Re: [Pce] 转发: Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls

2024-04-15 Thread 韩柳燕
Hi all,



I support this work and adoption.



Best regards,

Liuyan Han







-邮件原件-发件人: Pce  代表 julien.meu...@orange.com发送时间: 
2024年4月5日 0:19收件人: pce@ietf.org主题: [Pce] Adoption Poll for 
draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-lsHi all,We have a long history around PCEP-LS. The 
rough consensus has been to progress it as experimental within the PCE WG, 
which makes more sense than an independent submission.As a result, do you 
support draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls-27 [1] to become a PCE WG document? Please 
share your feedback using the PCE mailing list, including your comments and 
especially your rationales in case you39re opposed.Thank you,Julien---[1] 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls/





___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce


Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls

2024-04-15 Thread Aijun Wang
Support for its forwarding.PCEP has almost all the corresponding parts of BGP to control the devices, implement and deploy the PCEP-LS can assist the simplification of SDN controller/PCE.Aijun WangChina TelecomOn Apr 13, 2024, at 00:34, daniele.i...@gmail.com wrote:Hi Julien, all, Adrian got the point. It would be an interesting experiment to see. And yes, the idea of PCEP-LS started from those cases where PCEP is there and BGP is not, hence I support (as author) the adoption of the draft. Cheers,Daniele   From: Pce  On Behalf Of Adrian FarrelSent: Thursday, April 4, 2024 7:17 PMTo: julien.meu...@orange.com; pce@ietf.orgSubject: Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls Thanks, Julien.   Once upon a time, I was quite skeptical about this idea, and unhappy to see it progress. But I have become used to the idea, and two things help me believe we should adopt this:   1. As an Experiment, this can be tried out and we can see how well it works. If it is nonsense, no harm done. The authors' willingness to proceed as Experimental is reassuring.   2. The applicability to optical networks (separate draft) is convincing because it is easier to believe that optical devices do not want to add BGP-LS to their code stack (even if it is only a couple of thpusand lines of code).   So, I support adoption and commit to working with the authors to improve the draft.   I think the current description of the Experiment is pretty good, but work will be needed to sort out the IANA stuff. I just posted a draft to help with Experimental Error-Types.   Best, Adrian On 04/04/2024 18:18 CEST julien.meu...@orange.com wrote:     Hi all,   We have a long history around PCEP-LS. The rough consensus has been to progress it as experimental within the PCE WG, which makes more sense than an independent submission. As a result, do you support draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls-27 [1] to become a PCE WG document? Please share your feedback using the PCE mailing list, including your comments and especially your rationales in case you're opposed.   Thank you,   Julien   --- [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls/   ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ___Pce mailing listPce@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce


[Pce] Fwd: IPR poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls

2024-04-15 Thread julien . meuric

Forwarding to the list.



-- Original Message --
From: "Sivabalan, Siva" 
Date: 15/04/2024 01:07 BST
Subject: RE: [**EXTERNAL**] FW: [Pce] IPR poll for 
draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls


I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be 
disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules.


Thanks,

Siva



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce