Re: [Pce] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-14: (with COMMENT)
Hi, Jon, On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 11:25 AM Jonathan Hardwick < jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com> wrote: > Spencer, > > I think it is as Adrian has described below (thanks Adrian). I will add > the reference to RFC 8413. > Thanks! Spencer > Best regards > Jon > > -Original Message- > From: Adrian Farrel > Sent: Thursday, 6 December, 2018 2:49 PM > To: 'Spencer Dawkins' ; 'The IESG' < > i...@ietf.org> > Cc: pce@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org; > draft-ietf-pce-segment-rout...@ietf.org > Subject: RE: [Pce] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on > draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-14: (with COMMENT) > > I think that for "bandwidth calendaring" we might reference 8413. > > I *think* "on-demand engineering" is simply the converse. That is, traffic > engineering / path computation at the time of request for service delivery. > That is "what we have always done" and might not qualify for a specific > reference. > > But the authors will have a better view of what they meant > > Cheers, > Adrian > -- > It's Christmas. > Buy someone you love a book of fairy tales. > https://www.feedaread.com/profiles/8604/ > Available from your favourite online bookseller. > Or contact me to receive a signed copy by mail. > > -Original Message- > From: Pce On Behalf Of Spencer Dawkins > Sent: 06 December 2018 04:38 > To: The IESG > Cc: pce@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org; > draft-ietf-pce-segment-rout...@ietf.org > Subject: [Pce] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on > draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-14: (with COMMENT) > > Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-14: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing/ > > > > -- > COMMENT: > -- > > I can guess what > >This mechanism is useful in Software Defined >Networking (SDN) applications, such as on-demand engineering, or >bandwidth calendaring. > > means, but I'm guessing. Is there a reference for "on-demand engineering" > or "bandwidth calendaring"? > > > ___ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > > ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-14: (with COMMENT)
Spencer, I think it is as Adrian has described below (thanks Adrian). I will add the reference to RFC 8413. Best regards Jon -Original Message- From: Adrian Farrel Sent: Thursday, 6 December, 2018 2:49 PM To: 'Spencer Dawkins' ; 'The IESG' Cc: pce@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-pce-segment-rout...@ietf.org Subject: RE: [Pce] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-14: (with COMMENT) I think that for "bandwidth calendaring" we might reference 8413. I *think* "on-demand engineering" is simply the converse. That is, traffic engineering / path computation at the time of request for service delivery. That is "what we have always done" and might not qualify for a specific reference. But the authors will have a better view of what they meant Cheers, Adrian -- It's Christmas. Buy someone you love a book of fairy tales. https://www.feedaread.com/profiles/8604/ Available from your favourite online bookseller. Or contact me to receive a signed copy by mail. -Original Message- From: Pce On Behalf Of Spencer Dawkins Sent: 06 December 2018 04:38 To: The IESG Cc: pce@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-pce-segment-rout...@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-14: (with COMMENT) Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-14: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing/ -- COMMENT: -- I can guess what This mechanism is useful in Software Defined Networking (SDN) applications, such as on-demand engineering, or bandwidth calendaring. means, but I'm guessing. Is there a reference for "on-demand engineering" or "bandwidth calendaring"? ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-14: (with COMMENT)
I think that for "bandwidth calendaring" we might reference 8413. I *think* "on-demand engineering" is simply the converse. That is, traffic engineering / path computation at the time of request for service delivery. That is "what we have always done" and might not qualify for a specific reference. But the authors will have a better view of what they meant Cheers, Adrian -- It's Christmas. Buy someone you love a book of fairy tales. https://www.feedaread.com/profiles/8604/ Available from your favourite online bookseller. Or contact me to receive a signed copy by mail. -Original Message- From: Pce On Behalf Of Spencer Dawkins Sent: 06 December 2018 04:38 To: The IESG Cc: pce@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-pce-segment-rout...@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-14: (with COMMENT) Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-14: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing/ -- COMMENT: -- I can guess what This mechanism is useful in Software Defined Networking (SDN) applications, such as on-demand engineering, or bandwidth calendaring. means, but I'm guessing. Is there a reference for "on-demand engineering" or "bandwidth calendaring"? ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
[Pce] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-14: (with COMMENT)
Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-14: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing/ -- COMMENT: -- I can guess what This mechanism is useful in Software Defined Networking (SDN) applications, such as on-demand engineering, or bandwidth calendaring. means, but I'm guessing. Is there a reference for "on-demand engineering" or "bandwidth calendaring"? ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
