Re: [Paraview] state file

[Utkarsh Ayachit]

Denis,
With 5.4.1 and newer, isn't the Load State Options dialog [1] working? You
should be able to simply select the new set of pvtu files to read by
selecting **Choose File Names** and then selecting the new file series
using the File Dialog for the appropriate reader. Is that not working as
expected?

Utkarsh

[1] https://blog.kitware.com/new-options-when-loading-paraview-state-files/

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 2:13 AM, denis cohen  wrote:

> Hi Cory,
> I am using  5.5.0-RC3 64 bit on Linux (recently downloaded)
> Do you mean that you can't open the data file or the pvsm file?
> Denis
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 6:39 AM, Cory Quammen 
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 5:36 AM, denis cohen 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>> In past versions of paraview, opening a pvsm state file that read
>>> several pvtu files resulted in paraview opening all the pvtu files in that
>>> directory. Now it only opens the ones saved in the pvsm file. This is
>>> annoying when the number of files has increased (like during a long time
>>> dependent simulation) and when wanting to use the same pvsm state file. Any
>>> ways of getting around that?
>>> Thank you
>>> Denis
>>>
>>
>> Dennis,
>>
>> What version of ParaView did this? I just tried 5.2, and could not get
>> "new" datasets to be loaded in the manner you described. Could you provide
>> more details?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Cory
>>
>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>
>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>
>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
>>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>>>
>>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>>>
>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>> https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cory Quammen
>> Staff R&D Engineer
>> Kitware, Inc.
>>
>
>
> ___
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/
> opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
>
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] state file

[Cory Quammen]

Denis,

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 2:13 AM, denis cohen  wrote:

> Hi Cory,
> I am using  5.5.0-RC3 64 bit on Linux (recently downloaded)
> Do you mean that you can't open the data file or the pvsm file?
> Denis
>

With ParaView 5.2, I can open the original files that were present when I
saved the state file (e.g. file.vtu, file0001.vtu, file0002.vtu), but
when I add additional .vtu files in the sequence (e.g., file0003.vtu,
vile0004.vtu, etc), restart ParaView, load the state file again, just those
original data files are loaded (file.vtu, file0001.vtu, file0002.vtu).
They are different file types, yes, but the behavior should be the same
regardless of file type. I get the same behavior in 5.5.0-RC3.

Do you recall in which version of ParaView the behavior you wish to see
last worked?

Thanks,
Cory


>
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 6:39 AM, Cory Quammen 
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 5:36 AM, denis cohen 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>> In past versions of paraview, opening a pvsm state file that read
>>> several pvtu files resulted in paraview opening all the pvtu files in that
>>> directory. Now it only opens the ones saved in the pvsm file. This is
>>> annoying when the number of files has increased (like during a long time
>>> dependent simulation) and when wanting to use the same pvsm state file. Any
>>> ways of getting around that?
>>> Thank you
>>> Denis
>>>
>>
>> Dennis,
>>
>> What version of ParaView did this? I just tried 5.2, and could not get
>> "new" datasets to be loaded in the manner you described. Could you provide
>> more details?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Cory
>>
>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>
>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>
>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
>>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>>>
>>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>>>
>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>> https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cory Quammen
>> Staff R&D Engineer
>> Kitware, Inc.
>>
>
>


-- 
Cory Quammen
Staff R&D Engineer
Kitware, Inc.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] state file

[Cory Quammen]

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 7:51 AM, Utkarsh Ayachit <
utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com> wrote:

> Denis,
> With 5.4.1 and newer, isn't the Load State Options dialog [1] working? You
> should be able to simply select the new set of pvtu files to read by
> selecting **Choose File Names** and then selecting the new file series
> using the File Dialog for the appropriate reader. Is that not working as
> expected?
>

I just tested locally RC3 and I get only the files listed in the state file
despite using **Choose File Names** :-( I'll write up a bug.

Cory


> Utkarsh
>
> [1] https://blog.kitware.com/new-options-when-loading-
> paraview-state-files/
>
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 2:13 AM, denis cohen 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Cory,
>> I am using  5.5.0-RC3 64 bit on Linux (recently downloaded)
>> Do you mean that you can't open the data file or the pvsm file?
>> Denis
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 6:39 AM, Cory Quammen 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 5:36 AM, denis cohen 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Hello,
 In past versions of paraview, opening a pvsm state file that read
 several pvtu files resulted in paraview opening all the pvtu files in that
 directory. Now it only opens the ones saved in the pvsm file. This is
 annoying when the number of files has increased (like during a long time
 dependent simulation) and when wanting to use the same pvsm state file. Any
 ways of getting around that?
 Thank you
 Denis

>>>
>>> Dennis,
>>>
>>> What version of ParaView did this? I just tried 5.2, and could not get
>>> "new" datasets to be loaded in the manner you described. Could you provide
>>> more details?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Cory
>>>
>>>

 ___
 Powered by www.kitware.com

 Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
 http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

 Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
 http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

 Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

 Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
 https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview


>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cory Quammen
>>> Staff R&D Engineer
>>> Kitware, Inc.
>>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>>
>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>>
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>>
>>
>


-- 
Cory Quammen
Staff R&D Engineer
Kitware, Inc.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] Conversion error

[Aron Helser]

Hi Nitisha,
It's hard to know what the problem might be without knowing what steps you
are taking to convert the files - please provide some more details.

I would guess it's a problem in the conversion software, not ParaView.

Regards,
Aron

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 5:50 PM, Nitisha Ahuja  wrote:

> Hello all,
> I am facing an issue in which, I am trying to convert post.out files from
> Converge into paraview files. For few files I get the following error
> :
>
> I am not sure whether this is the right place to ask this question, as the
> problem can be in my software too.
>
> But if anyone knows what could be the reason behind failure in conversion
> of these file, please let me know.
>
> P.S.. I see this error on some random files.
>
> Best regards
> Nitisha
>
>
> ___
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/
> opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
>
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

[Paraview] pvtu reader error

[Jamil Appa via ParaView]

Hi

I am trying to read a pvtu with Paraview 5.4.1 and getting an
unexpected behaviour.

   Using just the client the file reads as expected but when attempting to
read the same file in client server mode it reports the correct number of
cells but any subsequent operations like slice only act on the first piece
in the pvtu file.

   I can have a go at fixing the issue but need a pointer of where to start
looking.

 Thanks

 Jamil

  Example file generated by the VTK writer.

 

  

  
  


  



  



*Jamil Appa* | Co-Founder and Director | Zenotech
[image: Papercut]
[image: Tel:] +44 (0)7747 606 788 [image: Zenotech LTD - Simulation
Unlimited] 
[image: Email:] jamil.a...@zenotech.com
[image: Web:] www.zenotech.com
[image: Papercut]
[image: linkedin:] [image:
Twitter:] [image: Location:]


Company Registration No : 07926926 | VAT No : 128198591

Registered Office : 1 Larkfield Grove, Chepstow, Monmouthshire, NP16 5UF, UK

Address : Bristol & Bath Science Park, Dirac Cres, Emersons Green, Bristol
BS16 7FR
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] structured to unstructured when using multiblocks filter

[Andy Bauer]

Hi Ufuk,

If the files are small, could you send them? I'll investigate some. Also,
sending your Catalyst Python script may help clue me into what's going
wrong.

Best,
Andy

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 4:06 PM, Ufuk Turuncoglu <
u.utku.turunco...@be.itu.edu.tr> wrote:

