Re: [Pce] Building the PCE Agenda for IETF 94
Hi all, FYI, the PCE session is now scheduled on Tuesday, from 5:10 to 6:40 pm, right before the social event. By the way, Yokohama meeting is number 94: sorry for the typo in the previous e-mail. Regards, Jon, JP & Julien Oct. 05, 2015 - julien.meu...@orange.com: Dear PCE WG, The IETF preliminary agenda is available (https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/94/agenda.html). The PCE session is _tentatively_ scheduled on Monday from 3:20 to 4:50 pm. Supposing you have issues that _really_ require a slot to progress, please send a request to the chairs and secretary, including: - the topic to discuss, - the expected duration, - the name of the presenter, - the rationale for requesting some face to face time, as opposed to using the mailing list, i.e., the output you expect from your slot. Best regards, JP & Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
[Pce] Last IPR check for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence
Dear authors, Has all IPR that applies to draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules? (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details.) A response from each of you is required. Best regards, Jon, JP & Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Last IPR check for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence
Hi, Yes! ALL IPR has been disclosed. http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1690/ Regards, Dhruv From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick Sent: 13 October 2015 01:26 To: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-seque...@ietf.org Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Last IPR check for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence Dear authors, Has all IPR that applies to draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules? (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details.) A response from each of you is required. Best regards, Jon, JP & Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Home for "PCE as Central Controller"
Dear Jon, JP, Julien, and Lou, Thanks for your suggestions regarding the home for "PCE as Central Controller" and we agree with you to discuss the PCE-CC related requirements/use-cases/architecture in the TEAS working group and to discuss the PCE-CC related PCE extensions in the PCE working group. We will collaborate with the co-authors of ACTN related drafts to identify the overlapping and gaps between ACTN and PCE-CC. We will present these to the TEAS working group and have discussions on it during the incoming IETF94 meeting. Thanks again and see you in Yokohama! Quintin -Original Message- From: julien.meu...@orange.com [mailto:julien.meu...@orange.com] Sent: 2015年10月9日 8:04 To: draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-control...@ietf.org; draft-zhao-pce-central-controller-user-ca...@ietf.org Cc: pce@ietf.org; t...@ietf.org Subject: Home for "PCE as Central Controller" Dear authors of PCE-CC I-Ds, We are following up on Lou's (very last minute ;-) ) comment during the PCE meeting in Prague. The TEAS WG has just endorsed as WG item the "ACTN" work, (quoting the requirement I-D) "so as to facilitate network programmability, automation, efficient resource sharing, and end-to-end virtual service aware connectivity and network function virtualization services". A significant part of the PCE-CC proposal may fall under this umbrella. As a result, we would like to see the related requirements/use-cases/architecture discussed first within TEAS, the PCE WG remaining (obviously) in charge of any identified PCEP extensions. Feel free to contacts the PCE and/or TEAS chairs if some clarifications on the respective charters of the WGs are needed. Thanks, Jon, JP & Julien _ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Last IPR check for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence
El 12/10/2015 a las 21:55, Jonathan Hardwick escribió: Dear authors, Has all IPR that applies to draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules? (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details.) Dear Jon, all AFAIK, all IPR has been disclosed (http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1690/) by its owners. I am not aware of any other IPR that applies to the draft. Thanks Ramon ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
