Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling

[Khuzema Pithewan]

I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in 
accordance with IETF IPRrules.

Khuzema

> On Dec 6, 2019, at 7:40 PM, Qin Wu  wrote:
> 
> I am not aware of any other IPR besides one that has already been disclosed 
> by Huaimo.
>  
> -Qin
> From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan 
> Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2019 12:12 PM
> To: Huaimo Chen ; Zhuangyan (Yan) 
> ; bill...@huawei.com ; 
> daniele.ceccare...@ericsson.com 
> Cc: pce@ietf.org 
> Subject: IPR Poll on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling
>  
> Hi Authors,
>  
> In preparation for Working Group last call on this draft, I'd like all
> authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance
> with IETF IPR rules.
>  
> Please respond (copying the mailing list) to say one of:
>  
> I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed
> in accordance with IETF IPR rules.
>  
> I am aware of IPR applicable to this draft, and it has already been
> disclosed to the IETF.
>  
> I am aware of IPR applicable to this draft, but that has not yet been
> disclosed to the IETF. I will work to ensure that it will be disclosed in a
> timely manner.
>  
> Thanks,
> - Hari
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] WG LC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling

[Qin Wu]

Support.

-Qin

From: Pce mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of 
julien.meu...@orange.com 
mailto:julien.meu...@orange.com>>
Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2019 11:47 AM
To: pce@ietf.org mailto:pce@ietf.org>>
Subject: [Pce] WG LC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling

Dear PCE WG,

This message starts a 2-week PCE WG Last Call for
draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling-10. Please review the
document and share your comments and/or interest using the PCE mailing
list by Thursday December 19.

Thanks,

Dhruv & Julien

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] Fw: IPR Poll on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling

[Qin Wu]

I am not aware of any other IPR besides one that has already been disclosed by 
Huaimo.

-Qin

From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan mailto:h...@netflix.com>>
Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2019 12:12 PM
To: Huaimo Chen mailto:huaimo.c...@futurewei.com>>; 
Zhuangyan (Yan) 
mailto:zhuangyan.zhu...@huawei.com>>; 
bill...@huawei.com 
mailto:bill...@huawei.com>>; 
daniele.ceccare...@ericsson.com 
mailto:daniele.ceccare...@ericsson.com>>
Cc: pce@ietf.org mailto:pce@ietf.org>>
Subject: IPR Poll on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling


Hi Authors,



In preparation for Working Group last call on this draft, I'd like all

authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance

with IETF IPR rules.



Please respond (copying the mailing list) to say one of:



I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed

in accordance with IETF IPR rules.



I am aware of IPR applicable to this draft, and it has already been

disclosed to the IETF.



I am aware of IPR applicable to this draft, but that has not yet been

disclosed to the IETF. I will work to ensure that it will be disclosed in a

timely manner.



Thanks,

- Hari
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] Fw: IPR Poll on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling

[Khuzema Pithewan]

I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed
in accordance with IETF IPRrules.

Khuzema


> --
> *From:* Hariharan Ananthakrishnan 
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 5, 2019 12:12 PM
> *To:* Huaimo Chen ; Zhuangyan (Yan) <
> zhuangyan.zhu...@huawei.com>; bill...@huawei.com ;
> daniele.ceccare...@ericsson.com 
> *Cc:* pce@ietf.org 
> *Subject:* IPR Poll on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling
>
>
> Hi Authors,
>
> In preparation for Working Group last call on this draft, I'd like all
> authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance
> with IETF IPR rules.
>
> Please respond (copying the mailing list) to say one of:
>
> I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed
> in accordance with IETF IPR rules.
>
> I am aware of IPR applicable to this draft, and it has already been
> disclosed to the IETF.
>
> I am aware of IPR applicable to this draft, but that has not yet been
> disclosed to the IETF. I will work to ensure that it will be disclosed in a
> timely manner.
>
> Thanks,
> - Hari
>
>
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

[Pce] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-flags-00

[Hariharan Ananthakrishnan via Datatracker]

Hariharan Ananthakrishnan has requested publication of 
draft-ietf-pce-stateful-flags-00 as Proposed Standard on behalf of the PCE 
working group.

Please verify the document's state at 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-flags/

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

[Pce] RFC 8664 on Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Segment Routing

[rfc-editor]

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.


RFC 8664

Title:  Path Computation Element Communication Protocol 
(PCEP) Extensions for Segment Routing 
Author: S. Sivabalan,
C. Filsfils,
J. Tantsura,
W. Henderickx,
J. Hardwick
Status: Standards Track
Stream: IETF
Date:   December 2019
Mailbox:ms...@cisco.com, 
cfils...@cisco.com, 
jefftant.i...@gmail.com,
wim.henderi...@nokia.com, 
jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com
Pages:  29
Updates:RFC 8408

I-D Tag:draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-16.txt

URL:https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8664

DOI:10.17487/RFC8664

Segment Routing (SR) enables any head-end node to select any path
without relying on a hop-by-hop signaling technique (e.g., LDP or
RSVP-TE). It depends only on "segments" that are advertised by
link-state Interior Gateway Protocols (IGPs). An SR path can be
derived from a variety of mechanisms, including an IGP Shortest Path
Tree (SPT), an explicit configuration, or a Path Computation Element
(PCE). This document specifies extensions to the Path Computation
Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) that allow a stateful PCE to
compute and initiate Traffic-Engineering (TE) paths, as well as a
Path Computation Client (PCC) to request a path subject to certain
constraints and optimization criteria in SR networks.

This document updates RFC 8408.

This document is a product of the Path Computation Element Working Group of the 
IETF.

This is now a Proposed Standard.

STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions
for improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the Official
Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the 
standardization state and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this 
memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling

[Toy, Mehmet]

  I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be
disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules.
Thanks
Mehmet


*From:* Hariharan Ananthakrishnan 
*Sent:* Thursday, December 5, 2019 12:12 PM
*To:* Huaimo Chen ; Zhuangyan (Yan) <
zhuangyan.zhu...@huawei.com>; bill...@huawei.com ;
daniele.ceccare...@ericsson.com 
*Cc:* pce@ietf.org 
*Subject:* IPR Poll on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling


Hi Authors,

In preparation for Working Group last call on this draft, I'd like all
authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance
with IETF IPR rules.

Please respond (copying the mailing list) to say one of:

I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed
in accordance with IETF IPR rules.

I am aware of IPR applicable to this draft, and it has already been
disclosed to the IETF.

I am aware of IPR applicable to this draft, but that has not yet been
disclosed to the IETF. I will work to ensure that it will be disclosed in a
timely manner.

Thanks,
- Hari
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] WG LC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling

[Huaimo Chen]

Support its publication.

Best Regards,
Huaimo as co-author

From: Pce  on behalf of julien.meu...@orange.com 

Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2019 11:47 AM
To: pce@ietf.org 
Subject: [Pce] WG LC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling

Dear PCE WG,

This message starts a 2-week PCE WG Last Call for
draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling-10. Please review the
document and share your comments and/or interest using the PCE mailing
list by Thursday December 19.

Thanks,

Dhruv & Julien


___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce