Easy CDDA Extractor 821
Well! I can't for the life of me understand why the writer changed the check/unchecked notification feature at all. It use to work just fine and it did not do anything bad to the program so why bother with it. I purchased the program back in early 2000/20001 and that original version allowed you to just arrow up and down the list and it would let you know which track was checked or unchecked. In fact, there was an option in the settings area that asked you whether or not you wanted to use check boxes or not. With this checked to yes ensured you would have this data read or you could set things with checkboxes and know whether or not a track was selected or not. The layout acts the same, so why not put it back. I just can't understand why programmers feel they must tamper with things that work. There is absolutely nothing improved in the program by making this info ungettable. I would say to the programmer "put it back and make the program better for us all." James Robinsonothehc ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Easy CDDA Extractor 821
have you suggested it to him? - Original Message - From: "Jardata_Mailservices" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 8:28 AM Subject: Easy CDDA Extractor 821 Well! I can't for the life of me understand why the writer changed the check/unchecked notification feature at all. It use to work just fine and it did not do anything bad to the program so why bother with it. I purchased the program back in early 2000/20001 and that original version allowed you to just arrow up and down the list and it would let you know which track was checked or unchecked. In fact, there was an option in the settings area that asked you whether or not you wanted to use check boxes or not. With this checked to yes ensured you would have this data read or you could set things with checkboxes and know whether or not a track was selected or not. The layout acts the same, so why not put it back. I just can't understand why programmers feel they must tamper with things that work. There is absolutely nothing improved in the program by making this info ungettable. I would say to the programmer "put it back and make the program better for us all." James Robinsonothehc ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Easy CDDA Extractor 821
have you suggested it to him? - Original Message - From: "Jardata_Mailservices" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 8:28 AM Subject: Easy CDDA Extractor 821 Well! I can't for the life of me understand why the writer changed the check/unchecked notification feature at all. It use to work just fine and it did not do anything bad to the program so why bother with it. I purchased the program back in early 2000/20001 and that original version allowed you to just arrow up and down the list and it would let you know which track was checked or unchecked. In fact, there was an option in the settings area that asked you whether or not you wanted to use check boxes or not. With this checked to yes ensured you would have this data read or you could set things with checkboxes and know whether or not a track was selected or not. The layout acts the same, so why not put it back. I just can't understand why programmers feel they must tamper with things that work. There is absolutely nothing improved in the program by making this info ungettable. I would say to the programmer "put it back and make the program better for us all." James Robinsonothehc ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Easy CDDA Extractor 821
Hi, Well instead of grumbeling about it here, why don't you write to him and ask? Best regards Brian - Original Message - From: "Jardata_Mailservices" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 5:28 PM Subject: Easy CDDA Extractor 821 Well! I can't for the life of me understand why the writer changed the check/unchecked notification feature at all. It use to work just fine and it did not do anything bad to the program so why bother with it. I purchased the program back in early 2000/20001 and that original version allowed you to just arrow up and down the list and it would let you know which track was checked or unchecked. In fact, there was an option in the settings area that asked you whether or not you wanted to use check boxes or not. With this checked to yes ensured you would have this data read or you could set things with checkboxes and know whether or not a track was selected or not. The layout acts the same, so why not put it back. I just can't understand why programmers feel they must tamper with things that work. There is absolutely nothing improved in the program by making this info ungettable. I would say to the programmer "put it back and make the program better for us all." James Robinsonothehc ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Easy CDDA Extractor 821
Hi, I just bought a copy of the new release for myself, and from what I read on the site it seems that this developer is open to correspondence from users. I suggest you simply write to him exactly what you've written here, and see what he says. Maybe no one has made this observation to him yet, and he'll be happy to learn that it's a problem. iply - Original Message - From: "Jardata_Mailservices" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 8:28 AM Subject: Easy CDDA Extractor 821 Well! I can't for the life of me understand why the writer changed the check/unchecked notification feature at all. It use to work just fine and it did not do anything bad to the program so why bother with it. I purchased the program back in early 2000/20001 and that original version allowed you to just arrow up and down the list and it would let you know which track was checked or unchecked. In fact, there was an option in the settings area that asked you whether or not you wanted to use check boxes or not. With this checked to yes ensured you would have this data read or you could set things with checkboxes and know whether or not a track was selected or not. The layout acts the same, so why not put it back. I just can't understand why programmers feel they must tamper with things that work. There is absolutely nothing improved in the program by making this info ungettable. I would say to the programmer "put it back and make the program better for us all." James Robinsonothehc ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.9/42 - Release Date: 7/6/2005 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.9/42 - Release Date: 7/6/2005 ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Easy CDDA Extractor 821
I think one possible reason why this checkbox no longer speaks is because in recent versions of Easy CD DA Extractor there is now a graphic of a musical note to the left of each check box. I'm sure the author of Easy CD DA Extractor didn't make this program inaccessible deliberately. However there is strong pressure these days to use a lot of non-standard Windows controls to add what is called "eye candy" to keep people's interest and attention. You only have to look at how many skins there are to change the appearance of many programs as well as the large number of visualization plug-ins for programs such as RealPlayer and Winamp and many others. I think the real challenge here is to find a way to use "eye candy" and still make sure programs are accessible. At 01:28 AM 7/07/2005, you wrote: I can't for the life of me understand why the writer changed the check/unchecked notification feature at all. It use to work just fine and it did not do anything bad to the program so why bother with it. I purchased the program back in early 2000/20001 and that original version allowed you to just arrow up and down the list and it would let you know which track was checked or unchecked. In fact, there was an option in the settings area that asked you whether or not you wanted to use check boxes or not. With this checked to yes ensured you would have this data read or you could set things with checkboxes and know whether or not a track was selected or not. The layout acts the same, so why not put it back. I just can't understand why programmers feel they must tamper with things that work. There is absolutely nothing improved in the program by making this info ungettable. I would say to the programmer "put it back and make the program better for us all." Regards Steve, Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype: steve1963 ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Easy CDDA Extractor 821
Hi Steve. I'd hold out for accessibility, rather than eye candy. - Original Message - From: "Steve Pattison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 9:31 AM Subject: Re: Easy CDDA Extractor 821 I think one possible reason why this checkbox no longer speaks is because in recent versions of Easy CD DA Extractor there is now a graphic of a musical note to the left of each check box. I'm sure the author of Easy CD DA Extractor didn't make this program inaccessible deliberately. However there is strong pressure these days to use a lot of non-standard Windows controls to add what is called "eye candy" to keep people's interest and attention. You only have to look at how many skins there are to change the appearance of many programs as well as the large number of visualization plug-ins for programs such as RealPlayer and Winamp and many others. I think the real challenge here is to find a way to use "eye candy" and still make sure programs are accessible. At 01:28 AM 7/07/2005, you wrote: I can't for the life of me understand why the writer changed the check/unchecked notification feature at all. It use to work just fine and it did not do anything bad to the program so why bother with it. I purchased the program back in early 2000/20001 and that original version allowed you to just arrow up and down the list and it would let you know which track was checked or unchecked. In fact, there was an option in the settings area that asked you whether or not you wanted to use check boxes or not. With this checked to yes ensured you would have this data read or you could set things with checkboxes and know whether or not a track was selected or not. The layout acts the same, so why not put it back. I just can't understand why programmers feel they must tamper with things that work. There is absolutely nothing improved in the program by making this info ungettable. I would say to the programmer "put it back and make the program better for us all." Regards Steve, Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype: steve1963 ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Easy CDDA Extractor 821
You might be holding out quite a while, then, because eye candy is the way of the future and if we're not going to come up with ways to work with it, we'll be S.O.L. in the real world, a world where sighted people comprise the majority and don't want to be held back any more than we do. Bruce -- Bruce Toews E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): http://www.ogts.net Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com On Sat, 9 Jul 2005, Gary Wood wrote: Hi Steve. I'd hold out for accessibility, rather than eye candy. - Original Message - From: "Steve Pattison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 9:31 AM Subject: Re: Easy CDDA Extractor 821 I think one possible reason why this checkbox no longer speaks is because in recent versions of Easy CD DA Extractor there is now a graphic of a musical note to the left of each check box. I'm sure the author of Easy CD DA Extractor didn't make this program inaccessible deliberately. However there is strong pressure these days to use a lot of non-standard Windows controls to add what is called "eye candy" to keep people's interest and attention. You only have to look at how many skins there are to change the appearance of many programs as well as the large number of visualization plug-ins for programs such as RealPlayer and Winamp and many others. I think the real challenge here is to find a way to use "eye candy" and still make sure programs are accessible. At 01:28 AM 7/07/2005, you wrote: > I can't for the life of me understand why the writer changed the > check/unchecked notification feature at all. It use to work just fine > and it did not do anything bad to the program so why bother with it. I > purchased the program back in early 2000/20001 and that original version > allowed you to just arrow up and down the list and it would let you know > which track was checked or unchecked. In fact, there was an option in > the settings area that asked you whether or not you wanted to use check > boxes or not. With this checked to yes ensured you would have this data > read or you could set things with checkboxes and know whether or not a > track was selected or not. The layout acts the same, so why not put it > back. I just can't understand why programmers feel they must tamper with > things that work. There is absolutely nothing improved in the program by > making this info ungettable. > > I would say to the programmer "put it back and make the program better > for us all." Regards Steve, Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype: steve1963 ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Easy CDDA Extractor 821
