Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-wang-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-01

[li zhenqiang]

Yes, support.

The requirement language in this doc SHOULD be capitalized.


li_zhenqi...@hotmail.com

发件人: Jonathan Hardwick 
[mailto:Jonathan.Hardwick=40metaswitch@dmarc.ietf.org]
发送时间: 2018年6月4日 18:11
收件人: pce@ietf.org; draft-wang-pce-pcep-extension-native...@ietf.org
抄送: pce-cha...@ietf.org
主题: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-wang-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-01

Hi PCE WG!

This is the start of a two week poll on making 
draft-wang-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-01 a PCE working group document.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip/

Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating “yes/support” 
or “no/do not support”.  If indicating no, please state your reasons.  If yes, 
please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the 
document is a WG document.

The poll ends on Monday, June 18.

Many thanks,

Jon and Julien
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-wang-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-01

[Zhuangshunwan]

Yes/support.

BR,
Shunwan


发件人: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Jonathan Hardwick
发送时间: 2018年6月4日 18:11
收件人: pce@ietf.org; draft-wang-pce-pcep-extension-native...@ietf.org
抄送: pce-cha...@ietf.org
主题: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-wang-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-01

Hi PCE WG!

This is the start of a two week poll on making 
draft-wang-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-01 a PCE working group document.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip/

Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating “yes/support” 
or “no/do not support”.  If indicating no, please state your reasons.  If yes, 
please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the 
document is a WG document.

The poll ends on Monday, June 18.

Many thanks,

Jon and Julien


___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-wang-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-01

[Khasanov Boris]

Yes, support (as co-author).

SY,
Boris

From: Jonathan Hardwick [mailto:jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com]
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 1:11 PM
To: pce@ietf.org; draft-wang-pce-pcep-extension-native...@ietf.org
Cc: pce-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: WG adoption poll for draft-wang-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-01

Hi PCE WG!

This is the start of a two week poll on making 
draft-wang-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-01 a PCE working group document.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip/

Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating "yes/support" 
or "no/do not support".  If indicating no, please state your reasons.  If yes, 
please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the 
document is a WG document.

The poll ends on Monday, June 18.

Many thanks,

Jon and Julien


___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

[Pce] 答复: WG adoption poll for draft-wang-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-01

[Lizhenbin]

Yes/support.

BR, Zhenbin(Robin)



From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 6:11 AM
To: pce@ietf.org; draft-wang-pce-pcep-extension-native...@ietf.org
Cc: pce-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-wang-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-01

Hi PCE WG!

This is the start of a two week poll on making 
draft-wang-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-01 a PCE working group document.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip/

Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating “yes/support” 
or “no/do not support”.  If indicating no, please state your reasons.  If yes, 
please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the 
document is a WG document.

The poll ends on Monday, June 18.

Many thanks,

Jon and Julien


___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-wang-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-01

[Huaimo Chen]

Yes/support.

BR, Huaimo
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 6:11 AM
To: pce@ietf.org; draft-wang-pce-pcep-extension-native...@ietf.org
Cc: pce-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-wang-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-01

Hi PCE WG!

This is the start of a two week poll on making 
draft-wang-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-01 a PCE working group document.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip/

Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating "yes/support" 
or "no/do not support".  If indicating no, please state your reasons.  If yes, 
please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the 
document is a WG document.

The poll ends on Monday, June 18.

Many thanks,

Jon and Julien


___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

[Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-wang-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-01

[Jonathan Hardwick]

Hi PCE WG!

This is the start of a two week poll on making 
draft-wang-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-01 a PCE working group document.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip/

Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating "yes/support" 
or "no/do not support".  If indicating no, please state your reasons.  If yes, 
please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the 
document is a WG document.

The poll ends on Monday, June 18.

Many thanks,

Jon and Julien


___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

[Pce] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8231 (5376)

[RFC Errata System]

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8231,
"Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Stateful 
PCE".

--
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5376

--
Type: Technical
Reported by: Hari Krushna Kotni 

Section: 7.2

Original Text
-
In case of SRP-ID-number wrapping, the last
   SRP-ID-number before the wrapping MUST be explicitly acknowledged, to
   avoid a situation where SRP-ID-numbers remain unacknowledged after
   the wrap.  This means that the PCC may need to issue two PCUpd
   messages on detecting a wrap.

Corrected Text
--
In case of SRP-ID-number wrapping, the last
   SRP-ID-number before the wrapping MUST be explicitly acknowledged, to
   avoid a situation where SRP-ID-numbers remain unacknowledged after
   the wrap.  This means that the PCC may need to issue two PCRpt
   messages on detecting a wrap.

Notes
-
incase of srp id wrap, once PCC detects it, PCC needs to issue PCRpt message 
not PCUpd message.

Instructions:
-
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--
RFC8231 (draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-21)
--
Title   : Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) 
Extensions for Stateful PCE
Publication Date: September 2017
Author(s)   : E. Crabbe, I. Minei, J. Medved, R. Varga
Category: PROPOSED STANDARD
Source  : Path Computation Element
Area: Routing
Stream  : IETF
Verifying Party : IESG

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce