Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection-05
This poll has ended, with the result that the document will be adopted by the PCE working group. Authors - please could you resubmit the document (without changes) as draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection-00. There were some comments received from Greg Mirsky during working group last call. Authors - please could you ensure that these comments are addressed promptly. If any changes are required, you can include them in version -01 of the document. Many thanks Jon From: Jonathan Hardwick [mailto:jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com] Sent: 27 March 2018 12:10 To: pce@ietf.org; draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protect...@ietf.org Cc: pce-cha...@ietf.org Subject: WG adoption poll for draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection-05 Dear PCE WG This is the start of a two week poll on making draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection-05 a PCE working group document. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection/ Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If indicating no, please state your reasons. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document. The poll ends on Tuesday, April 10. Many thanks, Jon and Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection-05
Yes/Support.. Regards, Mahendra From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lizhenbin Sent: 29 March 2018 08:36 To: Jonathan Hardwick; pce@ietf.org; draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protect...@ietf.org Cc: pce-cha...@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] 答复: WG adoption poll for draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection-05 Yes/support. From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 13:10 To: pce@ietf.org<mailto:pce@ietf.org>; draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protect...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protect...@ietf.org> Cc: pce-cha...@ietf.org<mailto:pce-cha...@ietf.org> Subject: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection-05 Dear PCE WG This is the start of a two week poll on making draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection-05 a PCE working group document. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection/ Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating “yes/support” or “no/do not support”. If indicating no, please state your reasons. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document. The poll ends on Tuesday, April 10. Many thanks, Jon and Julien _ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection-05
Dear All, yes/support with comments: - since the draft does not discuss actual control of the protection switchover but introduces objects related to Path Protection Association Group I encourage authors to consider reflecting that in the title of the document; - Path Protection Association Group, as I understand, defined as 1:N, i.e. one working and N protection paths, while M:N is more general case or protection. I encourage authors to consider ways to support M:N PPAG; - above I've made assumption that the protection mode supported by PPAG is 1:N (1:1 is just special case). But PPAG may be used to signal association for 1+1 protection scheme. If that is the case, can 1+1 be expressed using proposed S and P flags or additional flag is required? Regards, Greg > > > *From:* Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Jonathan Hardwick > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 27, 2018 13:10 > *To:* pce@ietf.org; draft-ananthakrishnan-pce- > stateful-path-protect...@ietf.org > *Cc:* pce-cha...@ietf.org > *Subject:* [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-ananthakrishnan-pce- > stateful-path-protection-05 > > > > Dear PCE WG > > > > This is the start of a two week poll on making > draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection-05 > a PCE working group document. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ananthakrishnan-pce- > stateful-path-protection/ > > > > Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating > “yes/support” or “no/do not support”. If indicating no, please state your > reasons. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to > see addressed once the document is a WG document. > > > > The poll ends on Tuesday, April 10. > > > > Many thanks, > > > > Jon and Julien > > > > > > _ > > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations > confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu > ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages > electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou > falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged > information that may be protected by law; > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete > this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been > modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. > > > ___ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > > ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection-05
Support From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 13:10 To: pce@ietf.org; draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protect...@ietf.org Cc: pce-cha...@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection-05 Dear PCE WG This is the start of a two week poll on making draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection-05 a PCE working group document. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection/ Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If indicating no, please state your reasons. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document. The poll ends on Tuesday, April 10. Many thanks, Jon and Julien _ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection-05
Yes/support On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 04:10 Jonathan Hardwick < jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com> wrote: > Dear PCE WG > > > > This is the start of a two week poll on making > draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection-05 a PCE working group > document. > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection/ > > > > Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating > “yes/support” or “no/do not support”. If indicating no, please state your > reasons. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to > see addressed once the document is a WG document. > > > > The poll ends on Tuesday, April 10. > > > > Many thanks, > > > > Jon and Julien > > > > > ___ > Pce mailing list > Pce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce > ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection-05
yes/support as a co-author. Thanks, Siva From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan <h...@packetdesign.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 12:50 PM To: Jonathan Hardwick <jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com>; pce@ietf.org; draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protect...@ietf.org Cc: pce-cha...@ietf.org Subject: Re: WG adoption poll for draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection-05 yes/support as a co-author. - Hari From: Jonathan Hardwick <jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com<mailto:jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com>> Date: Tuesday, 27 March 2018 at 04:10 To: "pce@ietf.org<mailto:pce@ietf.org>" <pce@ietf.org<mailto:pce@ietf.org>>, "draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protect...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protect...@ietf.org>" <draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protect...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protect...@ietf.org>> Cc: "pce-cha...@ietf.org<mailto:pce-cha...@ietf.org>" <pce-cha...@ietf.org<mailto:pce-cha...@ietf.org>> Subject: WG adoption poll for draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection-05 Resent-From: <alias-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:alias-boun...@ietf.org>> Resent-To: <h...@packetdesign.com<mailto:h...@packetdesign.com>>, <ms...@cisco.com<mailto:ms...@cisco.com>>, <rto...@juniper.net<mailto:rto...@juniper.net>>, <inami...@google.com<mailto:inami...@google.com>>, <edward.cra...@gmail.com<mailto:edward.cra...@gmail.com>>, <dhruv.i...@gmail.com<mailto:dhruv.i...@gmail.com>> Resent-Date: Tuesday, 27 March 2018 at 04:09 Dear PCE WG This is the start of a two week poll on making draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection-05 a PCE working group document. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection/ Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating “yes/support” or “no/do not support”. If indicating no, please state your reasons. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document. The poll ends on Tuesday, April 10. Many thanks, Jon and Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection-05
yes/support as a co-author. - Hari From: Jonathan Hardwick <jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com> Date: Tuesday, 27 March 2018 at 04:10 To: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>, "draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protect...@ietf.org" <draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protect...@ietf.org> Cc: "pce-cha...@ietf.org" <pce-cha...@ietf.org> Subject: WG adoption poll for draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection-05 Resent-From: <alias-boun...@ietf.org> Resent-To: <h...@packetdesign.com>, <ms...@cisco.com>, <rto...@juniper.net>, <inami...@google.com>, <edward.cra...@gmail.com>, <dhruv.i...@gmail.com> Resent-Date: Tuesday, 27 March 2018 at 04:09 Dear PCE WG This is the start of a two week poll on making draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection-05 a PCE working group document. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection/ Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating “yes/support” or “no/do not support”. If indicating no, please state your reasons. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document. The poll ends on Tuesday, April 10. Many thanks, Jon and Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection-05
Hi WG, Chairs, Yes, support. Thanks, Rakesh From: Pce <pce-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Jonathan Hardwick <jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com> Date: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 at 7:09 AM To: "pce@ietf.org" <pce@ietf.org>, "draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protect...@ietf.org" <draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protect...@ietf.org> Cc: "pce-cha...@ietf.org" <pce-cha...@ietf.org> Subject: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection-05 Dear PCE WG This is the start of a two week poll on making draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection-05 a PCE working group document. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection/ Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating “yes/support” or “no/do not support”. If indicating no, please state your reasons. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document. The poll ends on Tuesday, April 10. Many thanks, Jon and Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection-05
Yes/support! Dhruv (as a co-author) On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 12:09 PM, Jonathan Hardwick < jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com> wrote: > Dear PCE WG > > > > This is the start of a two week poll on making > draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection-05 > a PCE working group document. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ananthakrishnan-pce- > stateful-path-protection/ > > > > Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating > “yes/support” or “no/do not support”. If indicating no, please state your > reasons. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to > see addressed once the document is a WG document. > > > > The poll ends on Tuesday, April 10. > > > > Many thanks, > > > > Jon and Julien > > > > > ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
[Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection-05
Dear PCE WG This is the start of a two week poll on making draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection-05 a PCE working group document. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protection/ Please review the draft and send an email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If indicating no, please state your reasons. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document. The poll ends on Tuesday, April 10. Many thanks, Jon and Julien ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
