Re: [Pce] Adopting of draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt as PCE WG Document
Yes, support BR Daniele -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur (jvasseur) Sent: domenica 14 settembre 2014 12:06 To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Adopting of draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt as PCE WG Document Dear WG, We had several discussions showing a good consensus adopting draft- sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt and this work has considerably progressed in other WG. Are you in favor of adopting draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt as a PCE WG document ? Thanks. JP and Julien. ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Adopting of draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt as PCE WG Document
Hi, Support as co-author. Thanks! Victor El 15/09/14 09:02, Daniele Ceccarelli daniele.ceccare...@ericsson.com escribió: Yes, support BR Daniele -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur (jvasseur) Sent: domenica 14 settembre 2014 12:06 To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Adopting of draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt as PCE WG Document Dear WG, We had several discussions showing a good consensus adopting draft- sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt and this work has considerably progressed in other WG. Are you in favor of adopting draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt as a PCE WG document ? Thanks. JP and Julien. ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it. Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Adopting of draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt as PCE WG Document
Support -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of VICTOR LOPEZ ALVAREZ Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 11:39 To: pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] Adopting of draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt as PCE WG Document Hi, Support as co-author. Thanks! Victor El 15/09/14 09:02, Daniele Ceccarelli daniele.ceccare...@ericsson.com escribió: Yes, support BR Daniele -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur (jvasseur) Sent: domenica 14 settembre 2014 12:06 To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Adopting of draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt as PCE WG Document Dear WG, We had several discussions showing a good consensus adopting draft- sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt and this work has considerably progressed in other WG. Are you in favor of adopting draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt as a PCE WG document ? Thanks. JP and Julien. ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it. Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
[Pce] FW: Survey on IRO
Hi All, After discussion with the chairs, we would like to close this survey on Friday the 19th September. For those of you who are yet to send the survey, please do that as soon as possible directly to chairs. For those who have submitted already, thanks a lot :) Dhruv -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric Sent: 04 July 2014 23:57 To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Survey on IRO Hi PCE WG. To address the issues associated with draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence and Include Route Object in PCEP, Dhruv has proposed to start a small survey. If implementers agree that we need to clarify this, they would be much welcome to answer the attached questions. Dhruv will process the results, but to improve confidentiality, answers may be sent privately to the chairs. Thanks, JP Julien, on behalf of Dhruv During discussion of draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-04, it has been noted that RFC5440 does not define whether the sub-objects in the IRO are ordered or unordered. We would like to do an informal and *confidential* survey of current implementations, to help clarify this situation. 1. IRO Encoding a. Does your implementation construct IRO? b. If your answer to part (a) is Yes, does your implementation construct the IRO as an ordered list always, sometimes or never? c. If your answer to part (b) is Sometimes, what criteria do you use to decide if the IRO is an ordered or unordered list? d. If your answer to part (b) is Always or Sometimes, does your implementation construct the IRO as a sequence of strict hops or as a sequence of loose hops? 2. IRO Decoding a. Does your implementation decode IRO? b. If your answer to part (a) is Yes, does your implementation interpret the decoded IRO as an ordered list always, sometimes or never? c. If your answer to part (b) is Sometimes, what criteria do you use to decide if the IRO is an ordered or unordered list? d. If your answer to part (b) is Always or Sometimes, does your implementation interpret the IRO as a sequence of strict hops or as a sequence of loose hops? 3. Impact a. Will there be an impact to your implementation if RFC5440 is updated to state that the IRO is an ordered list? b. Will there be an impact to your implementation if RFC 5440 is updated to state that the IRO is an unordered list? c. If RFC 5440 is updated to state that the IRO is an ordered list, will there be an impact to your implementation if RFC 5440 is also updated to allow IRO sub-objects to use the loose bit (L-bit)? 4. Respondents a. Are you a Vendor/Research Lab/Software House/Other (please specify)? b. If your answer to part (a) is Vendor, is the implementation for a shipping product, product under development or a prototype?___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt as a PCE WG Document
Support. Thanks, Rakesh On 2014-09-14 6:06 AM, JP Vasseur (jvasseur) jvass...@cisco.com wrote: Dear WG, We had several discussions showing a good consensus adopting draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt and this work has considerably progressed in other WG. Are you in favor of adopting draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt as a PCE WG document ? Thanks. JP and Julien. ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Adopting of draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt as PCE WG Document
Support. Thanks, Rakesh On 2014-09-14 6:06 AM, JP Vasseur (jvasseur) jvass...@cisco.com wrote: Dear WG, We had several discussions showing a good consensus adopting draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt and this work has considerably progressed in other WG. Are you in favor of adopting draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt as a PCE WG document ? Thanks. JP and Julien. ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
[Pce] draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt
Y'all: Somehow lost the original message -- I would support draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt as a WG doc. :-) Russ ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Adopting of draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt as PCE WG Document
support On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 3:06 AM, JP Vasseur (jvasseur) jvass...@cisco.com wrote: Dear WG, We had several discussions showing a good consensus adopting draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt and this work has considerably progressed in other WG. Are you in favor of adopting draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt as a PCE WG document ? Thanks. JP and Julien. ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Adopting of draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt as PCE WG Document
Support. Regards, Tarek On 2014-09-14, 6:06 AM, JP Vasseur (jvasseur) jvass...@cisco.com wrote: Dear WG, We had several discussions showing a good consensus adopting draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt and this work has considerably progressed in other WG. Are you in favor of adopting draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt as a PCE WG document ? Thanks. JP and Julien. ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-app-02 and draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-09
Support. /himanshu From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur (jvasseur) Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2014 6:12 AM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-app-02 and draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-09 Dear WG, Both draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-app-02 and draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-09 are now stable ready for WG Last Call. This starts a 3-week WG Last call, which will end on Oct 6 at noon ET. Please send your comments on the mailing list. ps: this WG LC will be followed by another WG LC on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-01 and draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-01. Thanks. JP and Julien. ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt as a PCE WG Document
Yes/support Cheers, Jeff We had several discussions showing a good consensus adopting draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt and this work has considerably progressed in other WG. Are you in favor of adopting draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt as a PCE WG document ? Thanks. JP and Julien. ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt
Support as a co-author. Thanks, Siva = Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 10:06:24 + From: JP Vasseur (jvasseur) jvass...@cisco.com To: pce@ietf.org pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt as a PCE WG Document Message-ID: 70e9f53f-3a40-4cc6-924b-9ba229fd8...@cisco.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Dear WG, We had several discussions showing a good consensus adopting draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt and this work has considerably progressed in other WG. Are you in favor of adopting draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt as a PCE WG document ? Thanks. JP and Julien. ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Adopting of draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt
Support as a co-author. Thanks, Siva = Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 10:06:28 + From: JP Vasseur (jvasseur) jvass...@cisco.com To: pce@ietf.org pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Adopting of draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt as PCE WG Document Message-ID: e7530e21-f65e-497f-a6eb-696da8e08...@cisco.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Dear WG, We had several discussions showing a good consensus adopting draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt and this work has considerably progressed in other WG. Are you in favor of adopting draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt as a PCE WG document ? Thanks. JP and Julien. * ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt as a PCE WG Document
Support Best, r. On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 12:06 PM, JP Vasseur (jvasseur) jvass...@cisco.com wrote: Dear WG, We had several discussions showing a good consensus adopting draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt and this work has considerably progressed in other WG. Are you in favor of adopting draft-sivabalan-pce-lsp-setup-type-02.txt as a PCE WG document ? Thanks. JP and Julien. ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
