[Pce] IETF 103 PCE WG Minutes

[Dhruv Dhody]

Hi WG, 

The minutes of the PCE WG have been posted at - 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-103-pce/
Please respond if there is any correction to be made. 

Thanks (and Happy Diwali[1])
Dhruv

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diwali

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

[Pce] Fwd: PCE-BSID Question to the List

[Jeff Tantsura]

Dear PCE,

Following our presentation in Bangkok, 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/103/materials/slides-103-pce-23-binding-segment-00.pdf

The authors would like to ask the WG the following:


(1) Do we link the Binding SID to the PCEP SR capability? Currently we
can assign BSID for RSVP-TE LSP as well.

(2) Is WG happy with TE-PATH-BINDING TLV format?

0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Type | Length |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Binding Type (BT) | Binding Value |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
~ Binding Value (continued) (variable length) ~
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Figure 2: TE-PATH-BINDING TLV

(3) Is there a use case for binding value as “index” in SRGB/SRLB?

Thanks!

Cheers,
Jeff
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce