Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-farrkingel-pce-questions

[Jan Medved (jmedved)]

+1

On 6/21/13 12:45 PM, "Edward Crabbe" mailto:e...@google.com>> 
wrote:

Support.


On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 3:19 AM, 
mailto:durga_uu...@yahoo.com>> wrote:
Support.


Brgds, Durgaprasad "DG"  Gangisetti.

On Jun 19, 2013, at 9:38 AM, Julien Meuric 
mailto:julien.meu...@orange.com>> wrote:

Dear WG,

Following the discussion about the future of the aforementioned document and 
the feedback sent to the list, this message starts a poll for the adoption of 
draft-farrkingel-pce-questions-03 by the PCE WG.
Pay attention to the document scope: the goal is _not_ to leave the I-D open to 
gather all questions about PCE, but to store some useful text associated to PCE 
by moving forward as an informational document.

Please send your support/opposition to the PCE mailing list (the latter 
typically requiring some explanation). Detailed comments on the I-D are also 
welcome.

Thanks,

JP & Julien

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce


___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

[Pce] Stateful PCE applicability

[Ina Minei]

Dear chairs and working group,

In light of the recent working group re-charter which now includes stateful 
PCE, we wanted to hear the opinions of the group on

1.  the need for an applicability document for stateful PCE and

2.  whether draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app satisfies this need, or any 
gaps it might have

Thank you,

Ina and Xian

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce