[Pce] 答复: Adoption of draft-lopez-pce-pceps-02 as PCE WG Document ?

2014-03-06 Thread Fatai Zhang

Support.


Thanks

Fatai


-邮件原件-
发件人: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 JP Vasseur (jvasseur)
发送时间: 2014年3月4日 17:48
收件人: pce@ietf.org
主题: [Pce] Adoption of draft-lopez-pce-pceps-02 as PCE WG Document ?

Dear WG,

As discussed during the PCE WG meeting today where we had good support for 
adopting draft-lopez-pce-pceps-02 as a WG document, as usual, we would like to 
confirm on the mailing list.

Would you be in favor/opposed (and why if you want to justify) of adopting 
draft-lopez-pce-pceps-02 as a WG document ?

Thanks.

JP and Julien.
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce


[Pce] 答复: Adoption of draft-minei-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations as PCE WG Document?

2014-03-06 Thread Fatai Zhang
Support.


Thanks

Fatai



-邮件原件-
发件人: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Julien Meuric
发送时间: 2014年3月5日 2:12
收件人: pce@ietf.org
主题: [Pce] Adoption of draft-minei-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations as PCE WG 
Document?

Dear WG,

As discussed during the PCE WG meeting today, we had some support for adopting 
draft-minei-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-01 as a PCE WG item.

Would you be in favor/opposed (and why if you want to justify) of adopting it 
as a WG document?

Thanks.

JP and Julien.

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce


[Pce] 答复: Adoption of draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt as PCE WG Document ?

2014-03-06 Thread Fatai Zhang
Support.


Thanks

Fatai




-邮件原件-
发件人: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 JP Vasseur (jvasseur)
发送时间: 2014年3月4日 18:52
收件人: pce@ietf.org
主题: [Pce] Adoption of draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt as PCE WG 
Document ?

Dear WG,

As discussed during the PCE WG meeting today where we had some support for 
adopting draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt 
as a PCE WG.

Would you be in favor/opposed (and why if you want to justify) of adopting 
draft-ali-pce-remote-initiated-gmpls-lsp-03.txt as a WG document ?

Thanks.

JP and Julien.
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce


[Pce] 答复: Question regarding draft-alvarez-pce-path-profiles-01

2014-03-06 Thread Qin Wu
I can see profile identifier can be used between PCC and PCE to refer to and 
exchange local policy information.
Service function chaining (Sfc) can potentially use this mechanism to do 
communicate policy and path computation together.
The other case can be use case described in 3.1 of 
draft-avantika-pce-multi-src-dest-01.

Regards!
-Qin
发件人: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 tang.ke...@zte.com.cn
发送时间: 2014年3月6日 15:17
收件人: saalv...@cisco.com; ms...@cisco.com; z...@cisco.com; 
luis.tomot...@verizon.com; vlo...@tid.es
抄送: pce@ietf.org
主题: [Pce] Question regarding draft-alvarez-pce-path-profiles-01

Dear authors of draft-alvarez-pce-path-profiles-01, please find belolw two 
questions regarding draft draft-alvarez-pce-path-profiles-01:

― What is the main purpose of this draft? I did not see the use case in your 
draft.

― "A path profile represents a list of path parameters or policies that a PCEP 
peer may invoke on a remote peer using a profile identifier."

Could you please give some examples of these path parameters or policies? 
Thanks.

Best Regards,

Kexin
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce