Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-03
Support. -Original Message- From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 10:14 PM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-03 Hi all. Following the opposition expressed on merging MPLS and GMPLS documents for stateful PCE, the sense of the room was in favor of adopting the aforementionned I-D. Now we would like to get the feedback of the mailing list: do you support draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-03 to become a foundation for a PCE WG document? As usual, reasons for your preference are welcome (not to say mandatory in case of opposition). Thanks, JP Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-03
Yes. Support Regards, Udayasree -Original Message- From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Shane Amante Sent: 13 November 2013 10:24 To: Julien Meuric Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-03 Support. -shane On Nov 12, 2013, at 6:14 AM, Julien Meuric julien.meu...@orange.com wrote: Hi all. Following the opposition expressed on merging MPLS and GMPLS documents for stateful PCE, the sense of the room was in favor of adopting the aforementionned I-D. Now we would like to get the feedback of the mailing list: do you support draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-03 to become a foundation for a PCE WG document? As usual, reasons for your preference are welcome (not to say mandatory in case of opposition). Thanks, JP Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-03
Support, thanks Ramon ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-03
Hi, do you support draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-03 to become a foundation for a PCE WG document? Support! Regards, Dhruv --- Dhruv Dhody System Architect, Huawei Technologies India Pvt. Ltd., Banagalore Mobile: +91-9845062422 This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it! -Original Message- From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 7:44 PM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp- 03 Hi all. Following the opposition expressed on merging MPLS and GMPLS documents for stateful PCE, the sense of the room was in favor of adopting the aforementionned I-D. Now we would like to get the feedback of the mailing list: do you support draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-03 to become a foundation for a PCE WG document? As usual, reasons for your preference are welcome (not to say mandatory in case of opposition). Thanks, JP Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-03
Support. On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Julien Meuric julien.meu...@orange.com wrote: Hi all. Following the opposition expressed on merging MPLS and GMPLS documents for stateful PCE, the sense of the room was in favor of adopting the aforementionned I-D. Now we would like to get the feedback of the mailing list: do you support draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-03 to become a foundation for a PCE WG document? As usual, reasons for your preference are welcome (not to say mandatory in case of opposition). Thanks, JP Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-03
Support. On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Julien Meuric julien.meu...@orange.comwrote: Hi all. Following the opposition expressed on merging MPLS and GMPLS documents for stateful PCE, the sense of the room was in favor of adopting the aforementionned I-D. Now we would like to get the feedback of the mailing list: do you support draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-03 to become a foundation for a PCE WG document? As usual, reasons for your preference are welcome (not to say mandatory in case of opposition). Thanks, JP Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-03
Support -- Regards, Víctor López (Ph.D.) Telefónica I+D, Global CTO Unit c/ Don Ramón de la Cruz, 82-84. 28006, Madrid (Spain). Phone. +34913128872 Email: vlo...@tid.es Web: https://people.tid.es/Victor.Lopez/ El 12/11/13 15:14, Julien Meuric julien.meu...@orange.com escribió: Hi all. Following the opposition expressed on merging MPLS and GMPLS documents for stateful PCE, the sense of the room was in favor of adopting the aforementionned I-D. Now we would like to get the feedback of the mailing list: do you support draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-03 to become a foundation for a PCE WG document? As usual, reasons for your preference are welcome (not to say mandatory in case of opposition). Thanks, JP Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-03
Support! Thanks Regards Š Zafar -Original Message- From: julien.meu...@orange.com julien.meu...@orange.com Organization: Orange Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 9:14 AM To: pce@ietf.org pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-03 Hi all. Following the opposition expressed on merging MPLS and GMPLS documents for stateful PCE, the sense of the room was in favor of adopting the aforementionned I-D. Now we would like to get the feedback of the mailing list: do you support draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-03 to become a foundation for a PCE WG document? As usual, reasons for your preference are welcome (not to say mandatory in case of opposition). Thanks, JP Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-03
Support as coauthor ^_^ On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Julien Meuric julien.meu...@orange.com wrote: Hi all. Following the opposition expressed on merging MPLS and GMPLS documents for stateful PCE, the sense of the room was in favor of adopting the aforementionned I-D. Now we would like to get the feedback of the mailing list: do you support draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-03 to become a foundation for a PCE WG document? As usual, reasons for your preference are welcome (not to say mandatory in case of opposition). Thanks, JP Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-03
Support. Young -Original Message- From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 8:14 AM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-03 Hi all. Following the opposition expressed on merging MPLS and GMPLS documents for stateful PCE, the sense of the room was in favor of adopting the aforementionned I-D. Now we would like to get the feedback of the mailing list: do you support draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-03 to become a foundation for a PCE WG document? As usual, reasons for your preference are welcome (not to say mandatory in case of opposition). Thanks, JP Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-03
Support as co-author. -Original Message- From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 6:14 AM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-03 Hi all. Following the opposition expressed on merging MPLS and GMPLS documents for stateful PCE, the sense of the room was in favor of adopting the aforementionned I-D. Now we would like to get the feedback of the mailing list: do you support draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-03 to become a foundation for a PCE WG document? As usual, reasons for your preference are welcome (not to say mandatory in case of opposition). Thanks, JP Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-03
Support. Thanks, Ambrose -Original Message- From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 9:14 AM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-03 Hi all. Following the opposition expressed on merging MPLS and GMPLS documents for stateful PCE, the sense of the room was in favor of adopting the aforementionned I-D. Now we would like to get the feedback of the mailing list: do you support draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-03 to become a foundation for a PCE WG document? As usual, reasons for your preference are welcome (not to say mandatory in case of opposition). Thanks, JP Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-03
Support Regards, Xian -Original Message- From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric Sent: 2013年11月12日 22:14 To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-03 Hi all. Following the opposition expressed on merging MPLS and GMPLS documents for stateful PCE, the sense of the room was in favor of adopting the aforementionned I-D. Now we would like to get the feedback of the mailing list: do you support draft-crabbe-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-03 to become a foundation for a PCE WG document? As usual, reasons for your preference are welcome (not to say mandatory in case of opposition). Thanks, JP Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
