Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-vendor
Hi all, I have read the document and find that the extension of Vendor Information Object and VENDOR-INFORMATION-TLV to Stateful PCE is useful for simplifying interoperability and experimental implementations. I support the WG adoption of the document. Tan -邮件原件- 发件人: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 julien.meu...@orange.com 发送时间: 2023年6月20日 15:47 收件人: pce@ietf.org 主题: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-vendor Hi all, It has been a while since draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-vendor started to document how to extend the scope of RFC 7470. It is now time to consider its adoption by the WG. Do you think draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-vendor-16 [1] is ready to become a PCE work item? Please express your support and/or concerns using the mailing list. Thanks, Dhruv & Julien [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-vendor Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20
Hi, Hari: I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules. Best Regards Ren Tan Huawei 发件人: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan [mailto:hariharan.i...@gmail.com] 发送时间: 2023年5月17日 11:16 收件人: wang...@chinatelecom.cn; bhassa...@yahoo.com; zhu.ch...@zte.com.cn; Fangsheng ; Tanren 抄送: pce@ietf.org 主题: IPR Poll on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-20 Hi Authors, In preparation for WG LC on this I-D, I'd like all authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance with IETF IPR rules. Please respond (copying the mailing list) to say one of: I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules. I am aware of the IPR applicable to this draft, and it has already been disclosed to the IETF. I am aware of IPR applicable to this draft, but that has not yet been disclosed to the IETF. I will work to ensure that it will be disclosed in a timely manner. Thanks, - Hari ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-srv6
Hi all, I have read the document and find PCECC for SRv6 is useful. I support the WG adoption of the document. Tan -邮件原件- 发件人: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 julien.meu...@orange.com 发送时间: 2023年1月17日 2:00 收件人: pce@ietf.org 主题: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-srv6 Hi all, This e-mail starts an adoption poll for draft-dhody-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-srv6-10 [1]. Do you consider this I-D is ready to become a PCE WG item? Please respond to the PCE list, including rationale if you believe the WG should not adopt it. Thanks, Julien [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dhody-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-srv6/ ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