Hi Bruce. Thanks for that. That's a good point. It makes sense. I wouldn't want to discourage anyone from using the computer. It's a great tool for everyone! - Original Message - From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2005 11:11 PM Subject: Re: Easy CDDA Extractor 821 You might be holding out quite a while, then, because eye candy is the way of the future and if we're not going to come up with ways to work with it, we'll be S.O.L. in the real world, a world where sighted people comprise the majority and don't want to be held back any more than we do. Bruce -- Bruce Toews E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries): http://www.ogts.net Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com On Sat, 9 Jul 2005, Gary Wood wrote: Hi Steve. I'd hold out for accessibility, rather than eye candy. - Original Message - From: "Steve Pattison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 9:31 AM Subject: Re: Easy CDDA Extractor 821 I think one possible reason why this checkbox no longer speaks is because in recent versions of Easy CD DA Extractor there is now a graphic of a musical note to the left of each check box. I'm sure the author of Easy CD DA Extractor didn't make this program inaccessible deliberately. However there is strong pressure these days to use a lot of non-standard Windows controls to add what is called "eye candy" to keep people's interest and attention. You only have to look at how many skins there are to change the appearance of many programs as well as the large number of visualization plug-ins for programs such as RealPlayer and Winamp and many others. I think the real challenge here is to find a way to use "eye candy" and still make sure programs are accessible. At 01:28 AM 7/07/2005, you wrote: > I can't for the life of me understand why the writer changed the > check/unchecked notification feature at all. It use to work just fine > and it did not do anything bad to the program so why bother with it. > I purchased the program back in early 2000/20001 and that original > version allowed you to just arrow up and down the list and it would > let you know which track was checked or unchecked. In fact, there was > an option in the settings area that asked you whether or not you > wanted to use check boxes or not. With this checked to yes ensured > you would have this data read or you could set things with checkboxes > and know whether or not a track was selected or not. The layout acts > the same, so why not put it back. I just can't understand why > programmers feel they must tamper with things that work. There is > absolutely nothing improved in the program by making this info > ungettable. > > I would say to the programmer "put it back and make the program better > for us all." Regards Steve, Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype: steve1963 ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Easy CDDA Extractor 821 what is it?
Hello everyone: sorry for getting on this topic a bit late but could someone please tell me what is this program all about? Or where can I find some info about it? thanks very much in advance Juan Sosa Skype owner/moderator of [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] skype: mexican2004 - Original Message - From: "Brian Olesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 3:34 AM Subject: Re: Easy CDDA Extractor 821 Hi, Well instead of grumbeling about it here, why don't you write to him and ask? Best regards Brian - Original Message - From: "Jardata_Mailservices" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 5:28 PM Subject: Easy CDDA Extractor 821 Well! I can't for the life of me understand why the writer changed the check/unchecked notification feature at all. It use to work just fine and it did not do anything bad to the program so why bother with it. I purchased the program back in early 2000/20001 and that original version allowed you to just arrow up and down the list and it would let you know which track was checked or unchecked. In fact, there was an option in the settings area that asked you whether or not you wanted to use check boxes or not. With this checked to yes ensured you would have this data read or you could set things with checkboxes and know whether or not a track was selected or not. The layout acts the same, so why not put it back. I just can't understand why programmers feel they must tamper with things that work. There is absolutely nothing improved in the program by making this info ungettable. I would say to the programmer "put it back and make the program better for us all." James Robinsonothehc ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ NOD32 1.1162 (20050706) Information __ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Easy CDDA Extractor 821 what is it?
I believe you can find it at Poikasoft.com. I hope I have that right. It's a CD ripping and burning program. - Original Message - From: "Juan Sosa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 9:37 AM Subject: Easy CDDA Extractor 821 what is it? Hello everyone: sorry for getting on this topic a bit late but could someone please tell me what is this program all about? Or where can I find some info about it? thanks very much in advance Juan Sosa Skype owner/moderator of [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] skype: mexican2004 - Original Message - From: "Brian Olesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 3:34 AM Subject: Re: Easy CDDA Extractor 821 Hi, Well instead of grumbeling about it here, why don't you write to him and ask? Best regards Brian - Original Message - From: "Jardata_Mailservices" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 5:28 PM Subject: Easy CDDA Extractor 821 Well! I can't for the life of me understand why the writer changed the check/unchecked notification feature at all. It use to work just fine and it did not do anything bad to the program so why bother with it. I purchased the program back in early 2000/20001 and that original version allowed you to just arrow up and down the list and it would let you know which track was checked or unchecked. In fact, there was an option in the settings area that asked you whether or not you wanted to use check boxes or not. With this checked to yes ensured you would have this data read or you could set things with checkboxes and know whether or not a track was selected or not. The layout acts the same, so why not put it back. I just can't understand why programmers feel they must tamper with things that work. There is absolutely nothing improved in the program by making this info ungettable. I would say to the programmer "put it back and make the program better for us all." James Robinsonothehc ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ NOD32 1.1162 (20050706) Information __ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