> Thanks for your valuable comments. Yes, for each model component has two
> grid 2d and 3d and they are coming from different channels. It is working
> under 5.4.1 but i'll check the bug and try to fix my version until 5.5
> released. BTW, even if I set whole extend (to test it I hardcoded it) in
> the place that you indicate, the piece and whole extent is same in the
> files.
>
> Regards,
>
> --ufuk
>
>
> --
> *From: *"Andy Bauer" 
> *To: *"Ufuk Utku Turuncoglu (BE)" 
> *Cc: *"paraview" 
> *Sent: *Monday, March 19, 2018 3:51:51 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [Paraview] structured to unstructured when using
> multiblocks filter
>
> Hi Ufuk,
>
> It looks like you're already using multi-channel input as you're adding
> since you have " g_coprocessorData->AddInput(strarr[i]); " unless that's
> always just called once. We're just trying to clarify the "inputs" by
> naming them channels -- I'm not sure it makes it easier to understand but
> it makes it easier to talk about with others that understand that concept
> in Catalyst.
>
> Setting whole extent would look like the following at line 129 in
> adaptor.cpp:
> if (vtkDataSet* grid = vtkDataSet::SafeDownCast(g_coprocessorData->
> GetInputDescriptionByName(name)->GetGrid())) {
> ParaViewCoProcessing::ClearFieldDataFromGrid(grid);
> g_coprocessorData->GetInputDescriptionByName(name)-> SetWholeExtent(ilow,
> ihigh, jlow, jhigh, klow, khigh);
> } else {
>
> Here, *low and *high are global values. For example, for a 1D case if each
> process has 5 points and you have 3 mpi processes
> ilow=jlow=jhigh=klow=khigh=0 and ihigh=12. The
> vtkStructuredGrid::SetExtent() would look like:
> proc 0: 0, 4, 0, 0, 0, 0
> proc 1: 4, 8, 0, 0, 0, 0
> proc 2: 8, 12, 0, 0, 0, 0
>
> This looks like you're doing it properly in grid.cpp though but I didn't
> set the SetWholeExtent() in adaptor.cpp and I'm guessing that's what's
> missing.
>
> The multi-channel input should work in 5.4.1 but I found a bug that's been
> fixed in the upcoming 5.5 that was affecting Live. See
> https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/merge_requests/2212 for
> details on that. It's fairly small so you can probably backport that to
> your 5.4.1 build if you're more comfortable using 5.4.1.
>
> Cheers,
> Andy
>
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 7:50 AM, Ufuk Utku Turuncoglu (BE) <
> u.utku.turunco...@be.itu.edu.tr> wrote:
>
>> Hi Andy,
>>
>> Thanks for your help. Yes, each tile has its own grid information. The
>> problem is that if i set whole extent in the adaptor side and write data to
>> disk using allinputsgridwrite.py, the whole extent is same with piece
>> extent. I am not sure what is going on in the background when live
>> visualization activated. If you want to look at it for possible problem,
>> the code is in following link (adaptor.cpp and grid.cpp),
>>
>> https://github.com/uturuncoglu/RegESM/tree/master/cop
>>
>> The second option is also worth to try but first i need to look at the
>> example. BTW, i am using 5.4.1. Do you think that the multi-channel input
>> also works with 5.4.1? How it is handled by Catalyst in live mode? Do i
>> have multiple visualization pipeline?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> --ufuk
>>
>>
>> On 19.03.2018 13:36, Andy Bauer wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ufuk,
>>
>> Currently a multipiece data set always has to be nested under a
>> multiblock dataset. This definitely seems like an unreasonable limitation
>> on a structured grid under a multipiece dataset but I suspect we just
>> haven't had the resources to put into making this work properly. My
>> suggestion would be to try just having your Catalyst adaptor provide a
>> structured grid directly, assuming you only have one grid per mpi process,
>> and then try volume rendering like that. If you do this though, make sure
>> to set the whole extent with vtkCPInputDataDescription::SetWholeExtent().
>>
>>
>> A thought here -- instead of changing your adaptor to generate the
>> structured grid directly instead of a multipiece dataset, maybe create a
>> second "channel" through a second vtkCPInputDataDescription that provides
>> just a structured grid. This way you can provide both dataset types as
>> needed instead of having to modify code back and forth, recompile, etc. to
>> get different functionality. See the 
>> Examples/Catalyst/CxxMultiChannelInputExample
>> in the 5.5 source code for some more details on this.
>>
>> I can't remember if you were using the editions or just the full ParaView
>> Catalyst build but in 5.5 there will be a volume rendering Catalyst
>> addition.
>>
>> Note that the multiblock/multipiece hierarchy will be undergoing a
>> significant change in the near future.
>>
>> Best,
>> Andy
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 1:21 PM, Ufuk Turuncoglu <

Re: [Paraview] [EXTERNAL] Re: ParaView 5.5.0-RC2 tagged, binaries available

[Cory Quammen]

Simon,

Thanks for the report. As a workaround, you can go to Edit > Settings...
and under the render tab, click the gear to access the "Depth Peeling for
Volumes" option. Turn this off and you should no longer get the warning.

Utkarsh,

This warning is a useful message, but it will appear all the time for
Simon. Shall we filter the message out of the output messages?

Thanks,
Cory

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Michalke, Simon 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I get the following warning when trying to open the .vtu file:
>
> Warning: In /home/simon/code/cfs_paraview/metabuild/build/superbuild/par
> aview/src/VTK/Rendering/OpenGL2/vtkOpenGLRenderer.cxx, line 379
> vtkOpenGLRenderer (0x46b0440): UseDepthPeelingForVolumes requested, but
> unsupported since DualDepthPeeling is not available.
>
> otherwise it is working.
>
> Simon
>
>
> Am 2018-03-20 14:05, schrieb Fabian Wein:
>
>> On 03/19/18 18:02, Scott, W Alan wrote:
>>
>>> Hmmm...  No, another configuration file isn't necessary.
>>>
>>> Could you give us the dataset (if it is small) and a File/ Save State
>>> file?  I tried replicating this with Wavelet, and everything looks fine...
>>> Ditto a slice of disk_out_ref.  I'm wondering if it has to do with the
>>> dataset type or the extents (bounds, on the information tab).
>>>
>>
>> I just checked with 5.5-RC3 and the error persists on my machine.
>>
>> Fabian
>>
>


-- 
Cory Quammen
Staff R&D Engineer
Kitware, Inc.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] state file

[denis cohen]

Hi Cory, Utkarsh,
Thanks for checking all this. All options I tried in the dialog did not
work.
I can't remember exactly when it last worked (and it did) but I think
things no longer worked with version 5 of paraview, so a while back.
Unfortunately I've reinstalled all my computers so lost all earlier
versions of Paraview.
Denis

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 2:00 PM, Cory Quammen 
wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 7:51 AM, Utkarsh Ayachit <
> utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com> wrote:
>
>> Denis,
>> With 5.4.1 and newer, isn't the Load State Options dialog [1] working?
>> You should be able to simply select the new set of pvtu files to read by
>> selecting **Choose File Names** and then selecting the new file series
>> using the File Dialog for the appropriate reader. Is that not working as
>> expected?
>>
>
> I just tested locally RC3 and I get only the files listed in the state
> file despite using **Choose File Names** :-( I'll write up a bug.
>
> Cory
>
>
>> Utkarsh
>>
>> [1] https://blog.kitware.com/new-options-when-loading-paravi
>> ew-state-files/
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 2:13 AM, denis cohen 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Cory,
>>> I am using  5.5.0-RC3 64 bit on Linux (recently downloaded)
>>> Do you mean that you can't open the data file or the pvsm file?
>>> Denis
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 6:39 AM, Cory Quammen 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 5:36 AM, denis cohen 
 wrote:

> Hello,
> In past versions of paraview, opening a pvsm state file that read
> several pvtu files resulted in paraview opening all the pvtu files in that
> directory. Now it only opens the ones saved in the pvsm file. This is
> annoying when the number of files has increased (like during a long time
> dependent simulation) and when wanting to use the same pvsm state file. 
> Any
> ways of getting around that?
> Thank you
> Denis
>

 Dennis,

 What version of ParaView did this? I just tried 5.2, and could not get
 "new" datasets to be loaded in the manner you described. Could you provide
 more details?

 Thanks,
 Cory


>
> ___
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
>


 --
 Cory Quammen
 Staff R&D Engineer
 Kitware, Inc.

>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>>
>>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>>
>>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
>>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>>>
>>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>>>
>>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>>> https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cory Quammen
> Staff R&D Engineer
> Kitware, Inc.
>
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] state file

[Cory Quammen]

Denis,

No problem. I'll work on a fix, hopefully for 5.5.0 final.

Thanks,
Cory

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:42 AM, denis cohen  wrote:

> Hi Cory, Utkarsh,
> Thanks for checking all this. All options I tried in the dialog did not
> work.
> I can't remember exactly when it last worked (and it did) but I think
> things no longer worked with version 5 of paraview, so a while back.
> Unfortunately I've reinstalled all my computers so lost all earlier
> versions of Paraview.
> Denis
>
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 2:00 PM, Cory Quammen 
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 7:51 AM, Utkarsh Ayachit <
>> utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Denis,
>>> With 5.4.1 and newer, isn't the Load State Options dialog [1] working?
>>> You should be able to simply select the new set of pvtu files to read by
>>> selecting **Choose File Names** and then selecting the new file series
>>> using the File Dialog for the appropriate reader. Is that not working as
>>> expected?
>>>
>>
>> I just tested locally RC3 and I get only the files listed in the state
>> file despite using **Choose File Names** :-( I'll write up a bug.
>>
>> Cory
>>
>>
>>> Utkarsh
>>>
>>> [1] https://blog.kitware.com/new-options-when-loading-paravi
>>> ew-state-files/
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 2:13 AM, denis cohen 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Hi Cory,
 I am using  5.5.0-RC3 64 bit on Linux (recently downloaded)
 Do you mean that you can't open the data file or the pvsm file?
 Denis


 On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 6:39 AM, Cory Quammen >>> > wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 5:36 AM, denis cohen 
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> In past versions of paraview, opening a pvsm state file that read
>> several pvtu files resulted in paraview opening all the pvtu files in 
>> that
>> directory. Now it only opens the ones saved in the pvsm file. This is
>> annoying when the number of files has increased (like during a long time
>> dependent simulation) and when wanting to use the same pvsm state file. 
>> Any
>> ways of getting around that?
>> Thank you
>> Denis
>>
>
> Dennis,
>
> What version of ParaView did this? I just tried 5.2, and could not get
> "new" datasets to be loaded in the manner you described. Could you provide
> more details?
>
> Thanks,
> Cory
>
>
>>
>> ___
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>>
>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>>
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cory Quammen
> Staff R&D Engineer
> Kitware, Inc.
>


 ___
 Powered by www.kitware.com

 Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
 http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

 Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
 http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

 Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

 Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
 https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview


>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cory Quammen
>> Staff R&D Engineer
>> Kitware, Inc.
>>
>
>


-- 
Cory Quammen
Staff R&D Engineer
Kitware, Inc.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] Fwd: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: ParaView 5.5.0-RC2 tagged, binaries available

[Cory Quammen]

> Switching Depth Peeling off enables Axes grid for me! I don't even need a
> dataset to check. Note, that I did not get a warning.
>
> @ Fabian Thanks for the additional clue.

@Allison - it looks like there is an interaction on some systems with the
axes grid label rendering and depth peeling. Is that something you can help
track down?

Thanks,
Cory


> Fabian
>
>
>
>
>> Thanks,
>> Cory
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Michalke, Simon > > wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I get the following warning when trying to open the .vtu file:
>>
>> Warning: In /home/simon/code/cfs_paraview/
>> metabuild/build/superbuild/paraview/src/VTK/Rendering/OpenGL2/vtkOpenGLRenderer.cxx,
>> line 379
>> vtkOpenGLRenderer (0x46b0440): UseDepthPeelingForVolumes requested,
>> but unsupported since DualDepthPeeling is not available.
>>
>> otherwise it is working.
>>
>> Simon
>>
>>
>> Am 2018-03-20 14:05, schrieb Fabian Wein:
>>
>> On 03/19/18 18:02, Scott, W Alan wrote:
>>
>> Hmmm...  No, another configuration file isn't necessary.
>>
>> Could you give us the dataset (if it is small) and a File/
>> Save State file?  I tried replicating this with Wavelet, and everything
>> looks fine...  Ditto a slice of disk_out_ref.  I'm wondering if it has to
>> do with the dataset type or the extents (bounds, on the information tab).
>>
>>
>> I just checked with 5.5-RC3 and the error persists on my machine.
>>
>> Fabian
>>
>>
>>
>
> ___
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/
> opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
>


-- 
Cory Quammen
Staff R&D Engineer
Kitware, Inc.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] unknown properties returned by ListProperties?

[Grothausmann, Roman Dr.]

Many thanks Cory for your feedback. Not adding empty (None) properties did not 
help 
(http://github.com/romangrothausmann/ParaView_scripts/commit/d3af645dd1af2a). 
Anyway, "ForceUseCache" has a vector of value 0 so it seems to me the actual 
problem still is that ListProperties() returns properties that are not part of 
the specific object that is calling ListProperties(). E.g. help(repr) does not 
list a property called "ForceUseCache" but e.g. "Visibility"


So I decided to only restore the property "Visibility" for a start:
http://github.com/romangrothausmann/ParaView_scripts/commit/d1c63f2682e834e
Even though there is no error on execution any more, the resulting PVSM has only 
the visibilities set for the last loaded PVSM, i.e. the setting of the 
"Visibility" of representations loaded from former PVSMs did not have any effect.
Is there a need to call some kind of Update() to make the property setting have 
any effect? I tried some rendering 
(http://github.com/romangrothausmann/ParaView_scripts/commit/294ff85a0cc7a), but 
that did not help either.



On 20/03/18 06:12, Cory Quammen wrote:

Roman,

Looking at your original problem with the error:


    File 
"/opt/paraview-5.3.0_GL1/lib/paraview-5.3/site-packages/paraview/servermanager.py", 
line 375, in SetPropertyWithName

  prop.SetData(arg)
    File 
"/opt/paraview-5.3.0_GL1/lib/paraview-5.3/site-packages/paraview/servermanager.py", 
line 1296, in SetData

  self.SMProperty.AddProxy(value_proxy)
TypeError: AddProxy argument 1: method requires a VTK object


You are hitting this when attempting to set the DataAxesGrid, which is a 
ProxyProperty. In your dictionary, this entry has value 'None', but it looks 
like setting a property to value 'None' is not handled correctly in 
servermanager.py. As a workaround, I suggest filtering out properties from your 
dictionary that have 'None' as a value, i.e., do not add those property values 
to your dictionary.


HTH,
Cory

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 12:12 PM, Grothausmann, Roman Dr. 
mailto:grothausmann.ro...@mh-hannover.de>> 
wrote:


Hi Cory,


Trying to find out what causes the former problems, I inserted a line that
just sets the property that got collected so far:

https://github.com/romangrothausmann/ParaView_scripts/commit/b8058f774535398da3767048219df12d6354e6c5#diff-2804420278bfff084788b82c715c452eR59


It already aborts on the first property encountered (ForceUseCache):


ForceUseCache 0
Traceback (most recent call last):
   File "/net/home/paraview/scripts/pvsm-multi.py", line 91, in 
     main()
   File "/net/home/paraview/scripts/pvsm-multi.py", line 59, in main
     pvs.SetProperties(repr, **d)
   File
"/opt/paraview-5.3.0_GL1/lib/paraview-5.3/site-packages/paraview/simple.py",
line 567, in SetProperties
     raise AttributeError("object has no property %s" % param)
AttributeError: object has no property ForceUseCache

Is ListProperties() returning properties that are not part of the specific
object that is calling ListProperties()?

Many thanks for any help or hints,
Roman

On 21/12/17 16:06, Grothausmann, Roman Dr. wrote:

Hi Cory,

On 06/12/17 23:06, Cory Quammen wrote:

Sorry I failed to follow up. Did you find a solution to this 
problem?


Many thanks for your reply. No, and I'm still stuck. I tried Your
suggestion to remove [0]

(https://github.com/romangrothausmann/ParaView_scripts/commit/e40d1016d698ee363500bb9bf04f29add89b99dd

),
which changed the reported error from:

    File

"/opt/paraview-5.3.0_GL1/lib/paraview-5.3/site-packages/paraview/servermanager.py",
line 375, in SetPropertyWithName
  prop.SetData(arg)
    File

"/opt/paraview-5.3.0_GL1/lib/paraview-5.3/site-packages/paraview/servermanager.py",
line 803, in SetData
  raise RuntimeError("This property requires %d values." %
self.GetNumberOfElements())
RuntimeError: This property requires 3 values.

to:

    File

"/opt/paraview-5.3.0_GL1/lib/paraview-5.3/site-packages/paraview/servermanager.py",
line 375, in SetPropertyWithName
  prop.SetData(arg)
    File

"/opt/paraview-5.3.0_GL1/lib/paraview-5.3/site-packages/paraview/servermanager.py",
line 1296, in SetData
  self.SMProperty.AddProxy(value_proxy)
TypeError: AddProxy argument 1: method requires a VTK object

Any ideas on this?
Would You say it is a general problem in the py-code or could it be
caused by the content of the PVSMs I'm trying to combine?

Many tha

Re: [Paraview] Conversion error

[Nitisha Ahuja]

Thanks a lot Aaron,
 I saw that, these files are also not getting converted into Ensight
format, as well.

Best regards
Nitisha


On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 9:29 AM, Aron Helser 
wrote:

> Hi Nitisha,
> It's hard to know what the problem might be without knowing what steps you
> are taking to convert the files - please provide some more details.
>
> I would guess it's a problem in the conversion software, not ParaView.
>
> Regards,
> Aron
>
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 5:50 PM, Nitisha Ahuja  wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>> I am facing an issue in which, I am trying to convert post.out files from
>> Converge into paraview files. For few files I get the following error
>> :
>>
>> I am not sure whether this is the right place to ask this question, as
>> the problem can be in my software too.
>>
>> But if anyone knows what could be the reason behind failure in conversion
>> of these file, please let me know.
>>
>> P.S.. I see this error on some random files.
>>
>> Best regards
>> Nitisha
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
>> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>>
>> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>>
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>>
>>
>
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] [EXTERNAL] Re: ParaView 5.5.0-RC2 tagged, binaries available

[Utkarsh Ayachit]

> Utkarsh,
>
> This warning is a useful message, but it will appear all the time for Simon.
> Shall we filter the message out of the output messages?

Ideally, the renderer only puts that message out once in its lifetime.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

[Paraview] Help :Texture coordinates

[GeorgeP S]

Hello all,

i wanted to know if there is a way to apply a texture on cells that do not
have texture coordinates. If so how can i do it?

Thank you,
George


Mail
priva di virus. www.avast.com

<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] vtkTable display

[Manochehr Bahavar]

I also noticed that I am receiving these generic warnings when I open the 
SpreadSheetView! Although they are warning, could they play any role?

Thanks,

—manoch

Generic Warning: In 
/Users/kitware/dashboards/buildbot-slave/8275bd07/source-paraview/ParaViewCore/ServerManager/Core/vtkSMPropertyHelper.cxx,
 line 511
Failed to locate property: OSPRayMaterialLibrary

Generic Warning: In 
/Users/kitware/dashboards/buildbot-slave/8275bd07/source-paraview/ParaViewCore/ServerManager/Core/vtkSMPropertyHelper.cxx,
 line 831
Call not supported for the current property type.

> On Mar 20, 2018, at 4:57 AM, Utkarsh Ayachit  
> wrote:
> 
> By "table panel" do you mean spreadsheet view or something else? With 5.5, I 
> don't notice anything odd because of long names. The Spreadsheet view can 
> shrink to a smaller size, as needed.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 1:02 PM, Manochehr Bahavar 
> mailto:man...@iris.washington.edu>> wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I am creating a Python programmable filter and I need to provide user some 
> additional information. I have been using RenameSource to pass the needed 
> information to user using pipeline object names. The rather long pipeline 
> object names have not been causing an issue. However, I just tried to display 
> a vtkTable and realized that because of the long names, the drop-down in the 
> table panel takes too much horizontal space and causes the table panel to be 
> too wide! Is there a better way of displaying the information or is there any 
> way I can force the table panel to open under my display table and not next 
> to it.
> 
> I will appreciate any help
> 
> Best,
> 
> —manoch
> 
> ___
> Powered by www.kitware.com 
> 
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html 
> 
> 
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView 
> 
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView 
> 
> 
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview 
> 
> 
> 

___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] structured to unstructured when using multiblocks filter

[Ufuk Turuncoglu]

Hi Andy, 

You could find example dataset in the following link, 

[ https://kovan.itu.edu.tr/index.php/s/6RKZuW5rXGS57dR | 
https://kovan.itu.edu.tr/index.php/s/6RKZuW5rXGS57dR ] 

to work with IndeX volume rendering plugin, i add three grid point ghost region 
to the tiles in this case but it demonstrated whole extent problem. To write 
data I am using standard allinputsgrid.py and for volume rendering i am using 
attached co-processing script (this version creates a band around tiles when I 
use with standard volume rendering methods of ParaView, i think it is related 
with three grid ghost point). 

Regards, 

--ufuk 

On 20.03.2018 17:10, Andy Bauer wrote: 



Hi Ufuk, 

If the files are small, could you send them? I'll investigate some. Also, 
sending your Catalyst Python script may help clue me into what's going wrong. 

Best, 
Andy 

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 4:06 PM, Ufuk Turuncoglu < [ 
mailto:u.utku.turunco...@be.itu.edu.tr | u.utku.turunco...@be.itu.edu.tr ] > 
wrote: 

BQ_BEGIN

Thanks for your valuable comments. Yes, for each model component has two grid 
2d and 3d and they are coming from different channels. It is working under 
5.4.1 but i'll check the bug and try to fix my version until 5.5 released. BTW, 
even if I set whole extend (to test it I hardcoded it) in the place that you 
indicate, the piece and whole extent is same in the files. 

Regards, 

--ufuk 



From: "Andy Bauer" < [ mailto:andy.ba...@kitware.com | andy.ba...@kitware.com ] 
> 
To: "Ufuk Utku Turuncoglu (BE)" < [ mailto:u.utku.turunco...@be.itu.edu.tr | 
u.utku.turunco...@be.itu.edu.tr ] > 
Cc: "paraview" < [ mailto:parav...@paraview.org | parav...@paraview.org ] > 
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2018 3:51:51 PM 
Subject: Re: [Paraview] structured to unstructured when using multiblocks 
filter 

Hi Ufuk, 

It looks like you're already using multi-channel input as you're adding since 
you have " g_coprocessorData-> AddInput (strarr[i]); " unless that's always 
just called once. We're just trying to clarify the "inputs" by naming them 
channels -- I'm not sure it makes it easier to understand but it makes it 
easier to talk about with others that understand that concept in Catalyst. 

Setting whole extent would look like the following at line 129 in adaptor.cpp: 

if (vtkDataSet* grid = vtkDataSet::SafeDownCast (g_coprocessorData-> 
GetInputDescriptionByName (name)-> GetGrid ())) { 

ParaViewCoProcessing::ClearFieldDataFromGrid (grid); 
g_coprocessorData-> GetInputDescriptionByName (name)-> SetWholeExtent(ilow, 
ihigh, jlow, jhigh, klow, khigh); 


} else { 

Here, *low and *high are global values. For example, for a 1D case if each 
process has 5 points and you have 3 mpi processes ilow=jlow=jhigh=klow=khigh=0 
and ihigh=12. The vtkStructuredGrid::SetExtent() would look like: 
proc 0: 0, 4, 0, 0, 0, 0 
proc 1: 4, 8, 0, 0, 0, 0 
proc 2: 8, 12, 0, 0, 0, 0 

This looks like you're doing it properly in grid.cpp though but I didn't set 
the SetWholeExtent() in adaptor.cpp and I'm guessing that's what's missing. 

The multi-channel input should work in 5.4.1 but I found a bug that's been 
fixed in the upcoming 5.5 that was affecting Live. See [ 
https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/merge_requests/2212 | 
https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/merge_requests/2212 ] for details 
on that. It's fairly small so you can probably backport that to your 5.4.1 
build if you're more comfortable using 5.4.1. 

Cheers, 
Andy 

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 7:50 AM, Ufuk Utku Turuncoglu (BE) < [ 
mailto:u.utku.turunco...@be.itu.edu.tr | u.utku.turunco...@be.itu.edu.tr ] > 
wrote: 

BQ_BEGIN

Hi Andy, 

Thanks for your help. Yes, each tile has its own grid information. The problem 
is that if i set whole extent in the adaptor side and write data to disk using 
allinputsgridwrite.py, the whole extent is same with piece extent. I am not 
sure what is going on in the background when live visualization activated. If 
you want to look at it for possible problem, the code is in following link 
(adaptor.cpp and grid.cpp), 

[ https://github.com/uturuncoglu/RegESM/tree/master/cop | 
https://github.com/uturuncoglu/RegESM/tree/master/cop ] 

The second option is also worth to try but first i need to look at the example. 
BTW, i am using 5.4.1. Do you think that the multi-channel input also works 
with 5.4.1? How it is handled by Catalyst in live mode? Do i have multiple 
visualization pipeline? 

Regards, 

--ufuk 


On 19.03.2018 13:36, Andy Bauer wrote: 

BQ_BEGIN

Hi Ufuk, 

Currently a multipiece data set always has to be nested under a multiblock 
dataset. This definitely seems like an unreasonable limitation on a structured 
grid under a multipiece dataset but I suspect we just haven't had the resources 
to put into making this work properly. My suggestion would be to try just 
having your Catalyst adaptor provide a structured grid directly, assuming you 
only have one grid per mpi process, and then try volume rendering lik

Re: [Paraview] Help :Texture coordinates

[David E DeMarle]

The three Filters->Texture Map To ... filters programmatically create
simple texture coordinates based on simple functions of the geometry.

David E DeMarle
Kitware, Inc.
Principal Engineer
21 Corporate Drive
Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662
Phone: 518-881-4909 <(518)%20881-4909>

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 1:58 PM, GeorgeP S  wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> i wanted to know if there is a way to apply a texture on cells that do not
> have texture coordinates. If so how can i do it?
>
> Thank you,
> George
>
>
> 
>  Mail
> priva di virus. www.avast.com
> 
> <#m_-7146931150643625814_m_-4213450803092441443_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>
> ___
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensou
> rce/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>
>
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

[Paraview] Visualization of parcels in paraview without surface

[Nitisha Ahuja]

Hello all,
I am trying to visualize a spray simulation in paraview. The problem that I
am facing is as soon as I make the surface completely transparent to look
at the spray parcels, spray parcels also disappear, as shown below.

How can I visualize these parcels without surface showing in Paraview

Best regards
Nitisha
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] vtkTable display

[Utkarsh Ayachit]

Manoch,

Thanks! I can reproduce it now as well. Mind reporting it as a bug on
the issue tracker? I don't there's any fix for this that doesn't
involve fixing the code.

Utkarsh
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] vtkTable display

[Manochehr Bahavar]

Utkarsh, 

Sure, I will do that right now.

Thanks,

—manoch


> On Mar 20, 2018, at 2:12 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit  
> wrote:
> 
> Manoch,
> 
> Thanks! I can reproduce it now as well. Mind reporting it as a bug on
> the issue tracker? I don't there's any fix for this that doesn't
> involve fixing the code.
> 
> Utkarsh

___
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview