[Pce] Status of draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp

[Adrian Farrel]

Hi All,

In Buenos Aires Jon presented the WG status (thanks) and showed that
draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp is "Pending shepherd review".

Just looking now (because quite a lot of new work seems to depend on the
PCInitiate message) I see that:

- The I-D expired a couple of days ago (April 21, 2016)

- The last discussion on the list was an email from Julien suggesting that
   some work was needed to address open questions on the list.

I'd like to see this I-D move forward now (as well as the stateful PCE I-D!).
Can I offer my assistance to the authors in any way? I am willing to shovel
shit, or just make editorial changes.

Let's dig the WG out of the treacle and start to be relevant again :-)

Thanks,
Adrian

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] Status of draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp

[Loa Andersson]

Working Group, et.al.,

I agree with Adrian, let me know if I can help, at least I can review
if you want to have another review before wglc.

/Loa

On 2016-04-26 16:45, Adrian Farrel wrote:

Hi All,

In Buenos Aires Jon presented the WG status (thanks) and showed that
draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp is "Pending shepherd review".

Just looking now (because quite a lot of new work seems to depend on the
PCInitiate message) I see that:

- The I-D expired a couple of days ago (April 21, 2016)

- The last discussion on the list was an email from Julien suggesting that
some work was needed to address open questions on the list.

I'd like to see this I-D move forward now (as well as the stateful PCE I-D!).
Can I offer my assistance to the authors in any way? I am willing to shovel
shit, or just make editorial changes.

Let's dig the WG out of the treacle and start to be relevant again :-)

Thanks,
Adrian

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce



___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] Status of draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp

[Ina Minei]

Adrian,

Thank you for bringing this up. I will repost the initiation draft, I am
aware that it expired. Before doing so, will reply to what I think is the
unfinished thread (
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/wn4gGwZnTZS53pbyg1eCHw3YMVE) ,
please let me know if there was a different thread that you are referring
to. Thank you for bringing this up, this had completely fallen through the
cracks on my end.

Thank you for your offer to help with the stateful PCE I-D. Your help would
be appreciated in letting us know if there are pending changes needed, as I
am assuming that the version posted a month ago addressed all issues, want
to make sure this is not a similar situation as the initiation draft.

Thank you,

Ina


On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 1:45 AM, Adrian Farrel  wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> In Buenos Aires Jon presented the WG status (thanks) and showed that
> draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp is "Pending shepherd review".
>
> Just looking now (because quite a lot of new work seems to depend on the
> PCInitiate message) I see that:
>
> - The I-D expired a couple of days ago (April 21, 2016)
>
> - The last discussion on the list was an email from Julien suggesting that
>some work was needed to address open questions on the list.
>
> I'd like to see this I-D move forward now (as well as the stateful PCE
> I-D!).
> Can I offer my assistance to the authors in any way? I am willing to shovel
> shit, or just make editorial changes.
>
> Let's dig the WG out of the treacle and start to be relevant again :-)
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian
>
>
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] Status of draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp

[Adrian Farrel]

Hi Ina,
 
Great that you have this under control.
 
Looks like "review and review" are the actions on me.
Will do.
 
Cheers,
Adrian
 
From: Ina Minei [mailto:inami...@google.com] 
Sent: 02 May 2016 17:17
To: 'Adrian Farrel' (adr...@olddog.co.uk)
Cc: pce; draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Status of draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp
 
Adrian, 
 
Thank you for bringing this up. I will repost the initiation draft, I am aware 
that it expired. Before doing so, will reply to what I think is the unfinished 
thread (  
 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/wn4gGwZnTZS53pbyg1eCHw3YMVE) , please 
let me know if there was a different thread that you are referring to. Thank 
you for bringing this up, this had completely fallen through the cracks on my 
end. 
 
Thank you for your offer to help with the stateful PCE I-D. Your help would be 
appreciated in letting us know if there are pending changes needed, as I 
am assuming that the version posted a month ago addressed all issues, want to 
make sure this is not a similar situation as the initiation draft. 
 
Thank you, 
 
Ina 
 
 
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 1:45 AM, Adrian Farrel  wrote:
Hi All,

In Buenos Aires Jon presented the WG status (thanks) and showed that
draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp is "Pending shepherd review".

Just looking now (because quite a lot of new work seems to depend on the
PCInitiate message) I see that:

- The I-D expired a couple of days ago (April 21, 2016)

- The last discussion on the list was an email from Julien suggesting that
   some work was needed to address open questions on the list.

I'd like to see this I-D move forward now (as well as the stateful PCE I-D!).
Can I offer my assistance to the authors in any way? I am willing to shovel
shit, or just make editorial changes.

Let's dig the WG out of the treacle and start to be relevant again :-)

Thanks,
Adrian
 
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] Status of draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp

[Andrew Veitch]

Hi,

Is there an update regarding this draft and/or any additional supporting work 
needed?   Thanks.

Andy


Re: [Pce] Status of draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp
"Adrian Farrel" mailto:adr...@olddog.co.uk>> Tue, 03 May 
2016 19:16 UTC

Hi Ina,
Great that you have this under control.

Looks like "review and review" are the actions on me.
Will do.

Cheers,
Adrian

From: Ina Minei [mailto:inami...@google.com]
Sent: 02 May 2016 17:17
To: 'Adrian Farrel' (adr...@olddog.co.uk<mailto:adr...@olddog.co.uk>)
Cc: pce; 
draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-...@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Status of draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp

Adrian,

Thank you for bringing this up. I will repost the initiation draft, I am aware 
that it expired. Before doing so, will reply to what I think is the unfinished 
thread (  
<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/wn4gGwZnTZS53pbyg1eCHw3YMVE> 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/wn4gGwZnTZS53pbyg1eCHw3YMVE) , please 
let me know if there was a different thread that you are referring to. Thank 
you for bringing this up, this had completely fallen through the cracks on my 
end.

Thank you for your offer to help with the stateful PCE I-D. Your help would be 
appreciated in letting us know if there are pending changes needed, as I
am assuming that the version posted a month ago addressed all issues, want to 
make sure this is not a similar situation as the initiation draft.

Thank you,

Ina


On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 1:45 AM, Adrian Farrel 
mailto:adr...@olddog.co.uk>> wrote:
Hi All,

In Buenos Aires Jon presented the WG status (thanks) and showed that
draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp is "Pending shepherd review".

Just looking now (because quite a lot of new work seems to depend on the
PCInitiate message) I see that:

- The I-D expired a couple of days ago (April 21, 2016)

- The last discussion on the list was an email from Julien suggesting that
   some work was needed to address open questions on the list.

I'd like to see this I-D move forward now (as well as the stateful PCE I-D!).
Can I offer my assistance to the authors in any way? I am willing to shovel
shit, or just make editorial changes.

Let's dig the WG out of the treacle and start to be relevant again :-)

Thanks,
Adrian





The information transmitted herein is intended only for the person or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary and/or 
privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, 
or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or 
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this 
in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

Re: [Pce] Status of draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp

[Girish Birajdar]

Hi,

about #5.4 LSP deletion
" A  PLSP-ID of zero removes all LSPs that were initiated by the PCE...
   Following the removal of the LSP, the PCC
   MUST send a PCRpt as described in [I-D.ietf-pce-stateful-pce].  The
   SRP object in the PCRpt MUST include the SRP-ID-number from the
   PCInitiate message that triggered the removal.  The R flag in the SRP
   object SHOULD be set.
"

The draft needs to clarify PCRpt message for such cases:
1. Does PCC send single PCRpt (with SRP-ID)?
2. PCC sends PCRpt for each deleted LSP. In such cases PCE will have to
accept multiple PCRpt with same SRP-ID.

Thanks
-Girish


On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Andrew Veitch 
wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> Is there an update regarding this draft and/or any additional supporting
> work needed?   Thanks.
>
> Andy
>
>
> Re: [Pce] Status of draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp
> "Adrian Farrel"  Tue, 03 May 2016 19:16 UTC
>
> Hi Ina,
> Great that you have this under control.
>
> Looks like "review and review" are the actions on me.
> Will do.
>
> Cheers,
> Adrian
>
> From: Ina Minei [mailto:inami...@google.com ]
> Sent: 02 May 2016 17:17
> To: 'Adrian Farrel' (adr...@olddog.co.uk)
> Cc: pce; draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Status of draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp
>
> Adrian,
>
> Thank you for bringing this up. I will repost the initiation draft, I am 
> aware that it expired. Before doing so, will reply to what I think is the 
> unfinished thread (  
> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/wn4gGwZnTZS53pbyg1eCHw3YMVE> 
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/wn4gGwZnTZS53pbyg1eCHw3YMVE) , 
> please let me know if there was a different thread that you are referring to. 
> Thank you for bringing this up, this had completely fallen through the cracks 
> on my end.
>
> Thank you for your offer to help with the stateful PCE I-D. Your help would 
> be appreciated in letting us know if there are pending changes needed, as I
> am assuming that the version posted a month ago addressed all issues, want to 
> make sure this is not a similar situation as the initiation draft.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Ina
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 1:45 AM, Adrian Farrel  wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> In Buenos Aires Jon presented the WG status (thanks) and showed that
> draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp is "Pending shepherd review".
>
> Just looking now (because quite a lot of new work seems to depend on the
> PCInitiate message) I see that:
>
> - The I-D expired a couple of days ago (April 21, 2016)
>
> - The last discussion on the list was an email from Julien suggesting that
>some work was needed to address open questions on the list.
>
> I'd like to see this I-D move forward now (as well as the stateful PCE I-D!).
> Can I offer my assistance to the authors in any way? I am willing to shovel
> shit, or just make editorial changes.
>
> Let's dig the WG out of the treacle and start to be relevant again :-)
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian
>
>
>
>
> --
> The information transmitted herein is intended only for the person or
> entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary
> and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or
> other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by
> persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
> received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material
> from any computer.
>
>
> ___
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>
>
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce