Hi Adrian,

Thank you for your comments.

We plan to discuss the PCEP-LS in the next meeting in a hope to make some 
progress on it. We can always move the TLV in question to this I-D from PCEP-LS 
if need be.

RFC5511 will be added.

Thank you!

Best regards,
Shuping


--------------------------------------------------
彭书萍 Peng Shuping
Mobile: +86-18210364128<tel:+86-18210364128>(优先)
Email: pengshup...@huawei.com<mailto:pengshup...@huawei.com>
发件人:Adrian Farrel <adr...@olddog.co.uk>
收件人:julien.meuric <julien.meu...@orange.com>;pce <pce@ietf.org>
时 间:2020-12-03 21:05:30
主 题:Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-sr-09?

Hello all,

I was a contributor to some of the earlier versions of this document and am 
listed as such (although I don't think I work for Juniper any more).

I think the document is in a good enough state for adoption.

Post-adoption there are some things that could benefit from work...

- I worry about having draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls referenced by section 5.4
  This use is normative, but draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls is only included as an
  informative reference. It is worrying because it is unclear at this stage 
whether
  the WG will choose to adopt that work.
- The document feels too long for a relatively small extension. However, a
  quick scan doesn't immediately identify sections to prune.
- A reference to RFC 5511 is needed to explain section 6.1

Best,
Adrian

-----Original Message-----
From: Pce < pce-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of 
julien.meu...@orange.com<mailto:julien.meu...@orange.com>
Sent: 26 November 2020 15:35
To: pce@ietf.org<mailto:pce@ietf.org>
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-sr-09?

Hi all,

PCECC extensions are progressing towards the IESG. It is time to share
your thoughts about draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-sr-09.
Do you believe the I-D is a right foundation for a PCE WG item? Please
use the PCE mailing list to express your comments, support or
disagreement, including applicable rationale, especially for the latter.

Thanks,

Dhruv & Julien



_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org<mailto:Pce@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Reply via email to