Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls

[Lizhenbin]

Hi all,
I support the WG adoption of the draft. This work started long time ago. 
Currently there is the real requirement to export information in the scenario 
related with IP + optical. They prefers PCEP other than BGP.


Best Regards,
Zhenbin (Robin)





李振斌 Li Zhenbin
Mobile: +86-13651017745/+968-91797068
Email: lizhen...@huawei.com

发件人：julien.meuric mailto:julien.meu...@orange.com>>
收件人：pce mailto:pce@ietf.org>>
时 间：2024-04-04 18:20:29
主 题：[Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls

Hi all,

We have a long history around PCEP-LS. The rough consensus has been to
progress it as experimental within the PCE WG, which makes more sense
than an independent submission.
As a result, do you support draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls-27 [1] to become
a PCE WG document? Please share your feedback using the PCE mailing
list, including your comments and especially your rationales in case
you're opposed.

Thank you,

Julien

---
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls/

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-srv6

[Lizhenbin]

Hi All,
I support the adoption of the draft as the co-author.

Best Regards,
Zhenbin (Robin)





李振斌 Li Zhenbin
Mobile: +86-13651017745/+968-91797068
Email: lizhen...@huawei.com

发件人：julien.meuric 
收件人：pce 
时 间：2023-01-17 02:02:13
主 题：[Pce] WG Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-srv6

Hi all,

This e-mail starts an adoption poll for
draft-dhody-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-srv6-10 [1]. Do you
consider this I-D is ready to become a PCE WG item?

Please respond to the PCE list, including rationale if you believe the
WG should not adopt it.

Thanks,

Julien


[1]
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-srv6/


___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-dhody-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-srv6

[Lizhenbin]

Hi All,



I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in 
accordance with IETF IPR rules.



Best Regards,
Zhenbin (Robin)






李振斌 Li Zhenbin
Mobile: +86-13651017745/+968-91797068
Email: lizhen...@huawei.com

发件人：Gengxuesong (Geng Xuesong) 
收件人：Hariharan Ananthakrishnan ;Pengshuping (Peng Shuping) 
;Mahend Negi ;Lizhenbin 

抄 送：pce 
时 间：2023-01-17 17:15:13
主 题：RE: IPR Poll on draft-dhody-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-srv6

Hi WG,

I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in 
accordance with IETF IPR rules.

Best
Xuesong

From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan [mailto:h...@netflix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2023 12:23 PM
To: Pengshuping (Peng Shuping) ; Gengxuesong (Geng 
Xuesong) ; Mahend Negi ; 
Lizhenbin 
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject: IPR Poll on draft-dhody-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-srv6


Hi Authors,

In preparation for WG adoption on this draft, I'd like all

authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance

with IETF IPR rules.

Please respond (copying the mailing list) to say one of:

I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed

in accordance with IETF IPR rules.



I am aware of the IPR applicable to this draft, and it has already been

disclosed to the IETF.



I am aware of IPR applicable to this draft, but that has not yet been

disclosed to the IETF. I will work to ensure that it will be disclosed in a

timely manner.



Thanks,

- Hari
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit-06

[Lizhenbin]

Hi All,
I support the adoption.

Best Regards,
Zhenbin (Robin)






李振斌 Li Zhenbin
Mobile: +86-13651017745/+968-91797068
Email: lizhen...@huawei.com

发件人：Dhruv Dhody 
收件人：pce 
抄 送：draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit 
时 间：2022-06-24 17:00:57
主 题：[Pce] WG Adoption of draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit-06

Hi WG,

This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit-06.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit/

Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / 
Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to 
work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list.

Please respond by Monday 11th July 2022.

Please be more vocal during WG polls!

Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-l2-flowspec

[Lizhenbin]

Hi Hari,
I am aware of the IPR applicable to this draft and it has already been 
disclosed to the IETF.

Best Regards,
Zhenbin (Robin)




From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hariharan Ananthakrishnan
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2021 2:24 AM
To: Farrel Adrian ; Dhruv Dhody ; 
Lizhenbin 
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] IPR Poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-l2-flowspec


Hi Authors,

In preparation for WG adoption on this draft, I'd like all

authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance

with IETF IPR rules.

Please respond (copying the mailing list) to say one of:

I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed

in accordance with IETF IPR rules.



I am aware of the IPR applicable to this draft, and it has already been

disclosed to the IETF.



I am aware of IPR applicable to this draft, but that has not yet been

disclosed to the IETF. I will work to ensure that it will be disclosed in a

timely manner.



Thanks,

- Hari
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-sr-09

[Lizhenbin]

Hi Hari,

I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in 
accordance with IETF IPR rules.


Best regards,
Zhenbin (Robin)



From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan [mailto:h...@netflix.com]
Sent: Friday, November 27, 2020 6:58 AM
To: Lizhenbin mailto:lizhen...@huawei.com>>; Pengshuping 
(Peng Shuping) mailto:pengshup...@huawei.com>>; Mahend 
Negi mailto:mahend.i...@gmail.com>>; 
qz...@ethericnetworks.com<mailto:qz...@ethericnetworks.com>; 
chaozhou...@yahoo.com<mailto:chaozhou...@yahoo.com>
Cc: pce@ietf.org<mailto:pce@ietf.org>
Subject: IPR Poll on draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-sr-09


Hi Authors,



In preparation for WG adoption on this draft, I'd like all

authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance

with IETF IPR rules.

Please respond (copying the mailing list) to say one of:

I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed

in accordance with IETF IPR rules.



I am aware of the IPR applicable to this draft, and it has already been

disclosed to the IETF.



I am aware of IPR applicable to this draft, but that has not yet been

disclosed to the IETF. I will work to ensure that it will be disclosed in a

timely manner.



Thanks,

- Hari
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] The PCE WG has placed draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-sr in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

[Lizhenbin]

Hi All,
I support the adoption of the draft as the co-author.

Best Regards,
Zhenbin (Robin)



duzongp...@foxmail.com & 
duzongp...@chinamobile.com

From: IETF Secretariat
Date: 2020-11-26 23:54
To: 
draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller...@ietf.org;
 pce-cha...@ietf.org; 
pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] The PCE WG has placed 
draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-sr in state "Call For Adoption By 
WG Issued"

The PCE WG has placed draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-sr in state
Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Julien Meuric)

The document is available at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-sr/


___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-association-policy

[Lizhenbin]

I support the last call.


Best Regards,

Zhenbin (Robin)

--
李振斌 Li Zhenbin
Mobile: +86-13651017745/+968-91797068
Email: lizhen...@huawei.com

发件人：Dhruv Dhody 
收件人：pce 
抄 送：draft-ietf-pce-association-policy 
;pce-chairs 
时 间：2020-09-04 13:14:26
主 题：[Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-association-policy

Hi WG,

This email starts a working group last call for
draft-ietf-pce-association-policy [1].  Please indicate your support
or concern for this draft. If you are opposed to the progression of
the draft to RFC, please articulate your concern. If you support it,
please indicate that you have read the latest version and it is ready
for publication in your opinion. As always, review comments and nits
are most welcome.

The WG LC will end on 21st September 2020.

Thanks,
Dhruv & Julien
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-association-policy/

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller

[Lizhenbin]

I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in 
accordance with IETF IPR rules.


Best regards,

Zhenbin (Robin)





--
李振斌 Li Zhenbin
Mobile: +86-13651017745/+968-91797068
Email: lizhen...@huawei.com<mailto:lizhen...@huawei.com>

发件人：Pengshuping (Peng Shuping) 
收件人：Hariharan Ananthakrishnan ;Lizhenbin 
;Mahend Negi ;Quintin Zhao 
;chao.zhou 
抄 送：pce 
时 间：2020-08-17 18:37:45
主 题：RE: IPR Poll on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller

I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed
in accordance with IETF IPR rules.

Best regards,
Shuping



From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan [mailto:h...@netflix.com]
Sent: Friday, August 7, 2020 12:02 PM
To: Lizhenbin ; Pengshuping (Peng Shuping) 
; Mahend Negi ; 
qz...@ethericnetworks.com; chao.z...@cisco.com
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject: IPR Poll on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller


Hi Authors,



In preparation for WG LC on this draft, I'd like all

authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance

with IETF IPR rules.



Please respond (copying the mailing list) to say one of:



I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed

in accordance with IETF IPR rules.



I am aware of the IPR applicable to this draft, and it has already been

disclosed to the IETF.



I am aware of IPR applicable to this draft, but that has not yet been

disclosed to the IETF. I will work to ensure that it will be disclosed in a

timely manner.



Thanks,

- Hari
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

[Pce] 答复: PCE WG LC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller

[Lizhenbin]

Hi All,
I support the WG LC of the draft as the co-author. After years of work, the 
solution is mature and the draft is well written.

Best Regards,
Zhenbin (Robin)


From: julien.meu...@orange.com
Date: 2020-08-06 00:18
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] PCE WG LC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller
Hi all,

This message initiates a 3-week WG Last Call on
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-06. Please review and
share your feedback, whatever it is, using the PCE mailing list.
This LC will end on Wednesday August 26, 11:59pm (any timezone).

Please note that this I-D is related to
draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-sr which is already in our
WG adoption queue.

Thanks,

Dhruv & Julien


_

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments..
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06

[Lizhenbin]

I am not aware of any IPR except the disclosed one.

Best Regards,
Zhenbin(Robin)

--
李振斌 Li Zhenbin
Mobile: +86-13651017745/+968-91797068
Email: lizhen...@huawei.com<mailto:lizhen...@huawei.com>

发件人：Rakesh Gandhi 
收件人：Hariharan Ananthakrishnan 
抄 送：Chengli (Cheng Li) ;Mach Chen 
;Weiqiang Cheng ;Lizhenbin 
;Dongjie (Jimmy) ;Rakesh Gandhi 
;xiong.quan ;pce 
时 间：2020-01-24 04:57:00
主 题：Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06

Hi Hari,
I am aware of an IPR applicable to this draft, and it has already been 
disclosed to the IETF.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3978/

Thanks,
Rakesh


On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 1:32 PM Hariharan Ananthakrishnan 
mailto:40netflix@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:

Hi Authors,

In preparation for Working Group adoption on this draft, I'd like all
authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance
with IETF IPR rules.

Please respond (copying the mailing list) to say one of:

I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed
in accordance with IETF IPR rules.

I am aware of IPR applicable to this draft, and it has already been
disclosed to the IETF.

I am aware of IPR applicable to this draft, but that has not yet been
disclosed to the IETF. I will work to ensure that it will be disclosed in a
timely manner.

Thanks,
- Hari

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org<mailto:Pce@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06?

[Lizhenbin]

Hi WG,

I support the adoption of this document.

Best regards,
Zhenbin (Robin)

--
李振斌 Li Zhenbin
Mobile: +86-13651017745/+968-91797068
Email: lizhen...@huawei.com

发件人：Zafar Ali (zali) 
收件人：julien.meuric ;pce 
时 间：2020-01-24 20:45:25
主 题：Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06?

Support!

Thanks

Regards … Zafar

From: Pce  on behalf of "julien.meu...@orange.com" 

Organization: Orange
Date: Friday, January 17, 2020 at 5:13 AM
To: "pce@ietf.org" 
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06?

Hi all,

It is time to share your thoughts about draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06.
Do you believe the I-D is a right foundation for a PCE WG item? Please
use the PCE mailing list to express your comments, support or
disagreement, including applicable rationale, especially for the latter.

Thanks,

Dhruv & Julien



___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] WG LC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling

[Lizhenbin]

Support its publication.

Best Regards,
Zhenbin (Robin)


--
李振斌 Li Zhenbin
Mobile: +86-13651017745/+968-91797068
Email: lizhen...@huawei.com
发件人：julien.meuric 
收件人：pce 
时 间：2019-12-06 00:48:04
主题[Pce] WG LC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling

Dear PCE WG,

This message starts a 2-week PCE WG Last Call for
draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling-10. Please review the
document and share your comments and/or interest using the PCE mailing
list by Thursday December 19.

Thanks,

Dhruv & Julien


___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-flowspec

[Lizhenbin]

Hi Hari,

I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in 
accordance with IETF IPR rules.

Best Regards,
Zhenbin (Robin)


--
李振斌 Li Zhenbin
Mobile: +86-13651017745/+968-91797068
Email: lizhen...@huawei.com<mailto:lizhen...@huawei.com>
发件人：Dhruv Dhody 
收件人：Hariharan Ananthakrishnan 
抄 送：Farrel Adrian ;Lizhenbin ;pce 

时 间：2019-10-15 11:42:33
主题Re: IPR Poll on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-flowspec

Hi Hari,

I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be
disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules.

Thanks!
Dhruv

On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 10:30 PM Hariharan Ananthakrishnan
 wrote:
>
> Hi Authors,
>
> In preparation for Working Group last call on this draft, I'd like all
> authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance
> with IETF IPR rules.
>
> Please respond (copying the mailing list) to say one of:
>
> I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed
> in accordance with IETF IPR rules.
>
> I am aware of IPR applicable to this draft, and it has already been
> disclosed to the IETF.
>
> I am aware of IPR applicable to this draft, but that has not yet been
> disclosed to the IETF. I will work to ensure that it will be disclosed in a
> timely manner.
>
> Thanks,
> - Hari
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment?

[Lizhenbin]

Hi WG,

Support as the co-author. Path Segment is the base for many usecases based on 
SR such as OAM, bi-directional, etc. It has been well accepted. 
PCE extensions will facilitate the deployment of Path Segment and the draft is 
ready.


Best Regards,
Zhenbin (Robin)





-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of julien.meu...@orange.com
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 12:21 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment?

Hi PCE WG,

In our adoption poll queue, draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment has been there for a 
little while, after it was discussed face to face. We would now like you to 
voice your opinion on the list: do you think this I-D can be the foundation for 
a PCE WG's work item?

Please send your feedback to the PCE mailing list, including any comment you 
would like to share, especially if you think the WG should not adopt it. This 
poll will end on October 9.

Thanks,

Dhruv & Julien


_

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites 
ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez 
le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les 
messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute 
responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used 
or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment-08

[Lizhenbin]

Hi Hari and WG,

I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed
in accordance with IETF IPR rules.

Best Regards,
Zhenbin (Robin)




From: Weiqiang Cheng [mailto:chengweiqi...@chinamobile.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 10:07 AM
To: Chengli (Cheng Li) ; 'Hariharan Ananthakrishnan' 
; Mach Chen ; Dongjie (Jimmy) 
; Lizhenbin ; rgan...@cisco.com; 
xiong.q...@zte.com.cn
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject: 答复: IPR Poll on draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment-08

Hi,
I am not aware of any IPR applicable to the draft.

B.R.
Weiqiang Cheng

发件人: Chengli (Cheng Li) [mailto:chengl...@huawei.com]
发送时间: 2019年9月26日 09:50
收件人: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan; Mach Chen; 
chengweiqi...@chinamobile.com<mailto:chengweiqi...@chinamobile.com>; Dongjie 
(Jimmy); Lizhenbin; rgan...@cisco.com<mailto:rgan...@cisco.com>; 
xiong.q...@zte.com.cn<mailto:xiong.q...@zte.com.cn>
抄送: pce@ietf.org<mailto:pce@ietf.org>
主题: RE: IPR Poll on draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment-08

Hi Hari and WG,

I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed
in accordance with IETF IPR rules.

Cheng


From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan [mailto:h...@netflix.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 1:49 AM
To: Chengli (Cheng Li) mailto:chengl...@huawei.com>>; 
Mach Chen mailto:mach.c...@huawei.com>>; 
chengweiqi...@chinamobile.com<mailto:chengweiqi...@chinamobile.com>; Dongjie 
(Jimmy) mailto:jie.d...@huawei.com>>; Lizhenbin 
mailto:lizhen...@huawei.com>>; 
rgan...@cisco.com<mailto:rgan...@cisco.com>; 
xiong.q...@zte.com.cn<mailto:xiong.q...@zte.com.cn>
Cc: pce@ietf.org<mailto:pce@ietf.org>
Subject: IPR Poll on draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment-08


Hi Authors,



In preparation for Working Group last call on this draft, I'd like all

authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance

with IETF IPR rules.



Please respond (copying the mailing list) to say one of:



I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed

in accordance with IETF IPR rules.



I am aware of IPR applicable to this draft, and it has already been

disclosed to the IETF.



I am aware of IPR applicable to this draft, but that has not yet been

disclosed to the IETF. I will work to ensure that it will be disclosed in a

timely manner.



Thanks,

- Hari
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] Adrian stepping down as PCE co-chair

[Lizhenbin]

Many thanks to Adrian. Thanks for your effort to guarantee the smooth 
transition.

Best Regards,
Zhenbin (Robin)



From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2019 4:14 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: pce-chairs 
Subject: [Pce] Adrian stepping down as PCE co-chair

Hi,

As we noted earlier, Adrian stepped in to help us with the PCE document queue 
and help bring Dhruv on as a new chair. He has done a fantastic job and Dhruv 
and Julien are now ready to go forward.

We very much appreciate his support and thank him for all his help!

Deborah

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] WG Adoption Call for draft-negi-pce-segment-routing-ipv6

[Lizhenbin]

I support the adoption of the draft. It is important for the dynamic SRv6 TE 
with central control. 


Best Regards,
Zhenbin (Robin)




-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2019 2:47 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG Adoption Call for draft-negi-pce-segment-routing-ipv6

Hi WG,

Please read & review draft-negi-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-04 [1] and send your 
comments to the mailing list.

Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons
- Why / why not?

What needs to be fixed before or after adoption?

Are you willing to work on this draft? Do you plan to implement it?

This poll will run until 8th March.

Thanks,
PCE Chairs

[1] 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-negi-pce-segment-routing-ipv6/?include_text=1

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-08

[Lizhenbin]

Yes/support as the co-author.

Best Regards,
Zhenbin(Robin)


From: Jonathan Hardwick [mailto:jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2018 10:47 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-control...@ietf.org; 
pce-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: WG adoption poll for 
draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-08

This is the start of a two week poll on making 
draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-08 a PCE working group 
document.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller/

Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating "yes/support" 
or "no/do not support".  If indicating no, please state your reasons.  If yes, 
please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the 
document is a WG document.

The poll ends on Friday, October 26.

Many thanks,

Jon and Julien

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

[Pce] 答复: WG adoption poll for draft-wang-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-01

[Lizhenbin]

Yes/support.

BR, Zhenbin(Robin)



From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2018 6:11 AM
To: pce@ietf.org; draft-wang-pce-pcep-extension-native...@ietf.org
Cc: pce-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-wang-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-01

Hi PCE WG!

This is the start of a two week poll on making 
draft-wang-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-01 a PCE working group document.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip/

Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating “yes/support” 
or “no/do not support”.  If indicating no, please state your reasons.  If yes, 
please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the 
document is a WG document.

The poll ends on Monday, June 18.

Many thanks,

Jon and Julien


___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

[Pce] 答复: WG adoption poll for draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection-05

[Lizhenbin]

Yes/support.


From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 13:10
To: pce@ietf.org; 
draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protect...@ietf.org
Cc: pce-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG adoption poll for 
draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection-05

Dear PCE WG

This is the start of a two week poll on making 
draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection-05 a PCE working group 
document.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection/

Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating “yes/support” 
or “no/do not support”.  If indicating no, please state your reasons.  If yes, 
please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the 
document is a WG document.

The poll ends on Tuesday, April 10.

Many thanks,

Jon and Julien



_



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.



This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

[Pce] 答复: WG adoption poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-flowspec-03

[Lizhenbin]

yes/support (as the co-author).

Best Regards,
Zhenbin(Robin)


发件人: Jonathan Hardwick [mailto:jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com]
发送时间: 2018年2月20日 21:34
收件人: pce@ietf.org
抄送: pce-cha...@ietf.org; draft-li-pce-pcep-flows...@ietf.org
主题: WG adoption poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-flowspec-03

Dear PCE WG

This is the start of a two week poll on making draft-li-pce-pcep-flowspec-03 a 
PCE working group document.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-pce-pcep-flowspec/

Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating “yes/support” 
or “no/do not support”.  If indicating no, please state your reasons.  If yes, 
please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the 
document is a WG document.

The poll ends on Tuesday, March 6.

Many thanks,

Jon and Julien

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

[Pce] 答复: WG LC of draft-ietf-pce-association-group

[Lizhenbin]

Support.

Best Regards,
Zhenbin (Robin)



-邮件原件-
发件人: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Julien Meuric
发送时间: 2018年2月1日 22:10
收件人: pce@ietf.org
主题: [Pce] WG LC of draft-ietf-pce-association-group

Hi all,

This message initiates a 2-week WG last call for 
draft-ietf-pce-association-group-04. Please review and share your feedback on 
the PCE mailing list. This LC will end on Thursday February, 15.

Regards,

Jon & Julien

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

[Pce] 答复: Poll for adoption: draft-dhody-pce-applicability-actn-02

[Lizhenbin]

yes/support.

Best Regards,
Zhenbin(Robin)




发件人: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Jonathan Hardwick
发送时间: 2017年4月26日 0:26
收件人: pce@ietf.org
抄送: 
draft-dhody-pce-applicability-a...@ietf.org;
 pce-cha...@ietf.org
主题: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-dhody-pce-applicability-actn-02

All,

This is the start of a two week poll on making 
draft-dhody-pce-applicability-actn-02 a PCE working group document.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-applicability-actn/


Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating “yes/support” 
or “no/do not support”.  If indicating no, please state your reasons.  If yes, 
please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the 
document is a WG document.



The poll ends on Tuesday, May 9.



Many thanks,
Jon


___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

[Pce] 答复: Poll for adoption: draft-dhody-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints-03

[Lizhenbin]

Yes/support.

Best Regards,
Zhenbin(Robin)



发件人: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Jonathan Hardwick
发送时间: 2017年4月10日 18:39
收件人: pce@ietf.org
抄送: pce-cha...@ietf.org; 
draft-dhody-pce-pcep-exp-codepoi...@ietf.org
主题: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-dhody-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints-03

All,

This is the start of a two week poll on making 
draft-dhody-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints-03 a PCE working group document.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-pcep-exp-codepoints/


Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating “yes/support” 
or “no/do not support”.  If indicating no, please state your reasons.  If yes, 
please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the 
document is a WG document.



The poll ends on Monday, April 24.



Many thanks,
Jon

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

[Pce] Solicit Comments on draft-li-spring-tunnel-segment-00 and draft-li-pce-tunnel-segment-00

[Lizhenbin]

Hi Folks,

We proposes two drafts on the new type of segment in the segment routing: 
draft-li-spring-tunnel-segment-00 and draft-li-pce-tunnel-segment-00.

-- draft-li-spring-tunnel-segment-00 proposes the possible usecases such as 
reduce SID stack depth of SR path, span the non-SR domain or provide 
differentiated services. This document also proposes the difference between the 
adjacency segment and the tunnel segment. These work will help to understand 
the necessity and advantages of tunnel segment in some application scenarios. 
Then we define the forwarding mechanism and protocol extensions requirements on 
tunnel segment.

-- draft-li-pce-tunnel-segment-00 proposes the possbile PCEP protocol 
extensions for the tunnel segment based on draft-li-spring-tunnel-segment-00. 
The protocol extensions are introduced for two different applications: 1. PCEP 
extensiosn from PCC to PCE; 2. PCEP extensions from PCE to PCC.



Hope you could have interest in these drafts, help review or refine. You 
comments will be appreciated.







Thanks & Regards,

Zhenbin (Robin)
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

[Pce] 答复: [Idr] New draft - Flowspec Path Redirect

[Lizhenbin]

Hi Gunter and Robert,
We are also doing similar work. Regarding the draft, the major concern is as 
follows:
1. What does the PATH_ID represent? Does it mean only tunnel/LSP or all 
possible forwarding path including tunnel/LSP, interface, VRF, nexthop, etc?
2. How to allocate the PATH_ID for the forwarding path?
We think the forwarding behavior for Flowspec is always actual forwarding 
concepts including VRF, nexthop, etc. So we proposed ‘redirect to tunnel’ in 
similar way. But for PATH_ID you proposed is another way to generalize all 
possible forwarding path. It may be a new way to define forwarding behavior for 
BGP Flowspec.

Regarding redirecting tunnel, we proposed several drafts for your reference:
-- draft-hao-idr-flowspec-nvo3-00
-- draft-li-idr-mpls-path-programming-01
-- draft-li-spring-tunnel-segment-00
-- draft-chen-pce-pce-initiated-ip-tunnel-00
-- draft-li-pce-tunnel-segment-00

As Weiguo mentioned, the "redirect to Tunnel" for BGP Flowspec has been 
described briefly in draft-hao-idr-flowspec-nvo3-00. We will split it into two 
drafts: 1. draft-hao-idr-flowspec-nvo3-01; 2. one independent draft to define 
the "redirect to tunnel" for BGP Flowspec.

For "redirect to tunnel" for BGP flowspec, in fact there can be two types of 
such behaviors:
1. Specify the tunnel type:
For this behavior, we will reuse the IP tunnel types defined in 
[draft-rosen-idr-tunnel-encaps-00] and the MPLS tunnel types defined in 
[draft-li-idr-mpls-path-programming-01].
2. Specify the specific tunnel:
For MPLS TE tunnel, there can be multiple MPLS TE tunnels for a specific 
destination. The tunnel type may be not enough. Then it is necessary to specify 
the specific MPLS TE tunnel through Tunnel Identifier. [RFC3209] defined the 
Tunnel Identifier for MPLS TE tunnel. PCE-initiated LSP adopted the Tunnel 
Identifier for which tunnel ID can be allocated by PCE. 
[draft-li-idr-mpls-path-programming-01] will try to reuse the tunnel identifier 
and define it in the tunnel attribute which can be used for "redirect to 
tunnel" in [draft-hao-idr-flowspec-nvo3-00].
For IP tunnel, there is always only one IP forwarding path for a specific 
destination. So When define "redirect to specific IP tunnel" the nexthop plus 
the tunnel type may be enough in the existing deployment. As the development of 
IP tunnels, it may be popular to configure multiple IP tunnels for the specific 
destination. For examples we can define multiple MPLS-in-UDP tunnels for which 
the destination is same and the port number can be different for the purpose of 
ECMP. In order to cope with such development, 
[draft-chen-pce-pce-initiated-ip-tunnel-00] is proposed to introduce the tunnel 
identifier for IP tunnels for which tunnel ID can also be allocated by PCE as 
the MPLS TE tunnel. It may be also reused in the tunnel attributes for the 
"redirect to tunnel".

We think if it is only to think about "redirect to tunnel" for the BGP Flowspec 
there has already been much existing work and it is better to reuse them.

In fact the existing work to specify a specific tunnel the tunnel identifier is 
a combination with the ingress address/egress address and tunnel ID. But for 
the draft draft-vandevelde-idr-flowspec-path-redirect-00, PATH_ID can be only 
one value to represent one tunnel. Recently we proposed the drafts 
draft-li-spring-tunnel-segment-00/ draft-li-pce-tunnel-segment-00 in which the 
segment ID/label can be allocated for a tunnel. This is also to use one value 
to represent a tunnel. Now Segment Routing has defined many types segments 
which can map to different forwarding path such as interface, node, tunnel, 
etc. From my point of view, the work to define Segment-ID/Label and PATH-ID for 
the forwarding path can be consolidated and incorporated in the SRPING work. If 
we hope to define the generalized concept, maybe we can define “Redirect to 
Segment” for the BGP Flowspec. In [draft-li-idr-mpls-path-programming-01], we 
define the label combination attributes to map the service to the MPLS 
forwarding path. Maybe it can be enhanced to SID stack attribute to map to 
general forwarding path which can be used for multiple BGP address family 
including BGP Flowspec.

This is about our thinking on the "redirect to tunnel/path" work. Hope to get 
your opinion on it.


Best Regards,
Zhenbin(Robin)






发件人: Idr [mailto:idr-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Gunter Van De Velde
发送时间: 2015年9月23日 20:44
收件人: Robert Raszuk
抄送: i...@ietf.org; VAN DE VELDE, Gunter (Gunter)
主题: Re: [Idr] New draft - Flowspec Path Redirect


Interresting question... I see few options to address this. (And fwiw, i left 
this currently intentionally out the text to see if some ideas pop-up to 
confirm or deny the ideas the authors had on this topic)

The one which currently to me resonates most is to treat the path-id similar as 
a traditional bgp next-hop address... Meaning, that if the receiving router 
does't have a "valid" entry in the locallised path-id table it treats flowspec 
rul

[Pce] 答复: PCE WG Last Call on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-07

[Lizhenbin]

Support.

Regards,
Robin


-邮件原件-
发件人: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 julien.meu...@orange.com
发送时间: 2015年4月16日 0:43
收件人: pce@ietf.org
主题: [Pce] PCE WG Last Call on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-07

Dear PCE & TEAS WGs,

This message initiates a 2-week WG last call on 
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-domain-sequence-07. Please send your comments to the PCE 
mailing list by Wednesday April 29.

Thanks,

JP & Julien


_

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites 
ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez 
le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les 
messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute 
responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used 
or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce