Hi all, I support the WG adoption of the draft. This work started long time ago. Currently there is the real requirement to export information in the scenario related with IP + optical. They prefers PCEP other than BGP.
Best Regards, Zhenbin (Robin) ________________________________ 李振斌 Li Zhenbin Mobile: +86-13651017745/+968-91797068 Email: lizhen...@huawei.com 发件人：julien.meuric <julien.meu...@orange.com<mailto:julien.meu...@orange.com>> 收件人：pce <pce@ietf.org<mailto:pce@ietf.org>> 时 间：2024-04-04 18:20:29 主 题：[Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls Hi all, We have a long history around PCEP-LS. The rough consensus has been to progress it as experimental within the PCE WG, which makes more sense than an independent submission. As a result, do you support draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls-27 [1] to become a PCE WG document? Please share your feedback using the PCE mailing list, including your comments and especially your rationales in case you're opposed. Thank you, Julien --- [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls/
_______________________________________________ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
