Re: [pca] different directory for patches

2013-01-23 Thread Stevenson, Bradley (NE)
Was there a solution to this problem ?  We are considering the use of this tool 
in our
Environment but we do have linked directories for /var/sadm/pkg on some of our 
servers.

Thanks,

Brad
CSC Unix Adminstrator


From: pca-boun...@lists.univie.ac.at [mailto:pca-boun...@lists.univie.ac.at] On 
Behalf Of McGranahan, Jamen
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 12:38 PM
To: PCA (Patch Check Advanced) Discussion (pca@lists.univie.ac.at)
Subject: [pca] different directory for patches

Is there a way I can force patchadd to look in a different directory than the 
default /var/sadm/pkg directory? We created a softlink from /var/sadm/pkg to 
/apps/sadm/pkg (due to space issues), but now patchadd always fails:

Directory is expected, found link - /var/sadm/pkg.
Failed (exit code 1)

Showrev -p does fine; and downloading the patches with pca -d does fine as 
well. It's just the actual installation of the patches where it fails. I'm 
pretty sure I had this fixed before, but honestly, I don't remember what I did 
(plan to DOCUMENT what I do this time!). Any ideas/suggestions would be greatly 
appreciated! Thanks!

Jamen McGranahan
Systems Services Librarian
Vanderbilt University LIbrary
Central Library
Room 811
419 21st Avenue South
Nashville, TN 37214



Re: [pca] different directory for patches

2013-01-23 Thread Martin Paul

Am 23.01.2013 15:06, schrieb Stevenson, Bradley (NE):

Was there a solution to this problem ?  We are considering the use of this tool 
in our
Environment but we do have linked directories for /var/sadm/pkg on some of our 
servers.


The solution is to *not* use a symbolic link for /var/sadm/pkg/. That's 
an issue with Suns/Oracles patch tools (like patchadd), BTW, and not PCA.


As Dagobert mentioned, use a loopback mount instead:

  rm /var/sadm/pkg
  mkdir /var/sadm/pkg
  mount -F lofs /apps/sadm/pkg /var/sadm/pkg

You can also make this permanent via vfstab.

hth,
Martin.



Re: [pca] different directory for patches

2013-01-23 Thread Martin Paul

Am 23.01.2013 15:30, schrieb Stevenson, Bradley (NE):

What if its /var/sadm that is linked. Would using the loopback
Method work in this case as well ?


Yes, it's highly recommended.

Google for /var/sadm symbolic link for more examples of this 
recommendation.


hth,
Martin.



Re: [pca] different directory for patches

2013-01-23 Thread Stevenson, Bradley (NE)
What if its /var/sadm that is linked. Would using the loopback 
Method work in this case as well ?



-Original Message-
From: pca-boun...@lists.univie.ac.at [mailto:pca-boun...@lists.univie.ac.at] On 
Behalf Of Martin Paul
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 8:20 AM
To: PCA (Patch Check Advanced) Discussion
Subject: Re: [pca] different directory for patches

Am 23.01.2013 15:06, schrieb Stevenson, Bradley (NE):
 Was there a solution to this problem ?  We are considering the use of 
 this tool in our Environment but we do have linked directories for 
 /var/sadm/pkg on some of our servers.

The solution is to *not* use a symbolic link for /var/sadm/pkg/. That's an 
issue with Suns/Oracles patch tools (like patchadd), BTW, and not PCA.

As Dagobert mentioned, use a loopback mount instead:

   rm /var/sadm/pkg
   mkdir /var/sadm/pkg
   mount -F lofs /apps/sadm/pkg /var/sadm/pkg

You can also make this permanent via vfstab.

hth,
Martin.




Re: [pca] different directory for patches

2013-01-23 Thread Stevenson, Bradley (NE)
Great! Does anyone know if the script will do disk space checking so it knows
How much disk space it needs to install the patches. Or does anyone have a
Script to do this ?

Brad



-Original Message-
From: pca-boun...@lists.univie.ac.at [mailto:pca-boun...@lists.univie.ac.at] On 
Behalf Of Brookins, Neil (Philadelphia)
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 9:30 AM
To: 'pca@lists.univie.ac.at'
Subject: Re: [pca] different directory for patches

Last week, after reading Dagobert's email about the loopback, I tested it on 
one of my servers which had a sym link for /var/sadm and it worked beautifully.
I was able to reboot and it mounted the loopback correctly from the vfstab 
entry too. Now I'm able to install new patches without the sym link getting 
removed.

What had been happening (with the sym link) is that some patch installs worked 
ok, others would blow away the sym link. Then the next patch attempt would fail 
because it thought the dependency was missing because the list of existing 
patches was no longer accessible.


Neil Brookins

- Original Message -
From: Stevenson, Bradley (NE) [mailto:bradley.steven...@gd-ais.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 09:30 AM
To: PCA (Patch Check Advanced) Discussion pca@lists.univie.ac.at
Subject: Re: [pca] different directory for patches

What if its /var/sadm that is linked. Would using the loopback Method work in 
this case as well ?



-Original Message-
From: pca-boun...@lists.univie.ac.at [mailto:pca-boun...@lists.univie.ac.at] On 
Behalf Of Martin Paul
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 8:20 AM
To: PCA (Patch Check Advanced) Discussion
Subject: Re: [pca] different directory for patches

Am 23.01.2013 15:06, schrieb Stevenson, Bradley (NE):
 Was there a solution to this problem ?  We are considering the use of 
 this tool in our Environment but we do have linked directories for 
 /var/sadm/pkg on some of our servers.

The solution is to *not* use a symbolic link for /var/sadm/pkg/. That's an 
issue with Suns/Oracles patch tools (like patchadd), BTW, and not PCA.

As Dagobert mentioned, use a loopback mount instead:

   rm /var/sadm/pkg
   mkdir /var/sadm/pkg
   mount -F lofs /apps/sadm/pkg /var/sadm/pkg

You can also make this permanent via vfstab.

hth,
Martin.



Notice of Confidentiality
This transmission contains information that may be confidential. It has been 
prepared for the sole and exclusive use of the intended recipient and on the 
basis agreed with that person. If you are not the intended recipient of the 
message (or authorized to receive it for the intended recipient), you should 
notify us immediately; you should delete it from your system and may not 
disclose its contents to anyone else.


This e-mail has come to you from Towers Watson Delaware Inc.