[Pce] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-11: (with COMMENT)
Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-11: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp/ -- COMMENT: -- Thanks for considering my Discuss. Previous comments follow - I didn't check for these in the new version. In this text, The State Timeout Interval timer ensures that a PCE crash does not result in automatic and immediate disruption for the services using PCE-initiated LSPs. PCE-initiated LSPs are not removed immediately upon PCE failure. Instead, they are cleaned up on the expiration of this timer. This allows for network cleanup without manual intervention. The PCC SHOULD support removal of PCE-initiated LSPs as one of the behaviors applied on expiration of the State Timeout Interval timer. The behavior SHOULD be picked based on local policy, and can result either in LSP removal, or in reverting to operator- defined default parameters. I found myself wondering why “The PCC SHOULD support removal of PCE-initiated LSPs” is a SHOULD, and not a MUST, but if it’s a SHOULD, you might say something about the effects of not supporting this, in order to help implementers make an informed decision about whether to support it. In the same text, I found myself wondering if there were other alternatives to local policy for the last SHOULD, which is, of course, the last stop on the way to asking why this isn’t a MUST … ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
[Pce] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-11.txt
This version addresses the feedback we received from the IESG. If anyone has any concerns with the changes, please shout ASAP. Best regards Jon -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-dra...@ietf.org Sent: 09 October 2017 08:27 To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-11.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element WG of the IETF. Title : PCEP Extensions for PCE-initiated LSP Setup in a Stateful PCE Model Authors : Edward Crabbe Ina Minei Siva Sivabalan Robert Varga Filename: draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-11.txt Pages : 19 Date: 2017-10-07 Abstract: The Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) provides mechanisms for Path Computation Elements (PCEs) to perform path computations in response to Path Computation Clients (PCCs) requests. The extensions for stateful PCE provide active control of Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths (TE LSP) via PCEP, for a model where the PCC delegates control over one or more locally configured LSPs to the PCE. This document describes the creation and deletion of PCE-initiated LSPs under the stateful PCE model. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp/ There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-11 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-11 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-11 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
[Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-11.txt
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element WG of the IETF. Title : PCEP Extensions for PCE-initiated LSP Setup in a Stateful PCE Model Authors : Edward Crabbe Ina Minei Siva Sivabalan Robert Varga Filename: draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-11.txt Pages : 19 Date: 2017-10-07 Abstract: The Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) provides mechanisms for Path Computation Elements (PCEs) to perform path computations in response to Path Computation Clients (PCCs) requests. The extensions for stateful PCE provide active control of Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths (TE LSP) via PCEP, for a model where the PCC delegates control over one or more locally configured LSPs to the PCE. This document describes the creation and deletion of PCE-initiated LSPs under the stateful PCE model. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp/ There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-11 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-11 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-11 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
