Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06
Support Adoption (obviously!) For easy reviewing, all related files can be found at Github - https://github.com/dhruvdhody-huawei/pcep-yang. You can also choose to provide any change request there (please also post it to the list if you do so). Thanks! Dhruv > -Original Message- > From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric > Sent: 12 August 2016 15:13 > To: pce@ietf.org > Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06 > > Hi all, > > During the joint TEAS-MPLS-PCE Yang session in Berlin, we had a clear > consensus in the room on the interest for the aforementioned I-D. We now > need to see if the mailing list confirms this consensus. As a result, do > you think that draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06 is a right foundation for a PCE > WG document? As usual, comments are very welcome, especially if you do not > support the adoption. > > Thanks, > > JP, Jon & Julien > > ___ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06
Speaking as a co-author, I support the adoption of this draft into the PCE WG. Jon -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric Sent: 12 August 2016 10:43 To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06 Hi all, During the joint TEAS-MPLS-PCE Yang session in Berlin, we had a clear consensus in the room on the interest for the aforementioned I-D. We now need to see if the mailing list confirms this consensus. As a result, do you think that draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06 is a right foundation for a PCE WG document? As usual, comments are very welcome, especially if you do not support the adoption. Thanks, JP, Jon & Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06
Support, Young -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 4:43 AM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06 Hi all, During the joint TEAS-MPLS-PCE Yang session in Berlin, we had a clear consensus in the room on the interest for the aforementioned I-D. We now need to see if the mailing list confirms this consensus. As a result, do you think that draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06 is a right foundation for a PCE WG document? As usual, comments are very welcome, especially if you do not support the adoption. Thanks, JP, Jon & Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06
Support as co-author Cheers, Jeff On 8/12/16, 02:43, "Pce on behalf of Julien Meuric" wrote: Hi all, During the joint TEAS-MPLS-PCE Yang session in Berlin, we had a clear consensus in the room on the interest for the aforementioned I-D. We now need to see if the mailing list confirms this consensus. As a result, do you think that draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06 is a right foundation for a PCE WG document? As usual, comments are very welcome, especially if you do not support the adoption. Thanks, JP, Jon & Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
[Pce] Fwd: [Teas] WG adoption poll draft-zhao-teas-pce-control-function
Just an FYI - the following adoption poll is taking place in the TEAS WG. (Thanks to Adrian for suggesting sending this message!) Forwarded Message Subject:[Teas] WG adoption poll draft-zhao-teas-pce-control-function Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 17:05:25 -0400 From: Lou Berger To: TEAS WG CC: TEAS WG Chairs All, This is start of a two week poll on making draft-zhao-teas-pce-control-function-01 a working group document. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If indicating no, please state your reservations with the document. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document. The poll ends August 31. Thanks, Lou and Pavan ___ Teas mailing list t...@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06
Support. -Qin -邮件原件- 发件人: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Julien Meuric 发送时间: 2016年8月12日 17:43 收件人: pce@ietf.org 主题: [Pce] Adoption of draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06 Hi all, During the joint TEAS-MPLS-PCE Yang session in Berlin, we had a clear consensus in the room on the interest for the aforementioned I-D. We now need to see if the mailing list confirms this consensus. As a result, do you think that draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-06 is a right foundation for a PCE WG document? As usual, comments are very welcome, especially if you do not support the adoption. Thanks, JP, Jon & Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
[Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-12.txt
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element of the IETF. Title : Extensions to the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) to compute service aware Label Switched Path (LSP). Authors : Dhruv Dhody Qin Wu Vishwas Manral Zafar Ali Kenji Kumaki Filename: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-12.txt Pages : 28 Date: 2016-08-17 Abstract: In certain networks, such as, but not limited to, financial information networks (e.g. stock market data providers), network performance criteria (e.g. latency) are becoming as critical to data path selection as other metrics and constraints. These metrics are associated with the Service Level Agreement (SLA) between customers and service providers. The link bandwidth utilization (the total bandwidth of a link in current use for the forwarding) is another important factor to consider during path computation. IGP Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric extensions describe mechanisms with which network performance information is distributed via OSPF and IS-IS respectively. The Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) provides mechanisms for Path Computation Elements (PCEs) to perform path computations in response to Path Computation Clients (PCCs) requests. This document describes the extension to PCEP to carry latency, delay variation, packet loss and link bandwidth utilization as constraints for end to end path computation. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-12 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-12 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-12.txt
Hi WG, This update handles the comments from Chris, as part of the Routing Directorate Review [1]. Another change is in section 6.3 where the repeating of the format of the PCRpt message is removed from this document. See diff [2]. Regards, Dhruv [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/ax1owmoifKFXsjlMJQXczyq8T64 [2] https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-12 > -Original Message- > From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > internet-dra...@ietf.org > Sent: 18 August 2016 10:55 > To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org > Cc: pce@ietf.org > Subject: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-12.txt > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element of the IETF. > > Title : Extensions to the Path Computation Element > Communication Protocol (PCEP) to compute service aware Label Switched Path > (LSP). > Authors : Dhruv Dhody > Qin Wu > Vishwas Manral > Zafar Ali > Kenji Kumaki > Filename: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-12.txt > Pages : 28 > Date: 2016-08-17 > > Abstract: >In certain networks, such as, but not limited to, financial >information networks (e.g. stock market data providers), network >performance criteria (e.g. latency) are becoming as critical to data >path selection as other metrics and constraints. These metrics are >associated with the Service Level Agreement (SLA) between customers >and service providers. The link bandwidth utilization (the total >bandwidth of a link in current use for the forwarding) is another >important factor to consider during path computation. > >IGP Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric extensions describe mechanisms >with which network performance information is distributed via OSPF >and IS-IS respectively. The Path Computation Element Communication >Protocol (PCEP) provides mechanisms for Path Computation Elements >(PCEs) to perform path computations in response to Path Computation >Clients (PCCs) requests. This document describes the extension to >PCEP to carry latency, delay variation, packet loss and link >bandwidth utilization as constraints for end to end path computation. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware/ > > There's also a htmlized version available at: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-12 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-12 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > ___ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
