Reviewer: Gyan Mishra Review result: Not Ready This draft provides the Yang model for PCEP.
The Yang model should include all PCEP related extensions and which from reading the draft I see missing some major components that should be included detailed in this review. Minor issues: Normative and / or Informative References to the following drafts should be included as well as I see are missing in the PCEP Yang model itself: H-PCE https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8751 SR related content missing from Yang model PCEP Centralized Controller https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9050 SR PCE Extension https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8664 SR EPE https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9086 SR EXT https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9085 SRv6 PCE extension https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6/ SRv6 PGM https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8986 SRv6 SRH https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8754 SRv6 Compression https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression-02 Transport Network Modernization related GMPLS / MPLS-TP PCEP extension for GMPLS https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8282.html https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8779/ RSVP TE extension for Co routed LSP ( Enhanced RSVP-TE) Allows operators to use converged network to support both unidirectional LSP and co-routed on same MPLS data plane without changing the MPLS data plane as is with MPLS-TP. https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7551.html https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9059 MPLS-TP Co routed path https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6373 PCEP stateful coloring extension https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color _______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
