Jeremy Kerr writes:
> Hi Ilya,
>
>> Ugh. Yeah, the checks/ requests are definitely something we can
>> improve. Aaron is working on removing vast majority of this type of
>> requests as we speak. Hopefully, that will be done soon.
>
> OK, sounds good!
>
>> Do you think it'll be fine to unban the robot once it doesn't run that
>> many requests on the checks/ API in particular? (I expect the number
>> of requests to be less than a 100-ish per day after the fix.)
>
> Yes, definitely. I'm okay with unbanning it sooner, if it's doing useful
> stuff, and we can contain the load somewhat, and/or we need to test
> against production data.
Thanks for help identifying the API usage - I've pushed a new series
that should reduce it quite a bit. I'm hoping we can unban the RH
robot.
If it continues to show issues, we can address it as well.
> (more that I wasn't sure if it was a legitimate use of the API
> earlier, hence reducing the load via the nft rule)
I've added a custom set of user agents so we can see that it is at least
our set of patchwork polling / updating CI scripts. Hopefully that also
will help to characterize if the robot is doing too heavy of a workload.
>> That might be useful, thanks!
>
> OK, I will send that separately.
Thanks!
> Cheers,
>
>
> Jeremy
___
Patchwork mailing list
Patchwork@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/patchwork
