[Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-yang-05.txt

2017-06-30 Thread internet-drafts

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element of the IETF.

Title   : A YANG Data Model for Path Computation Element 
Communications Protocol (PCEP)
Authors : Dhruv Dhody
  Jonathan Hardwick
  Vishnu Pavan Beeram
  Jeff Tantsura
Filename: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-yang-05.txt
Pages   : 103
Date: 2017-06-30

Abstract:
   This document defines a YANG data model for the management of Path
   Computation Element communications Protocol (PCEP) for communications
   between a Path Computation Client (PCC) and a Path Computation
   Element (PCE), or between two PCEs.  The data model includes
   configuration data and state data (status information and counters
   for the collection of statistics).


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-yang/

There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-yang-05
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-yang-05

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-pcep-yang-05


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce


[Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling-00.txt

2017-06-30 Thread internet-drafts

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element of the IETF.

Title   : PCEP Extensions for LSP scheduling with stateful PCE
Authors : Huaimo Chen
  Yan Zhuang
  Qin Wu
  Dhruv Dhody
  Daniele Ceccarelli
Filename: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling-00.txt
Pages   : 21
Date: 2017-06-30

Abstract:
   This document proposes a set of extensions needed to the stateful
   Path Computation Element (PCE) communication Protocol (PCEP), so as
   to enable Labeled Switched Path (LSP) scheduling for path computation
   and LSP setup/deletion based on the actual network resource usage
   duration of a traffic service in a centralized network environment as
   stated in [I.D.ietf-teas-scheduled-resources].


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling/

There are also htmlized versions available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling-00
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling-00


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce


Re: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-zhuang-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling-05

2017-06-30 Thread Jonathan Hardwick
This poll for adoption has concluded, with the result that the document will be 
adopted by the PCE working group.
Authors, please resubmit this version of the draft with the new name 
draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling-00.
Thanks
Jon


From: Jonathan Hardwick [mailto:jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com]
Sent: 16 June 2017 16:51
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: pce-cha...@ietf.org; draft-zhuang-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-schedul...@ietf.org
Subject: Poll for adoption: draft-zhuang-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling-05

All,

This is the start of a two week poll on making 
draft-zhuang-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling-05 a PCE working group document.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhuang-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling/


Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating "yes/support" 
or "no/do not support".  If indicating no, please state your reasons.  If yes, 
please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the 
document is a WG document.



The poll ends on Friday, June 30.



Many thanks,
Jon


___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce