Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color-02
Hi WG, The adoption call is concluded and we have a new WG I-D. Thanks to those who provided feedback and comments. Authors, Please post draft-ietf-pce-pcep-color-00 version with no other content change. Thanks! Dhruv & Julien PS. Happy Holidays & New Year :) ! On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 10:36 AM Dhruv Dhody wrote: > Hi WG, > > This email begins the WG adoption poll for > draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color-02. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color/ > > Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - > Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you > willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list. > > Please respond by Friday 16th Dec 2022. > > Please be more vocal during WG polls! > > Thanks! > Dhruv & Julien > ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color-02
Hi folks, I support the adoption of this draft. Best regards Chongfeng Original From: DhruvDhody To: pce@ietf.org ; Cc: draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-co...@ietf.org ; Date: 2022年12月01日 13:07 Subject: WG Adoption of draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color-02 Hi WG, This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color-02. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color/ Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list. Please respond by Friday 16th Dec 2022. Please be more vocal during WG polls! Thanks! Dhruv & Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color-02
I support the adoption. Service mapping using color associated with RSVP-TE tunnels is a very useful feature. Thanks, Chandra. From: Pce <mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Dhruv Dhody <mailto:d...@dhruvdhody.com> Date: Thursday, 1 December 2022 at 10:37 AM To: mailto:pce@ietf.org <mailto:pce@ietf.org> Cc: mailto:draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-co...@ietf.org <mailto:draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-co...@ietf.org> Subject: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color-02 [External Email. Be cautious of content] Hi WG, This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color-02. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color/ Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list. Please respond by Friday 16th Dec 2022. Please be more vocal during WG polls! Thanks! Dhruv & Julien Non-Juniper ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color-02
Support as a co-author, color is a useful term for TE purpose during PCEP signal, whether it is used in the traditional RSVP-TE tunnel or the current SR policy. Regards, PSF Original From: DhruvDhody To: pce@ietf.org ; Cc: draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-co...@ietf.org ; Date: 2022年12月01日 13:07 Subject: WG Adoption of draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color-02 Hi WG, This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color-02. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color/ Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list. Please respond by Friday 16th Dec 2022. Please be more vocal during WG polls! Thanks! Dhruv & Julien___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color-02
I support adoption of this draft. I think carrying Color for RSVP-TE tunnels in PCEP is an important and useful addition. One comment: It would be good to get the IANA code-points allotted, to facilitate implementations. Thanks, Kaliraj From: Pce on behalf of Dhruv Dhody Date: Thursday, 1 December 2022 at 10:37 AM To: pce@ietf.org Cc: draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-co...@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color-02 [External Email. Be cautious of content] Hi WG, This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color-02. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!GJBaGp0Btw53B5vKeYz_y2UIoikmpZYVDBdrUdebUi5G_RV1lMN8J_9q2DZ-E15Dko6tyPtYZTkqlSI$> Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list. Please respond by Friday 16th Dec 2022. Please be more vocal during WG polls! Thanks! Dhruv & Julien Juniper Business Use Only Juniper Business Use Only ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color-02
Hi WG, I support the adoption of this draft as a co-author. Color is useful to associate a TE tunnel or policy. It is reasonable to support the PCEP extensions for the path constraints and optimization objectives. Best Regards, Quan https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color/ https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color-02
As a co-author, I support the adoption of this draft. The signaling of color has many uses in PCE based traffic engineering. Thanks, Mike. From: Pce On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2022 12:07 AM To: pce@ietf.org Cc: draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-co...@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color-02 Hi WG, This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color-02. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color/ Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list. Please respond by Friday 16th Dec 2022. Please be more vocal during WG polls! Thanks! Dhruv & Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color-02
I support WG adoption by the PCE WG. SR Policy VPN service route color to intent mapping is an important aspect of Segment Routing to instantiate per flow or per destination steering and this draft provides a PCEP extension to carry the coloring inter domain. This is a very useful and important draft for operators migrating to segment routing. Thank you Gyan On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 12:07 AM Dhruv Dhody wrote: > Hi WG, > > This email begins the WG adoption poll for > draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color-02. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color/ > > Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - > Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you > willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list. > > Please respond by Friday 16th Dec 2022. > > Please be more vocal during WG polls! > > Thanks! > Dhruv & Julien > ___ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > -- <http://www.verizon.com/> *Gyan Mishra* *Network Solutions A**rchitect * *Email gyan.s.mis...@verizon.com * *M 301 502-1347* ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color-02
Hi, As a co-author, I support adoption of by the WG. As Pavan noted, there has been quite some interest around service mapping recently. I believe that the solution proposed in the draft fills a gap in PCEP interaction to complete the overall solution. Thanks, Balaji Rajagopalan From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram Date: Monday, 5 December 2022 at 2:15 PM To: Dhruv Dhody Cc: pce@ietf.org , draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-co...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color-02 [External Email. Be cautious of content] As a co-author, I would like to see the document get adopted by the WG. The use of "color" to associate a TE tunnel/policy with an intent has been widely discussed in other routing area WGs -- the PCEP extension proposed in this document to carry the "color" attribute is a useful addition to the service-mapping toolkit. As far as the authors are concerned, there are no open issues. Regards, -Pavan On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 10:37 AM Dhruv Dhody mailto:d...@dhruvdhody.com>> wrote: Hi WG, This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color-02. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!BLn0PHnInjB5lKgzKkgqYbZoh6W92p136-Z-lhieHPfxvN_WZePD5NphYeQMFTs-p6-SpjycFIqSkd1t334a$> Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list. Please respond by Friday 16th Dec 2022. Please be more vocal during WG polls! Thanks! Dhruv & Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org<mailto:Pce@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!BLn0PHnInjB5lKgzKkgqYbZoh6W92p136-Z-lhieHPfxvN_WZePD5NphYeQMFTs-p6-SpjycFIqSkWelPEuq$> Juniper Business Use Only ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color-02
As a co-author, I would like to see the document get adopted by the WG. The use of "color" to associate a TE tunnel/policy with an intent has been widely discussed in other routing area WGs -- the PCEP extension proposed in this document to carry the "color" attribute is a useful addition to the service-mapping toolkit. As far as the authors are concerned, there are no open issues. Regards, -Pavan On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 10:37 AM Dhruv Dhody wrote: > Hi WG, > > This email begins the WG adoption poll for > draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color-02. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color/ > > Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - > Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you > willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list. > > Please respond by Friday 16th Dec 2022. > > Please be more vocal during WG polls! > > Thanks! > Dhruv & Julien > ___ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color-02
From: Pce on behalf of Dhruv Dhody Sent: 01 December 2022 05:06 Hi WG, This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color-02. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color/ Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list. Please respond by Friday 16th Dec 2022. A problem with the IETF way of working is thrown up by this I-D. It adds a new error message to LSP-ERROR-CODE TLV Error Code Field a field which is modelled in pce-pcep-yang, an I-D which has just completed WG LC. This new message will render pcep-yang out-of-date. Technically this can be addressed by making the list of error messages an IANA-maintained YANG module which I think a bad idea since it is a process that has no end. The next addition to PCEP might be in the LS Capability flags which would require them to be an IANA-maintained module and so on and so forth. This I-D could contain a YANG module which augments pcep-yang which I think an even worse idea:-( There was a time, in the days of SMI, when many CCAMP registries were IANA-maintained but that seems to have fallen by the wayside, especially with TEAS which reinvented them in its I-Ds, close to but not quite the same as the IANA registries. So I see the problem but not a good solution. Tom Petch Please be more vocal during WG polls! Thanks! Dhruv & Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color-02
I have read the document and I think it should be adopted as WGdocument. The functionality proposed is of interest and the mechanism align well with other use cases. Thanks, Cyril On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 at 05:07, Dhruv Dhody wrote: > Hi WG, > > This email begins the WG adoption poll for > draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color-02. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color/ > > Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - > Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you > willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list. > > Please respond by Friday 16th Dec 2022. > > Please be more vocal during WG polls! > > Thanks! > Dhruv & Julien > ___ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
[Pce] WG Adoption of draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color-02
Hi WG, This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color-02. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rajagopalan-pce-pcep-color/ Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing to work on this draft? Review comments should be posted to the list. Please respond by Friday 16th Dec 2022. Please be more vocal during WG polls! Thanks! Dhruv & Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
