Re: [Pce] Building the PCE Agenda for IETF 94
Dear all, The PCE agenda is on line (https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/94/agenda/agenda-94-pce). If you have a slot, please send your slides to the chairs and secretary by Sunday, noting that your allocated duration may differ from your original request. Regards, Jon, JP & Julien Oct. 12, 2015 - Julien Meuric: Hi all, FYI, the PCE session is now scheduled on Tuesday, from 5:10 to 6:40 pm, right before the social event. By the way, Yokohama meeting is number 94: sorry for the typo in the previous e-mail. Regards, Jon, JP & Julien Oct. 05, 2015 - julien.meu...@orange.com: Dear PCE WG, The IETF preliminary agenda is available (https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/94/agenda.html). The PCE session is _tentatively_ scheduled on Monday from 3:20 to 4:50 pm. Supposing you have issues that _really_ require a slot to progress, please send a request to the chairs and secretary, including: - the topic to discuss, - the expected duration, - the name of the presenter, - the rationale for requesting some face to face time, as opposed to using the mailing list, i.e., the output you expect from your slot. Best regards, JP & Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
[Pce] Last Call: (Standard Representation of Domain-Sequence) to Experimental RFC
The IESG has received a request from the Path Computation Element WG (pce) to consider the following document: - 'Standard Representation of Domain-Sequence' as Experimental RFC The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the i...@ietf.org mailing lists by 2015-11-09. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to i...@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract The ability to compute shortest constrained Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths (TE LSPs) in Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) and Generalized MPLS (GMPLS) networks across multiple domains has been identified as a key requirement. In this context, a domain is a collection of network elements within a common sphere of address management or path computational responsibility such as an Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP) area or an Autonomous System (AS). This document specifies a standard representation and encoding of a Domain-Sequence, which is defined as an ordered sequence of domains traversed to reach the destination domain to be used by Path Computation Elements (PCEs) to compute inter-domain constrained shortest paths across a predetermined sequence of domains . This document also defines new subobjects to be used to encode domain identifiers. The file can be obtained via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence/ IESG discussion can be tracked via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence/ballot/ The following IPR Declarations may be related to this I-D: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1690/ ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
[Pce] Few queries regarding draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-06 draft
Dear Authors, I have few queries regarding draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-06. 1. We have Overflow-Count, Overflow-Threshold and Underflow-Count, Underflow-Threshold to expedite the process of PCC adjusting the bandwidth instead of waiting for Adjustment-Interval when an abrupt change in bandwidth usage occurs. Similarly, we have Report-Flow-Threshold value for a PCC to report for PCE adjusting bandwidth model instead of waiting for Report-Interval. Can we know if there is rationale behind having different method for PCC controlling bandwidth adjustment and PCE controlling bandwidth adjustment for this case? Why not have the similar mechanism for it ? 2. Once auto-bandwidth adjustment is enabled for an LSP, Couldn't find any way to disable auto adjustment feature for an LSP. It would be good to have a means to disable adjustment without bringing the LSP down. Also, changing auto-bandwidth adjustment mode from PCC to PCE or vice versa without LSP down. Could you please clarify. Thanks :) Regards, Venu ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
