Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit-06
Hi WG, I support the adoption as a coauthor. Best, Yali From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:d...@dhruvdhody.com] Sent: Friday, June 24, 2022 4:59 PM To: pce@ietf.org Cc: draft-chen-pce-pcep-i...@ietf.org Subject: WG Adoption of draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit-06 Hi WG, This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit-06. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit/ Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list. Please respond by Monday 11th July 2022. Please be more vocal during WG polls! Thanks! Dhruv & Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] IPR Poll for draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit
Hi all, I am aware of the IPR applicable to this draft, and it has already been disclosed to the IETF. Thanks, Yali From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan [mailto:h...@netflix.com] Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2022 1:28 AM To: Tianran Zhou ; yuanh...@unionpay.com; Giuseppe Fioccola ; Liweidong (Poly) ; Wangyali(Yali Wang) Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: IPR Poll for draft-chen-pce-pcep-ifit Hi Authors, In preparation for WG adoption on this draft, I'd like all authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance with IETF IPR rules. Please respond (copying the mailing list) to say one of: I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules. I am aware of the IPR applicable to this draft, and it has already been disclosed to the IETF. I am aware of IPR applicable to this draft, but that has not yet been disclosed to the IETF. I will work to ensure that it will be disclosed in a timely manner. Thanks, - Hari ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05
Hi WG, I support the WG adoption for draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05, which provides extensions to PCEP for signaling multiple Segment-Lists of an SR Candidate-Path. Thanks, Yali From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:d...@dhruvdhody.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2021 10:52 PM To: pce@ietf.org Cc: draft-koldychev-pce-multip...@ietf.org Subject: WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05 Hi WG, This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05 Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list. Please respond by Wednesday 28th April. Thanks! Dhruv & Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-sr-09?
Hi WG, This draft extends the base PCECC for supporting configuration of the forwarding actions on the routers and SR SID allocation, which I believe it is useful. I support the WG adoption of this draft. Best, Yali -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of julien.meu...@orange.com Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2020 11:35 PM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-sr-09? Hi all, PCECC extensions are progressing towards the IESG. It is time to share your thoughts about draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-sr-09. Do you believe the I-D is a right foundation for a PCE WG item? Please use the PCE mailing list to express your comments, support or disagreement, including applicable rationale, especially for the latter. Thanks, Dhruv & Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
