Re: [Pce] Status of draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-ext

2017-04-11 Thread Julien Meuric

  
  
Hi Cyril, hi Adrian,

Don't worry, even though we missed several datatracker cycles, the
I-D isn't forgotten and a shepherd has been appointed: me. ;-)

The chairs had decided to apply WFQ over the I-D processing queue.
Considering the low pressure product implementers put on the
interoperability along this I-D (feedback to the chairs welcome on
that), it got preempted to free bandwidth for the stateful I-Ds and
the associated codepoint clash. Now that these are with the IESG, I
should be able to share my review soon (i.e., by next IETF).

Regards,

Julien


Apr. 11, 2017 - cmarga...@juniper.net:


  
  
  
  
  
  
  

  Hi, 
  
  
  From what I can recall, there was no comment pending.
Grep'ing through my archives I found : the following last messages regarding the gmpls
  draft are :
  
  
  Other comments addressed : https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/3oswQvIe4THUtUSUnXwKfmfeVmg,
also reflected in https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/94/slides/slides-94-pce-0.pdf

  
  
  
  WG comments addressed: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/vPZsnrCy4kh7H8VaMDz6I-XI8uw
  
  
  
  
  The document status from the slides is Shepherd assigned.
  
  
  I will be happy to address any actions that I can complete
on my side.
  
  
  Cyril


From:
Adrian Farrel 
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 4:40:28 PM
  
   

  
  
  Thanks Jon!

Looks like I need to chivvy the authors of
draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions.

But, oh look! It has expired. A year ago!

Wow! Any archaeologists out there want to dig through the
mail archive to find
out what needed to be done?

Thanks,
Adrian

> -Original Message-
> From: Jonathan Hardwick [mailto:jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com]
> Sent: 10 April 2017 08:37
> 
> Hi Adrian
> 
> Thanks for checking.  This draft depends normatively on
draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-
> pcep-extensions, which I believe still has some actions
to be completed.  Our
plan
> is to advance both together.
> 
> Cheers
> Jon
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org]
On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> Sent: 07 April 2017 18:33
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Did https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-ext
disappear
> down a crack?
> 
> Looks like WG last call completed and the draft was
updated.
> Also the shepherd write-up was updated.
> 
> Does the big red button need to be pressed to send this
to the AD?
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian
> 
  


  


___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce


Re: [Pce] Status of draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-ext

2017-04-10 Thread Jonathan Hardwick
Hi Adrian

Thanks for checking.  This draft depends normatively on 
draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions, which I believe still has some actions to 
be completed.  Our plan is to advance both together.

Cheers
Jon

-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
Sent: 07 April 2017 18:33
To: pce@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Status of draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-ext

Hi,

Did https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-ext disappear down 
a crack?

Looks like WG last call completed and the draft was updated.
Also the shepherd write-up was updated.

Does the big red button need to be pressed to send this to the AD?

Thanks,
Adrian


___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce


[Pce] Status of draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-ext

2017-04-07 Thread Adrian Farrel
Hi,

Did https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-ext disappear down
a crack?

Looks like WG last call completed and the draft was updated.
Also the shepherd write-up was updated.

Does the big red button need to be pressed to send this to the AD?

Thanks,
Adrian


___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce