[Pce] Fwd: WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pceps-tls13-01
Hi all, This LC has ended. A few comments have been shared (thank you Stéphane). @Authors: please, resolve them. In the meantime, we'll proceed with RtgDir and SecDir review. Thanks, Julien Forwarded Message Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2023 11:09:38 +0200 From: Julien Meuric Dear PCE WG, This message starts a 2-week WG last call on draft-ietf-pce-pceps-tls13-01 [1]. Please, be express any comments you have about this document using the PCE mailing list. This WGLC will end on Wednesday 20th September 2023. Thanks, Julien -- [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-pceps-tls13/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Early Code Point Allocation for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-color
Hi WG, We received no objections and thus will be going ahead with the early allocation process. Thanks! Dhruv & Julien On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 10:25 PM Dhruv Dhody wrote: > Hi WG, > > We have received a request from the authors of draft-ietf-pce-pcep-color > for an early code point allocation for the following allocations listed > in Section 6 - > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-color-02.html#section-6 > > RFC 7120 requires the following criteria to proceed: > b. The format, semantics, processing, and other rules related to > handling the protocol entities defined by the code points > (henceforth called "specifications") must be adequately described > in an Internet-Draft. > > > c. The specifications of these code points must be stable; i.e., if > there is a change, implementations based on the earlier and later > specifications must be seamlessly interoperable. > > According to the chairs’ review the 7120 criteria are met; if you disagree > and believe that the draft does not meet these criteria or believe that > early allocation is not appropriate for any other reason, please send an > email to the PCE mailing list explaining why by September 21st. > > Thanks! > > Dhruv & Julien > > > > > ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
[Pce] The PCE WG has placed draft-chen-pce-bier in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
The PCE WG has placed draft-chen-pce-bier in state Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Dhruv Dhody) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-bier/ ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
[Pce] WG Adoption of draft-chen-pce-bier-11
Hi WG, This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-chen-pce-bier-11. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-bier/ Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list. Please respond by Monday 9th Oct 2023. Please be more vocal during WG polls! Thanks! Dhruv & Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
[Pce] IPR poll for draft-chen-pce-bier-11
Hi Authors, In preparation for WG adoption on this draft, we'd like all authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance with IETF IPR rules. Please respond (copying the mailing list) to say one of: - I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules. - I am aware of the IPR applicable to this draft, and it has already been disclosed to the IETF. - I am aware of IPR applicable to this draft, but that has not yet been disclosed to the IETF. I will work to ensure that it will be disclosed in a timely manner. Thanks, Andrew ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
