Re: [Paraview] paraviewweb, linked views, mouse handler

[Sebastien Jourdain]

We missed 5.5.2, but it will be in 5.6.x which should be out in less than 3
months.

On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 10:05 AM Sgouros, Thomas 
wrote:

> Forgot to ask: When do you think that will make it into the codebase?
>
> Thanks,
>
>  -Tom
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:04 PM, Sgouros, Thomas <
> thomas_sgou...@brown.edu> wrote:
>
>> Got it. I had misunderstood that message to only refer to the PVW
>> changes. I found the protocol.py file and made the change and it seems to
>> work fine now.
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>>  -Tom
>>
>>
>> For those who are interested, it involves changing the
>>
>> /Applications/ParaView-5.5.2.app/Contents/Python/paraview/web/protocols.py
>> file like this, around line 605:
>>
>>
>> if not realViewId in self.trackingViews:
>> observerCallback = lambda *args, **kwargs:
>> self.pushRender(realViewId)
>> -startCallback = lambda *args, **kwargs:
>> self.startViewAnimation()
>> -stopCallback = lambda *args, **kwargs:
>> self.stopViewAnimation()
>> +startCallback = lambda *args, **kwargs:
>> self.startViewAnimation(realViewId)
>> +stopCallback = lambda *args, **kwargs:
>> self.stopViewAnimation(realViewId)
>> tag = self.getApplication().AddObserver('UpdateEvent',
>> observerCallback)
>> tagStart =
>> self.getApplication().AddObserver('StartInteractionEvent', startCallback)
>> tagStop =
>> self.getApplication().AddObserver('EndInteractionEvent', stopCallback)
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Sebastien Jourdain <
>> sebastien.jourd...@kitware.com> wrote:
>>
>>> So ParaView 5.5.2 still don't have the correct code base, but
>>> ParaView/master works exactly as expected...
>>>
>>> If you look back at our previous email thread, I must have highlighted
>>> to you what was the change I had to do on the server side, which you can
>>> easily pick since it is just Python code with your current ParaView version.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 9:11 PM Sgouros, Thomas <
>>> thomas_sgou...@brown.edu> wrote:
>>>
 Hi Sebastien:

 Actually no, that doesn't change this behavior. One view moves with the
 cursor when I click on it, while the other only moves when the mouse button
 is lifted. This is true on your example, as well as my code, and I seem
 unable to control which one is which. Are you saying your example works
 differently for you?

 Thanks,

  -Tom

 On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 8:53 PM, Sgouros, Thomas <
 thomas_sgou...@brown.edu> wrote:

> Ok, thanks. I'll give that a try.
>
>  -Tom
>
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 5:44 PM, Sebastien Jourdain <
> sebastien.jourd...@kitware.com> wrote:
>
>> You need ParaView 5.5.2 or master as I said last time, I fixed some
>> stuff on the python side to properly register animation on a given view.
>> Or you may have patched your ParaView. But for sure, you need Python
>> code along with the pvw change I made.
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 1:12 PM Sgouros, Thomas <
>> thomas_sgou...@brown.edu> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 10:43 AM, Sebastien Jourdain <
>>> sebastien.jourd...@kitware.com> wrote:
>>>
 Hi Tom,

 - The mouse handler seems to listen only to one view...

 I though the example in
 https://github.com/Kitware/paraviewweb-examples was taking care of
 that. Or maybe I don't understand what you mean here.

>>>
>>> I'm not really sure if it is or it isn't. It may be an illusion
>>> created by the other problem, but I don't know how to tell for sure 
>>> which
>>> view is listening.
>>>
>>>
>>>
 - The behavior I observe is that one of the views moves...

 That could be possible but are you using the latest
 ParaView/master? Normally any registered view should receive a stream 
 of
 images. With the fix I've done last time for the multi-view.


>>> The example you wrote behaves this way for me, too, even when I link
>>> the views (see patch attached). One moves with the cursor and the other
>>> only moves when you lift up the mouse button. Change the sphere to
>>> something you can see move better and you'll see. I'm using the 
>>> ParaViewWeb
>>> 3.2.2 that you made. Or are you talking about Paraview itself? That's at
>>> 5.5.0rc3. Were there relevant changes since then?
>>>
>>>
>>>
 - When I make one of the views invisible...

 Do you still have a css / size issue when you make it available
 again? You need to inspect the DOM to see where that component is 
 present
 (area of active).
 Then does interacting on that area is not enough to get the images,
 or interacting does not work because the "active" area has a size
 0x0?

[Paraview] IEEE Supercomputing 2018 - Kitware wants to promote your work!

[David E DeMarle]

Greetings VTK and ParaView communities,

We at Kitware are searching for compelling images, videos, and entire
applications enabled by VTK and ParaView to show in our booth at this year's
 Supercomputing conference . For a sample
of what we demonstrated before, check out last year's highlights
. In conjunction with SC18, and again with
your permission, we would also like to reference your work from the
galleries and success stories on paraview.org or vtk.org.

So, if you've got a cool app, or have recently used VTK and ParaView to
make some great looking visualizations, are able to share them, and want us
to show them off for you, please contact me so we can discuss the details.
Videos should ideally be 1920x1080 pixels for HD display, and still
visualizations should be 150ppi when scaled to 100%. For the attribution,
we will need at a minimum your name, a title or brief caption, and the
acknowledgement as you would like it to appear.

Finally, if you happen to be going to the conference and would like a forum
to present your work at, please let me know so we can schedule your
presentation in our booth.

thanks, and I hope to see many of you at SuperComputing in November!

David E DeMarle
Kitware, Inc.
Principal Engineer
21 Corporate Drive
Clifton Park, NY 12065-8662
Phone: 518-881-4909
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

ParaView discussion is moving! Please visit https://discourse.paraview.org/ for 
future posts.

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Re: [Paraview] paraviewweb, linked views, mouse handler

[Sgouros, Thomas]

Forgot to ask: When do you think that will make it into the codebase?

Thanks,

 -Tom

On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 12:04 PM, Sgouros, Thomas 
wrote:

> Got it. I had misunderstood that message to only refer to the PVW changes.
> I found the protocol.py file and made the change and it seems to work fine
> now.
>
> Thank you,
>
>  -Tom
>
>
> For those who are interested, it involves changing the
>
> /Applications/ParaView-5.5.2.app/Contents/Python/paraview/web/protocols.py
> file like this, around line 605:
>
>
> if not realViewId in self.trackingViews:
> observerCallback = lambda *args, **kwargs:
> self.pushRender(realViewId)
> -startCallback = lambda *args, **kwargs:
> self.startViewAnimation()
> -stopCallback = lambda *args, **kwargs:
> self.stopViewAnimation()
> +startCallback = lambda *args, **kwargs:
> self.startViewAnimation(realViewId)
> +stopCallback = lambda *args, **kwargs: self.stopViewAnimation(
> realViewId)
> tag = self.getApplication().AddObserver('UpdateEvent',
> observerCallback)
> tagStart = 
> self.getApplication().AddObserver('StartInteractionEvent',
> startCallback)
> tagStop = self.getApplication().AddObserver('EndInteractionEvent',
> stopCallback)
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Sebastien Jourdain <
> sebastien.jourd...@kitware.com> wrote:
>
>> So ParaView 5.5.2 still don't have the correct code base, but
>> ParaView/master works exactly as expected...
>>
>> If you look back at our previous email thread, I must have highlighted
>> to you what was the change I had to do on the server side, which you can
>> easily pick since it is just Python code with your current ParaView version.
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 9:11 PM Sgouros, Thomas 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Sebastien:
>>>
>>> Actually no, that doesn't change this behavior. One view moves with the
>>> cursor when I click on it, while the other only moves when the mouse button
>>> is lifted. This is true on your example, as well as my code, and I seem
>>> unable to control which one is which. Are you saying your example works
>>> differently for you?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>  -Tom
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 8:53 PM, Sgouros, Thomas <
>>> thomas_sgou...@brown.edu> wrote:
>>>
 Ok, thanks. I'll give that a try.

  -Tom

 On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 5:44 PM, Sebastien Jourdain <
 sebastien.jourd...@kitware.com> wrote:

> You need ParaView 5.5.2 or master as I said last time, I fixed some
> stuff on the python side to properly register animation on a given view.
> Or you may have patched your ParaView. But for sure, you need Python
> code along with the pvw change I made.
>
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 1:12 PM Sgouros, Thomas <
> thomas_sgou...@brown.edu> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 10:43 AM, Sebastien Jourdain <
>> sebastien.jourd...@kitware.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Tom,
>>>
>>> - The mouse handler seems to listen only to one view...
>>>
>>> I though the example in https://github.com/Kitware/
>>> paraviewweb-examples was taking care of that. Or maybe I don't
>>> understand what you mean here.
>>>
>>
>> I'm not really sure if it is or it isn't. It may be an illusion
>> created by the other problem, but I don't know how to tell for sure which
>> view is listening.
>>
>>
>>
>>> - The behavior I observe is that one of the views moves...
>>>
>>> That could be possible but are you using the latest ParaView/master?
>>> Normally any registered view should receive a stream of images. With the
>>> fix I've done last time for the multi-view.
>>>
>>>
>> The example you wrote behaves this way for me, too, even when I link
>> the views (see patch attached). One moves with the cursor and the other
>> only moves when you lift up the mouse button. Change the sphere to
>> something you can see move better and you'll see. I'm using the 
>> ParaViewWeb
>> 3.2.2 that you made. Or are you talking about Paraview itself? That's at
>> 5.5.0rc3. Were there relevant changes since then?
>>
>>
>>
>>> - When I make one of the views invisible...
>>>
>>> Do you still have a css / size issue when you make it available
>>> again? You need to inspect the DOM to see where that component is 
>>> present
>>> (area of active).
>>> Then does interacting on that area is not enough to get the images, or
>>> interacting does not work because the "active" area has a size 0x0?
>>>
>>>
>> I did fix the css / size issue that was pestering me last week. Your
>> explanation has the air of plausibility, but I don't completely 
>> understand
>> how this would work. Can you suggest how I would find the size of the
>> active area?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>  -Tom
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 

Re: [Paraview] paraviewweb, linked views, mouse handler

[Sgouros, Thomas]

Got it. I had misunderstood that message to only refer to the PVW changes.
I found the protocol.py file and made the change and it seems to work fine
now.

Thank you,

 -Tom


For those who are interested, it involves changing the

/Applications/ParaView-5.5.2.app/Contents/Python/paraview/web/protocols.py
file like this, around line 605:


if not realViewId in self.trackingViews:
observerCallback = lambda *args, **kwargs:
self.pushRender(realViewId)
-startCallback = lambda *args, **kwargs:
self.startViewAnimation()
-stopCallback = lambda *args, **kwargs: self.stopViewAnimation()
+startCallback = lambda *args, **kwargs:
self.startViewAnimation(realViewId)
+stopCallback = lambda *args, **kwargs:
self.stopViewAnimation(realViewId)
tag = self.getApplication().AddObserver('UpdateEvent',
observerCallback)
tagStart =
self.getApplication().AddObserver('StartInteractionEvent', startCallback)
tagStop =
self.getApplication().AddObserver('EndInteractionEvent', stopCallback)


On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Sebastien Jourdain <
sebastien.jourd...@kitware.com> wrote:

> So ParaView 5.5.2 still don't have the correct code base, but
> ParaView/master works exactly as expected...
>
> If you look back at our previous email thread, I must have highlighted  to
> you what was the change I had to do on the server side, which you can
> easily pick since it is just Python code with your current ParaView version.
>
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 9:11 PM Sgouros, Thomas 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Sebastien:
>>
>> Actually no, that doesn't change this behavior. One view moves with the
>> cursor when I click on it, while the other only moves when the mouse button
>> is lifted. This is true on your example, as well as my code, and I seem
>> unable to control which one is which. Are you saying your example works
>> differently for you?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>  -Tom
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 8:53 PM, Sgouros, Thomas <
>> thomas_sgou...@brown.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, thanks. I'll give that a try.
>>>
>>>  -Tom
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 5:44 PM, Sebastien Jourdain <
>>> sebastien.jourd...@kitware.com> wrote:
>>>
 You need ParaView 5.5.2 or master as I said last time, I fixed some
 stuff on the python side to properly register animation on a given view.
 Or you may have patched your ParaView. But for sure, you need Python
 code along with the pvw change I made.

 On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 1:12 PM Sgouros, Thomas <
 thomas_sgou...@brown.edu> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 10:43 AM, Sebastien Jourdain <
> sebastien.jourd...@kitware.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> - The mouse handler seems to listen only to one view...
>>
>> I though the example in https://github.com/Kitware/
>> paraviewweb-examples was taking care of that. Or maybe I don't
>> understand what you mean here.
>>
>
> I'm not really sure if it is or it isn't. It may be an illusion
> created by the other problem, but I don't know how to tell for sure which
> view is listening.
>
>
>
>> - The behavior I observe is that one of the views moves...
>>
>> That could be possible but are you using the latest ParaView/master?
>> Normally any registered view should receive a stream of images. With the
>> fix I've done last time for the multi-view.
>>
>>
> The example you wrote behaves this way for me, too, even when I link
> the views (see patch attached). One moves with the cursor and the other
> only moves when you lift up the mouse button. Change the sphere to
> something you can see move better and you'll see. I'm using the 
> ParaViewWeb
> 3.2.2 that you made. Or are you talking about Paraview itself? That's at
> 5.5.0rc3. Were there relevant changes since then?
>
>
>
>> - When I make one of the views invisible...
>>
>> Do you still have a css / size issue when you make it available
>> again? You need to inspect the DOM to see where that component is present
>> (area of active).
>> Then does interacting on that area is not enough to get the images, or
>> interacting does not work because the "active" area has a size 0x0?
>>
>>
> I did fix the css / size issue that was pestering me last week. Your
> explanation has the air of plausibility, but I don't completely understand
> how this would work. Can you suggest how I would find the size of the
> active area?
>
> Thanks,
>
>  -Tom
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 6:38 AM Sgouros, Thomas <
>> thomas_sgou...@brown.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All:
>>>
>>> I'm working on a ParaViewWeb client talking to a pvpython server
>>> that shows two linked renderviews. The link works, and it all looks 
>>> great,
>>> but there remain a couple of oddities I can't 

Re: [Paraview] paraviewweb, linked views, mouse handler

[Sebastien Jourdain]

So ParaView 5.5.2 still don't have the correct code base, but
ParaView/master works exactly as expected...

If you look back at our previous email thread, I must have highlighted  to
you what was the change I had to do on the server side, which you can
easily pick since it is just Python code with your current ParaView version.

On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 9:11 PM Sgouros, Thomas 
wrote:

> Hi Sebastien:
>
> Actually no, that doesn't change this behavior. One view moves with the
> cursor when I click on it, while the other only moves when the mouse button
> is lifted. This is true on your example, as well as my code, and I seem
> unable to control which one is which. Are you saying your example works
> differently for you?
>
> Thanks,
>
>  -Tom
>
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 8:53 PM, Sgouros, Thomas  > wrote:
>
>> Ok, thanks. I'll give that a try.
>>
>>  -Tom
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 5:44 PM, Sebastien Jourdain <
>> sebastien.jourd...@kitware.com> wrote:
>>
>>> You need ParaView 5.5.2 or master as I said last time, I fixed some
>>> stuff on the python side to properly register animation on a given view.
>>> Or you may have patched your ParaView. But for sure, you need Python
>>> code along with the pvw change I made.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 1:12 PM Sgouros, Thomas <
>>> thomas_sgou...@brown.edu> wrote:
>>>


 On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 10:43 AM, Sebastien Jourdain <
 sebastien.jourd...@kitware.com> wrote:

> Hi Tom,
>
> - The mouse handler seems to listen only to one view...
>
> I though the example in
> https://github.com/Kitware/paraviewweb-examples was taking care of
> that. Or maybe I don't understand what you mean here.
>

 I'm not really sure if it is or it isn't. It may be an illusion created
 by the other problem, but I don't know how to tell for sure which view is
 listening.



> - The behavior I observe is that one of the views moves...
>
> That could be possible but are you using the latest ParaView/master?
> Normally any registered view should receive a stream of images. With the
> fix I've done last time for the multi-view.
>
>
 The example you wrote behaves this way for me, too, even when I link
 the views (see patch attached). One moves with the cursor and the other
 only moves when you lift up the mouse button. Change the sphere to
 something you can see move better and you'll see. I'm using the ParaViewWeb
 3.2.2 that you made. Or are you talking about Paraview itself? That's at
 5.5.0rc3. Were there relevant changes since then?



> - When I make one of the views invisible...
>
> Do you still have a css / size issue when you make it available again?
> You need to inspect the DOM to see where that component is present (area 
> of
> active).
> Then does interacting on that area is not enough to get the images, or
> interacting does not work because the "active" area has a size 0x0?
>
>
 I did fix the css / size issue that was pestering me last week. Your
 explanation has the air of plausibility, but I don't completely understand
 how this would work. Can you suggest how I would find the size of the
 active area?

 Thanks,

  -Tom




 On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 6:38 AM Sgouros, Thomas <
> thomas_sgou...@brown.edu> wrote:
>
>> Hi All:
>>
>> I'm working on a ParaViewWeb client talking to a pvpython server that
>> shows two linked renderviews. The link works, and it all looks great, but
>> there remain a couple of oddities I can't seem to squeeze out:
>>
>>  - The mouse handler seems to listen only to one view, and I can't
>> seem to control which one it pays attention to. How can I demand it 
>> listen
>> to one or the other?
>>
>>  - The behavior I observe is that one of the views moves with the
>> mouse on a click and the other catches up when I release it. They do not
>> move together, although this is close enough. Is this the expected 
>> behavior?
>>
>> A possibly relevant data point: On the machine where the pvpython
>> server is running, there is a little undecorated window that appears, and
>> the view that I see in there is the one that moves with the mouse. But I
>> can't seem to control which view is visible there. Most of the time it
>> seems to be the one I draw second, but not all the time. What is this
>> window and what can it tell me?
>>
>> One other issue:
>>
>>  - When I make one of the views invisible (by simply not rendering it
>> in the parent React object) I can't get it to render when it reappears. 
>> The
>> render function is being invoked, but nothing appears. If I refresh the
>> whole page, it appears again.
>>
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>>  -Tom
>> 

Re: [Paraview] Setting a specific time in pvpython

[Cory Quammen]

Juan,

In newer versions of ParaView (5.5.2 was released just a couple days ago),
you can use the Force Time filter to lock a data set at a specific time. In
Python, this looks like

# create a new 'Force Time'

forceTime1 = ForceTime(Input=canex2)


# Properties modified on forceTime1

forceTime1.ForcedTime = 20.0


Here, I am forcing the data set to be at time 20.0.

See this post which may further address what you are trying to do:
https://discourse.paraview.org/t/how-to-displace-by-time-t-time-0/138

Thanks!
Cory

p.s. We are moving community support to https://discourse.paraview.org/.
Please post additional help requests on that forum.


On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 3:24 AM ROJAS-CARRILLO Juan-javier <
jroja...@ens-paris-saclay.fr> wrote:

>
> Hi all,
>
>  From a simulation in Paraview Python (V.4.3.1), I need to extract the
> displacement from a specific time. What I have tried (without success)
> to set the time I want is to use the following commands in my pvython
> script:
>
> animationScene1.AnimationTime = 200.0
>
> Also tried,
>
> animationScene1.PlayMode = 'Sequence'
>
> # Properties modified on animationScene1
> animationScene1.LockStartTime = 0
>
> animationScene1.Play()
>
> animationScene1.LockEndTime = 200
> animationScene1.UpdateAnimationUsingDataTimeSteps()
>
> Is there another way in which I can set a specific time here?
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
> Juan
>
> ___
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> ParaView discussion is moving! Please visit
> https://discourse.paraview.org/ for future posts.
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
> http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>
> Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>


-- 
Cory Quammen
Staff R Engineer
Kitware, Inc.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com

ParaView discussion is moving! Please visit https://discourse.paraview.org/ for 
future posts.

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

[Paraview] Unwrap rotational 3D geometry

[Axtmann Gabriel]

Hi guys,

I am wondering if you guys have a script as (programmable filter) which 
unrolls rotational 3D geometry (eg axial fan) which you could share.


Thanks in advance,

Gabriel

--
===
Dipl.-Ing. Axtmann Gabriel
Institut für Aerodynamik und Gasdynamik
Universität Stuttgart
Pfaffenwaldring 21, 70550 Stuttgart

Tel.:   +49-(0)711-685-63548
e-mail: axtm...@iag.uni-stuttgart.de


___
Powered by www.kitware.com

ParaView discussion is moving! Please visit https://discourse.paraview.org/ for 
future posts.

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview

[Paraview] Setting a specific time in pvpython

[ROJAS-CARRILLO Juan-javier]

Hi all,

From a simulation in Paraview Python (V.4.3.1), I need to extract the  
displacement from a specific time. What I have tried (without success)  
to set the time I want is to use the following commands in my pvython  
script:


animationScene1.AnimationTime = 200.0

Also tried,

animationScene1.PlayMode = 'Sequence'

# Properties modified on animationScene1
animationScene1.LockStartTime = 0

animationScene1.Play()

animationScene1.LockEndTime = 200
animationScene1.UpdateAnimationUsingDataTimeSteps()

Is there another way in which I can set a specific time here?

Thanks a lot!

Juan

___
Powered by www.kitware.com

ParaView discussion is moving! Please visit https://discourse.paraview.org/ for 
future posts.

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
https://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview