Re: [Pce] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing-08.txt
Hi All, I suggested to Haomian to describe the H-PCE(/ACTN) usecase as well where if child PCE does sticky resource [1] handling, the resources could be shared during path computation requests for various BN-In(i) to BN-Out(j) pairs (finaly Parent PCE would select only one of them). This would further highlight the applicability and usage of this feature. Thanks! Dhruv [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7399#section-13 On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 9:34 PM wrote: > > Hi again, > > Thank you Adrian for sharing your support on this I-D. We agree that no > one expressed disagreement on that work. It therefore leaves this I-D in > a draw situation: it missed an opportunity to get adopted, but there is > no reason to exclude another poll to distinguish between bad poll timing > and lack of support. > I suggest the authors to keep on working on the document, including the > list as much as possible and we will eventually consider a 2nd adoption > poll. > > Cheers, > > Julien > > > On 27/11/2018 21:35, Adrian Farrel wrote: > > Hi Haomian, > > > > Thanks for continuing to move this work forward. > > > > As I said back in October, I think the topic is in scope for the working > > group. I have read this recent version of the draft and think it is ready > > for adoption. > > > > Although the previous adoption poll did not have a lot of support, no one > > spoke against, and there does appear to be a group of people willing to > > work on it - I see 6 names on the document and a further 3 who supported > > adoption. > > > > If the chairs think that the draft can progress in the WG, that would be > > fine. If not, could they give a hint of what the authors should do? > > > > Thanks, > > Adrian > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Pce On Behalf Of Zhenghaomian (Zhenghaomian, > > Optical Technology Research Dept) > > Sent: 19 November 2018 09:48 > > > > Dear WG, > > > > According to IETF 103 discussion, we update this work with a few changes in > > the text to better specify the motivation. We believe this work is > > technically ready for WG adoption, again. > > > > Please take a look and your comments are highly welcome, thank you. > > > > Best wishes, > > Haomian (on behalf of all authors) > > > > -邮件原件- > > 发件人: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org] > > 发送时间: 2018年11月19日 15:55 > > 收件人: Victor Lopez ; Zhangxian (Xian) > > ; Oscar de Dios ; Oscar Gonzalez de > > Dios ; Zhenghaomian (Zhenghaomian, Optical > > Technology Research Dept) > > 主题: New Version Notification for draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing-08.txt > > > > > > A new version of I-D, draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing-08.txt > > has been successfully submitted by Haomian Zheng and posted to the IETF > > repository. > > > > Name: draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing > > Revision: 08 > > Title:Extensions to Path Computation Element Protocol > > (PCEP) to Support Resource Sharing-based Path Computation > > Document date:2018-11-19 > > Group:Individual Submission > > Pages:14 > > URL: > > https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing-08.txt > > Status: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing/ > > Htmlized: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing-08 > > Htmlized: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing > > Diff: > > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing-08 > > > > Abstract: > >Resource sharing in a network means two or more Label Switched Paths > >(LSPs) use common piece(s) of resource along their paths. This can > >help save network resource and is useful in scenarios such as LSP > >recovery or when two LSPs do not need to be active at the same time. > >A Path Computation Element (PCE) is responsible for path computation > >with such requirement. The resource-sharing-based path computation > >with better efficiency can be achieved together with the association > >object in PCEP. > > > >This document extends the Path Computation Element Protocol (PCEP) > >in order to support resource sharing-based path computation, which > >is a special case in the association path computation. > > > > > > > > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > > submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at > > tools.ietf.org. > > > > The IETF Secretariat > > > > ___ > > Pce mailing list > > Pce@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > > > > ___ > > Pce mailing list > > Pce@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > > > _ > > Ce message et ses pieces jointes
Re: [Pce] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing-08.txt
Hi again, Thank you Adrian for sharing your support on this I-D. We agree that no one expressed disagreement on that work. It therefore leaves this I-D in a draw situation: it missed an opportunity to get adopted, but there is no reason to exclude another poll to distinguish between bad poll timing and lack of support. I suggest the authors to keep on working on the document, including the list as much as possible and we will eventually consider a 2nd adoption poll. Cheers, Julien On 27/11/2018 21:35, Adrian Farrel wrote: > Hi Haomian, > > Thanks for continuing to move this work forward. > > As I said back in October, I think the topic is in scope for the working > group. I have read this recent version of the draft and think it is ready for > adoption. > > Although the previous adoption poll did not have a lot of support, no one > spoke against, and there does appear to be a group of people willing to work > on it - I see 6 names on the document and a further 3 who supported adoption. > > If the chairs think that the draft can progress in the WG, that would be > fine. If not, could they give a hint of what the authors should do? > > Thanks, > Adrian > > -Original Message- > From: Pce On Behalf Of Zhenghaomian (Zhenghaomian, > Optical Technology Research Dept) > Sent: 19 November 2018 09:48 > > Dear WG, > > According to IETF 103 discussion, we update this work with a few changes in > the text to better specify the motivation. We believe this work is > technically ready for WG adoption, again. > > Please take a look and your comments are highly welcome, thank you. > > Best wishes, > Haomian (on behalf of all authors) > > -邮件原件- > 发件人: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org] > 发送时间: 2018年11月19日 15:55 > 收件人: Victor Lopez ; Zhangxian (Xian) ; > Oscar de Dios ; Oscar Gonzalez de Dios ; > Zhenghaomian (Zhenghaomian, Optical Technology Research Dept) > > 主题: New Version Notification for draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing-08.txt > > > A new version of I-D, draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing-08.txt > has been successfully submitted by Haomian Zheng and posted to the IETF > repository. > > Name: draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing > Revision: 08 > Title:Extensions to Path Computation Element Protocol (PCEP) > to Support Resource Sharing-based Path Computation > Document date:2018-11-19 > Group:Individual Submission > Pages:14 > URL: > https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing-08.txt > Status: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing/ > Htmlized: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing-08 > Htmlized: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing > Diff: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing-08 > > Abstract: >Resource sharing in a network means two or more Label Switched Paths >(LSPs) use common piece(s) of resource along their paths. This can >help save network resource and is useful in scenarios such as LSP >recovery or when two LSPs do not need to be active at the same time. >A Path Computation Element (PCE) is responsible for path computation >with such requirement. The resource-sharing-based path computation >with better efficiency can be achieved together with the association >object in PCEP. > >This document extends the Path Computation Element Protocol (PCEP) >in order to support resource sharing-based path computation, which >is a special case in the association path computation. > > > > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > The IETF Secretariat > > ___ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > > ___ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce _ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have
Re: [Pce] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing-08.txt
Hi Haomian, Thanks for continuing to move this work forward. As I said back in October, I think the topic is in scope for the working group. I have read this recent version of the draft and think it is ready for adoption. Although the previous adoption poll did not have a lot of support, no one spoke against, and there does appear to be a group of people willing to work on it - I see 6 names on the document and a further 3 who supported adoption. If the chairs think that the draft can progress in the WG, that would be fine. If not, could they give a hint of what the authors should do? Thanks, Adrian -Original Message- From: Pce On Behalf Of Zhenghaomian (Zhenghaomian, Optical Technology Research Dept) Sent: 19 November 2018 09:48 To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing-08.txt Dear WG, According to IETF 103 discussion, we update this work with a few changes in the text to better specify the motivation. We believe this work is technically ready for WG adoption, again. Please take a look and your comments are highly welcome, thank you. Best wishes, Haomian (on behalf of all authors) -邮件原件- 发件人: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org] 发送时间: 2018年11月19日 15:55 收件人: Victor Lopez ; Zhangxian (Xian) ; Oscar de Dios ; Oscar Gonzalez de Dios ; Zhenghaomian (Zhenghaomian, Optical Technology Research Dept) 主题: New Version Notification for draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing-08.txt A new version of I-D, draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing-08.txt has been successfully submitted by Haomian Zheng and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing Revision: 08 Title: Extensions to Path Computation Element Protocol (PCEP) to Support Resource Sharing-based Path Computation Document date: 2018-11-19 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 14 URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing-08.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing/ Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing-08 Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-zhang-pce-resource-sharing-08 Abstract: Resource sharing in a network means two or more Label Switched Paths (LSPs) use common piece(s) of resource along their paths. This can help save network resource and is useful in scenarios such as LSP recovery or when two LSPs do not need to be active at the same time. A Path Computation Element (PCE) is responsible for path computation with such requirement. The resource-sharing-based path computation with better efficiency can be achieved together with the association object in PCEP. This document extends the Path Computation Element Protocol (PCEP) in order to support resource sharing-based path computation, which is a special case in the association path computation. Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce