[Pce] Adoption of draft-king-pce-inter-area-as-applicability-02.txt as a PCE WG document

2010-10-17 Thread JP Vasseur 
Dear authors,

There is a consensus to adopt draft-king-pce-inter-area-as-applicability-02.txt 
as a PCE WG document.

Please resubmit as draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability-00.txt with no 
change other than dates, name and title.

Thanks.

JP.___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] Adopting draft-king-pce-inter-area-as-applicability-02.txt as a PCE WG document

2010-10-17 Thread Fatai Zhang 
Yes/Support.




Best Regards
 
Fatai
 
  - Original Message - 
  From: Giovanni Martinelli 
  To: JP Vasseur 
  Cc: olivier.dug...@orange-ftgroup.com ; pce@ietf.org ; Quintin Zhao 
  Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2010 3:23 PM
  Subject: Re: [Pce] Adopting draft-king-pce-inter-area-as-applicability-02.txt 
as a PCE WG document


  Support.

  Cheers
  G

  On 10/12/10 9:50 PM, JP Vasseur wrote: 
Thanks Dan for this new revision. Major progress, thanks, this is part of 
our milstones, good to see 
some progress. Even if there is lot of work to do on this ID, this is 
probably a good time to poll the 
WG to adopt it as the base document for inter-area-as applicability.


All, are you in favor/opposed in adopting 
draft-king-pce-inter-area-as-applicability-02.txt as a PCE Wg
document ?


Thanks.


JP.


Begin forwarded message:


  From: "Daniel King" 

  Date: October 11, 2010 11:28:10 PM GMT+02:00

  To: 

  Cc: olivier.dug...@orange-ftgroup.com, f...@tid.es, qz...@huawei.com

  Subject: [Pce] I-D 
Action:draft-king-pce-inter-area-as-applicability-02.txt



  Hi PCE'rs, 

  Please find a new version of our pce-inter-area-as-applicability draft: 

  http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-king-pce-inter-area-as-applicability-02.txt

  This document examines the applicability of the PCE architecture, 
protocols,
  and protocol extensions for computing multi-area and multi-AS paths in 
MPLS
  and GMPLS networks.

  This revision combines the addition of new co-authors and various updates
  including:

  - Discussion on domain meshes. 
  - Discussion on route diversity. 
  - Discussion on synchronized path computations. 
  - Minor readability updates. 
  - Minor grammar and nit fixes.

  The document is not complete and will require further revisions. It is
  however a good platform to build upon and as always we seek WG feedback 
and
  suggestions.

  See you in Beijing!

  Br, Dan

  ___
  Pce mailing list
  Pce@ietf.org
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce




___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce


--


  ___
  Pce mailing list
  Pce@ietf.org
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce