation

2017-05-09 Thread Moreland, Kenneth
Aha! I figured out the issue. Yes, ParaView correctly shows floating point 
colors when in the Surface representation, but it does not work for the Slice 
representation. (I happened to be creating data on a Mandelbrot source.)

I raised a bug: https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/issues/17423

-Ken

From: Dan Lipsa [mailto:dan.li...@kitware.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2017 7:59 AM
To: Quammen, Cory (External Contacts) 
Cc: Moreland, Kenneth ; Waldon, Shawn (External Contacts) 
; ParaView 
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Paraview] Visualization ternary saturation

Hi all,

Indeed, rather than supporting only 'unsigned char' for direct color mapping - 
using color mode VTK_COLOR_MODE_DEFAULT, all integer and floating point types 
can be used for direct color mapping using the color mode 
VTK_COLOR_MODE_DIRECT_SCALARS.
Integer type colors should be between 0-255 and floating point colors should be 
between 0-1.

Dan


On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 10:16 PM, Cory Quammen 
mailto:cory.quam...@kitware.com>> wrote:
> I tried it your way in ParaView 5.3.0, and it did not work correctly. Are
> you sure this is implemented in 5.3 and not a new feature in the upcoming
> 5.4?

Ken,

This was implemented some time ago. In 5.3.0, I could do the following:

* Add Sphere Source
* Add Programmable Filter with the Script set to

A = inputs[0].PointData['Normals'][:,0]
B = inputs[0].PointData['Normals'][:,1]
C = inputs[0].PointData['Normals'][:,2]
colors = numpy.empty((len(A),3), dtype='float')
colors[:,0] = A
colors[:,1] = B
colors[:,2] = C
output.PointData.append(colors, 'colors')

* Turn off Map Scalars

You could also skip this silly use of the Programmable Filter
altogether and color the Sphere source by 'Normals', then turn Map
Scalars off.

I believe the capability to treat floating-point arrays of 3-tuples
was added to VTK in commit

commit 00de9a942ff74e797fbe4cd8c67307c8065cdade
Author: Dan Lipsa mailto:dan.li...@kitware.com>>
Date:   Thu Nov 20 13:35:35 2014 -0500

Add VTK_COLOR_MODE_DIRECT_SCALARS. See vtkScalarsToColors::MapScalars.

- Cory

> From: Shawn Waldon 
> [mailto:shawn.wal...@kitware.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 12:11 PM
> To: Moreland, Kenneth mailto:kmo...@sandia.gov>>
> Cc: Thomas Oliveira 
> mailto:thomas.olive...@gmail.com>>; ParaView
> mailto:paraview@paraview.org>>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Paraview] Visualization ternary saturation
>
>
>
> Ken beat me to answering this one... I'll just add that if the data is
> floating point in the range [0, 1], you don't need to convert it to uint8 or
> multiply by 255.  Just creating a floating point vector will give the same
> result.  This is a more recent extension of the functionality: I know it
> works in 5.3 and master but I'm not sure how many versions back support it.
>
> A = inputs[0].CellData['A']
>
> B = inputs[0].CellData['B']
>
> C = inputs[0].CellData['C']
>
> colors = numpy.empty((len(A),3), dtype='float')
>
> colors[:,0] = A
>
> colors[:,1] = B
>
> colors[:,2] = C
>
> output.CellData.append(colors, 'colors')
>
>
> HTH,
>
> Shawn
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Moreland, Kenneth 
> mailto:kmo...@sandia.gov>> wrote:
>
> ParaView does not directly support ternary color maps, but if you create a
> field of colors (represented by three unsigned chars), then you can render
> those colors directly by turning off the Map Scalars option. You can create
> these colors with a Programmable Filter with a script like the following:
>
>
>
> A = inputs[0].CellData['A']
>
> B = inputs[0].CellData['B']
>
> C = inputs[0].CellData['C']
>
> colors = numpy.empty((len(A),3), dtype='uint8')
>
> colors[:,0] = A*255
>
> colors[:,1] = B*255
>
> colors[:,2] = C*255
>
> output.CellData.append(colors, 'colors')
>
>
>
> Once you apply that script, color by the new “colors” array and uncheck the
> box marked “Map Scalars” (it is an advanced option in the properties panel).
>
>
>
> -Ken
>
>
>
> From: ParaView 
> [mailto:paraview-boun...@paraview.org] 
> On Behalf Of Thomas
> Oliveira
> Sent: Saturday, May 6, 2017 7:24 AM
> To: ParaView mailto:paraview@paraview.org>>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Paraview] Visualization ternary saturation
>
>
>
> Dear all,
>
> Given three cell arrays (A,B,C) representation saturations (A+B+C = 1 for
> every cell) is it possible to generate a ternary saturation image like the
> one attached (obtained in
> http://www.esss.com.br/Kraken/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Ternary-Saturation.png)?
>
> In the figure, A, B, C are saturations of water, oil and gas.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Thomas Oliveira
>
>
> ___
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>
> Foll

[Paraview] Complex filters for structured meshes

2017-05-09 Thread David Ortley
Hello,

I work with a CFD code that uses a structured mesh.  We frequently want to
do math operations that require each cell to have knowledge of its
neighbors.  Things such as a calculating the max of a certain variable, or
a gradient in a given direction.

I'm not sure the best way to accomplish this.  I have a code snippet for
use in the programmable filter that I use (copied below), but its behavior
is similar to the calculator in that it works on individual cells without
knowledge of cell neighbors.

Can somebody A) critique my skeleton code below to let me know if I could
write it better and B) help me with figuring out a method (any method) that
has visibility of neighbor cells?

Thanks

-David Ortley


# Programmable filter snippet:
pdi=self.GetInput()
pdo=self.GetOutput()

numCells = pdi.GetNumberOfCells()
cells = pdi.GetCellData()

# Some array already in the calc results that I'm going to reason on
# say it's pressure or energy or something
orig_array = cells.GetArray("orig_array")

# Storing
new_array = vtk.vtkDoubleArray()
new_array.SetName("new_array")

for i in range(numCells):
# do some work
blah  = pkovpr.GetValue(i) * 1.23456789
# store as new val in array
new_array.InsertNextValue(blah)

# Add the array I just created to the output so Paraview can do stuff with
it
pdo.GetCellData().AddArray(betaMax)
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview


Re: [Paraview] ParaView 5.4.0 Release Candidate 1 binaries are available for download

2017-05-09 Thread Zach Davis
All,

Apologies, it appears simply restarting resolved the issue for me.

Best Regards,



Zach

> On May 9, 2017, at 8:49 AM, Matthieu Vitse  wrote:
> 
> Hi Zach and Cory,
> 
> I’m also on macOS 10.12.4 and everything seems to work fine for me.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> —
> Matt
> 
> Matthieu VITSE  | Post-doctorant
> Laboratoire de Mécanique et Technologie
> +33(0)6 24 09 12 91   |  
> vi...@lmt.ens-cachan.fr 
> ENS Cachan - 61 avenue du Président Wilson 94235 Cachan CEDEX 
> 
> www.ens-paris-saclay.fr 
>  
>> Le 9 mai 2017 à 15:22, Zach Davis > > a écrit :
>> 
>> Hi Cory,
>> 
>> I’m on macOS 10.12.4.
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>> 
>> 
>> Zach Davis
>> Pointwise®, Inc.
>> Sr. Engineer, Sales & Marketing
>> 213 South Jennings Avenue
>> Fort Worth, TX 76104-1107
>> 
>> E: zach.da...@pointwise.com 
>> P: (817) 377-2807 x1202
>> F: (817) 377-2799
>>      
>>   
>> 
>>> On May 8, 2017, at 9:31 PM, Cory Quammen >> > wrote:
>>> 
>>> Zach,
>>> 
>>> Thanks for your report. However, I can't seem to reproduce that on macOS 
>>> 10.11.6.
>>> 
>>> What version of macOS are you using? Could it be a permissions issue on 
>>> your system?
>>> 
>>> - Cory
>>> 
>>> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 5:38 PM, Zach Davis >> > wrote:
>>> Hi Cory,
>>> 
>>> I’ve downloaded the latest disk image for ParaView 5.4 RC-1 for macOS; 
>>> however, the image won’t open with an error message warning that there are 
>>> no mountable file systems.
>>> 
>>> Best Regards,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Zach Davis
>>> Pointwise®, Inc.
>>> Sr. Engineer, Sales & Marketing
>>> 213 South Jennings Avenue
>>> Fort Worth, TX 76104-1107
>>> 
>>> E: zach.da...@pointwise.com 
>>> P: (817) 377-2807 x1202 
>>> F: (817) 377-2799 
>>>      
>>>   
>>> 
 On May 8, 2017, at 10:18 AM, Cory Quammen >>> > wrote:
 
 On behalf of the ParaView development community, I am happy to
 announce that binaries and source code for ParaView 5.4.0-RC1 are
 available to download from
 
 http://www.paraview.org/download/ 
 
 Please let us know if you run into any problems with this release 
 candidate.
 
 Thank you,
 Cory
 
 --
 Cory Quammen
 Staff R&D Engineer
 Kitware, Inc.
 ___
 Powered by www.kitware.com 
 
 Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
 http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html 
 
 
 Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
 http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView 
 
 Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView 
 
 
 Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
 http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview 
 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Cory Quammen
>>> Staff R&D Engineer
>>> Kitware, Inc.
>> 
>> ___
>> Powered by www.kitware.com 
>> 
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html 
>> 
>> 
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView 
>> 
>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView 
>> 
>> 
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview 
>> 


signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview


Re: [Paraview] Visualization ternary saturation

2017-05-09 Thread Dan Lipsa
Hi all,

Indeed, rather than supporting only 'unsigned char' for direct color
mapping - using color mode VTK_COLOR_MODE_DEFAULT, all integer and floating
point types can be used for direct color mapping using the color mode
VTK_COLOR_MODE_DIRECT_SCALARS.
Integer type colors should be between 0-255 and floating point colors
should be between 0-1.

Dan


On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 10:16 PM, Cory Quammen 
wrote:

> > I tried it your way in ParaView 5.3.0, and it did not work correctly. Are
> > you sure this is implemented in 5.3 and not a new feature in the upcoming
> > 5.4?
>
> Ken,
>
> This was implemented some time ago. In 5.3.0, I could do the following:
>
> * Add Sphere Source
> * Add Programmable Filter with the Script set to
>
> A = inputs[0].PointData['Normals'][:,0]
> B = inputs[0].PointData['Normals'][:,1]
> C = inputs[0].PointData['Normals'][:,2]
> colors = numpy.empty((len(A),3), dtype='float')
> colors[:,0] = A
> colors[:,1] = B
> colors[:,2] = C
> output.PointData.append(colors, 'colors')
>
> * Turn off Map Scalars
>
> You could also skip this silly use of the Programmable Filter
> altogether and color the Sphere source by 'Normals', then turn Map
> Scalars off.
>
> I believe the capability to treat floating-point arrays of 3-tuples
> was added to VTK in commit
>
> commit 00de9a942ff74e797fbe4cd8c67307c8065cdade
> Author: Dan Lipsa 
> Date:   Thu Nov 20 13:35:35 2014 -0500
>
> Add VTK_COLOR_MODE_DIRECT_SCALARS. See vtkScalarsToColors::MapScalars.
>
> - Cory
>
> > From: Shawn Waldon [mailto:shawn.wal...@kitware.com]
> > Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 12:11 PM
> > To: Moreland, Kenneth 
> > Cc: Thomas Oliveira ; ParaView
> > 
> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Paraview] Visualization ternary saturation
> >
> >
> >
> > Ken beat me to answering this one... I'll just add that if the data is
> > floating point in the range [0, 1], you don't need to convert it to
> uint8 or
> > multiply by 255.  Just creating a floating point vector will give the
> same
> > result.  This is a more recent extension of the functionality: I know it
> > works in 5.3 and master but I'm not sure how many versions back support
> it.
> >
> > A = inputs[0].CellData['A']
> >
> > B = inputs[0].CellData['B']
> >
> > C = inputs[0].CellData['C']
> >
> > colors = numpy.empty((len(A),3), dtype='float')
> >
> > colors[:,0] = A
> >
> > colors[:,1] = B
> >
> > colors[:,2] = C
> >
> > output.CellData.append(colors, 'colors')
> >
> >
> > HTH,
> >
> > Shawn
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Moreland, Kenneth 
> wrote:
> >
> > ParaView does not directly support ternary color maps, but if you create
> a
> > field of colors (represented by three unsigned chars), then you can
> render
> > those colors directly by turning off the Map Scalars option. You can
> create
> > these colors with a Programmable Filter with a script like the following:
> >
> >
> >
> > A = inputs[0].CellData['A']
> >
> > B = inputs[0].CellData['B']
> >
> > C = inputs[0].CellData['C']
> >
> > colors = numpy.empty((len(A),3), dtype='uint8')
> >
> > colors[:,0] = A*255
> >
> > colors[:,1] = B*255
> >
> > colors[:,2] = C*255
> >
> > output.CellData.append(colors, 'colors')
> >
> >
> >
> > Once you apply that script, color by the new “colors” array and uncheck
> the
> > box marked “Map Scalars” (it is an advanced option in the properties
> panel).
> >
> >
> >
> > -Ken
> >
> >
> >
> > From: ParaView [mailto:paraview-boun...@paraview.org] On Behalf Of
> Thomas
> > Oliveira
> > Sent: Saturday, May 6, 2017 7:24 AM
> > To: ParaView 
> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Paraview] Visualization ternary saturation
> >
> >
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Given three cell arrays (A,B,C) representation saturations (A+B+C = 1 for
> > every cell) is it possible to generate a ternary saturation image like
> the
> > one attached (obtained in
> > http://www.esss.com.br/Kraken/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/
> Ternary-Saturation.png)?
> >
> > In the figure, A, B, C are saturations of water, oil and gas.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Thomas Oliveira
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Powered by www.kitware.com
> >
> > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> >
> > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
> >
> > Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
> >
> > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> > http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > Powered by www.kitware.com
> >
> > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> >
> > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
> >
> > Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
> >
> > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> > http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] ParaView 5.4.0 Release Candidate 1 binaries are available for download

2017-05-09 Thread Matthieu Vitse
Hi Zach and Cory, 

I’m also on macOS 10.12.4 and everything seems to work fine for me. 

Regards, 

— 
Matt

Matthieu VITSE  | Post-doctorant 
Laboratoire de Mécanique et Technologie 
+33(0)6 24 09 12 91   |  
vi...@lmt.ens-cachan.fr  
ENS Cachan - 61 avenue du Président Wilson 94235 Cachan CEDEX 

www.ens-paris-saclay.fr 
  
> Le 9 mai 2017 à 15:22, Zach Davis  a écrit :
> 
> Hi Cory,
> 
> I’m on macOS 10.12.4.
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
>   
> Zach Davis
> Pointwise®, Inc.
> Sr. Engineer, Sales & Marketing
> 213 South Jennings Avenue
> Fort Worth, TX 76104-1107
> 
> E: zach.da...@pointwise.com 
> P: (817) 377-2807 x1202
> F: (817) 377-2799
>      
>     
>
> 
>> On May 8, 2017, at 9:31 PM, Cory Quammen > > wrote:
>> 
>> Zach,
>> 
>> Thanks for your report. However, I can't seem to reproduce that on macOS 
>> 10.11.6.
>> 
>> What version of macOS are you using? Could it be a permissions issue on your 
>> system?
>> 
>> - Cory
>> 
>> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 5:38 PM, Zach Davis > > wrote:
>> Hi Cory,
>> 
>> I’ve downloaded the latest disk image for ParaView 5.4 RC-1 for macOS; 
>> however, the image won’t open with an error message warning that there are 
>> no mountable file systems.
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>> 
>>  
>> Zach Davis
>> Pointwise®, Inc.
>> Sr. Engineer, Sales & Marketing
>> 213 South Jennings Avenue
>> Fort Worth, TX 76104-1107
>> 
>> E: zach.da...@pointwise.com 
>> P: (817) 377-2807 x1202 
>> F: (817) 377-2799 
>>      
>>    
>> 
>> 
>>> On May 8, 2017, at 10:18 AM, Cory Quammen >> > wrote:
>>> 
>>> On behalf of the ParaView development community, I am happy to
>>> announce that binaries and source code for ParaView 5.4.0-RC1 are
>>> available to download from
>>> 
>>> http://www.paraview.org/download/ 
>>> 
>>> Please let us know if you run into any problems with this release candidate.
>>> 
>>> Thank you,
>>> Cory
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Cory Quammen
>>> Staff R&D Engineer
>>> Kitware, Inc.
>>> ___
>>> Powered by www.kitware.com 
>>> 
>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
>>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView 
>>> 
>>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Cory Quammen
>> Staff R&D Engineer
>> Kitware, Inc.
> 
> ___
> Powered by www.kitware.com
> 
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> 
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
> 
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
> 
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview


Re: [Paraview] ParaView 5.4.0 Release Candidate 1 binaries are available for download

2017-05-09 Thread Zach Davis
Hi Cory,

I’m on macOS 10.12.4.

Best Regards,


Zach Davis
Pointwise®, Inc.
Sr. Engineer, Sales & Marketing
213 South Jennings Avenue
Fort Worth, TX 76104-1107

E: zach.da...@pointwise.com
P: (817) 377-2807 x1202
F: (817) 377-2799
     
  

> On May 8, 2017, at 9:31 PM, Cory Quammen  wrote:
> 
> Zach,
> 
> Thanks for your report. However, I can't seem to reproduce that on macOS 
> 10.11.6.
> 
> What version of macOS are you using? Could it be a permissions issue on your 
> system?
> 
> - Cory
> 
> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 5:38 PM, Zach Davis  > wrote:
> Hi Cory,
> 
> I’ve downloaded the latest disk image for ParaView 5.4 RC-1 for macOS; 
> however, the image won’t open with an error message warning that there are no 
> mountable file systems.
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> 
> Zach Davis
> Pointwise®, Inc.
> Sr. Engineer, Sales & Marketing
> 213 South Jennings Avenue
> Fort Worth, TX 76104-1107
> 
> E: zach.da...@pointwise.com 
> P: (817) 377-2807 x1202 
> F: (817) 377-2799 
>      
>   
> 
>> On May 8, 2017, at 10:18 AM, Cory Quammen > > wrote:
>> 
>> On behalf of the ParaView development community, I am happy to
>> announce that binaries and source code for ParaView 5.4.0-RC1 are
>> available to download from
>> 
>> http://www.paraview.org/download/ 
>> 
>> Please let us know if you run into any problems with this release candidate.
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> Cory
>> 
>> --
>> Cory Quammen
>> Staff R&D Engineer
>> Kitware, Inc.
>> ___
>> Powered by www.kitware.com 
>> 
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html 
>> 
>> 
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView 
>> 
>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView 
>> 
>> 
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Cory Quammen
> Staff R&D Engineer
> Kitware, Inc.



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview


Re: [Paraview] workstation slow render

2017-05-09 Thread Mathieu Westphal
What is the content of the "Help->About" window ?

Mathieu Westphal

On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:02 PM, andrealphus  wrote:

> Trying to make some animations on a new workstation (everything is local!)
> and things are unbelievably slow (my 8 year old mac pro runs faster with
> paraview!)
>
> System specs:
> Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2697 v4 @ 2.30GHz (18 cores)
> 128 Gb ram
> NVIDIA Corporation GM204GL [Quadro M4000]
> Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS
>
>
> I'm using the proprietary nvidia drivers. I installed from source (git),
> using;
> ccmake -DQt5_DIR=$QTLOC/Qt5.6.2/5.6/gcc_64/lib/cmake/Qt5 ./$PVLOC/ParaView
>
> enable python, turned off shared libs, and enabled mpi
>
> any thoughts? size of the model doesnt matter, just that it runs faster on
> an 8 year old machine with PV4, then it does on this workstation.
>
> Any way to make a single instance of ./bin/paraview use more than one core?
>
> Any way to check that gpu rendering is occuring correctly?
>
> these questions were all searched for online but not adequately answered.
>
>
>
> ___
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/
> opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
>
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview