Re: [PD-dev] pd-extended-dev 10.7.3 update
what do you think about adding: imagemagick, imagemagick2-dev, imagemagick2-svg, imagemagick2-shlibs the osx 64 bit builds will eventually need it for image support no? m On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: Excellent, thanks for the report, and thanks for taking care of the issues. About the pd-extended-dev=0.43.1-1 thing, I don't really know what triggers it, but it doesn't seem to prevent it from working. .hc On Apr 27, 2012, at 11:27 AM, m.e.grimm wrote: hey hans, i just removed my fink install and started over because i somehow made a huge mess of it. anyway. other than the gmerlin/gavl/gmerlin-avdecoder packages that will need to be replaced with burkhards future release your pd-extended-dev.info works OK ... although I am getting this The following packages will be REMOVED: jack-dev i am not sure what the issue is there but fink is making me do: sudo apt-get install pd-extended-dev=0.43.1-1 rather than fink install pd-extended-dev not sure what the issue is there but it seems very minor. i dont remember this before. the whole console output is below. I also just emailed the maintainers of libdca and amrnb to add their .infos to fink 10.7. they build fine. they just need to be added to 10.7. cheers m megrimm-mbp:pd-extended-dev.infos megrimm$ sudo apt-get install pd-extended-dev=0.43.1-1 Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following packages will be REMOVED: jack-dev The following NEW packages will be installed: pd-extended-dev 0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 1 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/1402B of archives. After unpacking 147kB will be freed. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] n Abort. megrimm-mbp:pd-extended-dev.infos megrimm$ fink install pd-extended-devInformation about 4678 packages read in 1 seconds. The following package will be installed or updated: pd-extended-dev Reading buildlock packages... Could not resolve inconsistent dependencies! Fink isn't sure how to install the above packages safely. You may be able to fix things by running: fink scanpackages sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install pd-extended-dev=0.43.1-1 Failed: Fink::SysState: Could not resolve inconsistent dependencies megrimm-mbp:pd-extended-dev.infos megrimm$ sudo apt-get install pd-extended-dev=0.43.1-1 Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following packages will be REMOVED: jack-dev The following NEW packages will be installed: pd-extended-dev 0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 1 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/1402B of archives. After unpacking 147kB will be freed. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] (Reading database ... 38909 files and directories currently installed.) Removing jack-dev ... Selecting previously deselected package pd-extended-dev. (Reading database ... 3 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking pd-extended-dev (from .../pd-extended-dev_0.43.1-1_darwin-x86_64.deb) ... Setting up pd-extended-dev (0.43.1-1) ... -- m.e.grimm | m.f.a | ed.m. megr...@gmail.com _ ___ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev As we enjoy great advantages from inventions of others, we should be glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours; and this we should do freely and generously. - Benjamin Franklin -- m.e.grimm | m.f.a | ed.m. megr...@gmail.com _ ___ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
Re: [PD-dev] pd-extended-dev 10.7.3 update
Once that's finalized, then we can add it. Who knows, maybe someone will write the code to use the native API... .hc On Apr 28, 2012, at 8:18 AM, m.e.grimm wrote: what do you think about adding: imagemagick, imagemagick2-dev, imagemagick2-svg, imagemagick2-shlibs the osx 64 bit builds will eventually need it for image support no? m On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote: Excellent, thanks for the report, and thanks for taking care of the issues. About the pd-extended-dev=0.43.1-1 thing, I don't really know what triggers it, but it doesn't seem to prevent it from working. .hc On Apr 27, 2012, at 11:27 AM, m.e.grimm wrote: hey hans, i just removed my fink install and started over because i somehow made a huge mess of it. anyway. other than the gmerlin/gavl/gmerlin-avdecoder packages that will need to be replaced with burkhards future release your pd-extended-dev.info works OK ... although I am getting this The following packages will be REMOVED: jack-dev i am not sure what the issue is there but fink is making me do: sudo apt-get install pd-extended-dev=0.43.1-1 rather than fink install pd-extended-dev not sure what the issue is there but it seems very minor. i dont remember this before. the whole console output is below. I also just emailed the maintainers of libdca and amrnb to add their .infos to fink 10.7. they build fine. they just need to be added to 10.7. cheers m megrimm-mbp:pd-extended-dev.infos megrimm$ sudo apt-get install pd-extended-dev=0.43.1-1 Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following packages will be REMOVED: jack-dev The following NEW packages will be installed: pd-extended-dev 0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 1 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/1402B of archives. After unpacking 147kB will be freed. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] n Abort. megrimm-mbp:pd-extended-dev.infos megrimm$ fink install pd-extended-devInformation about 4678 packages read in 1 seconds. The following package will be installed or updated: pd-extended-dev Reading buildlock packages... Could not resolve inconsistent dependencies! Fink isn't sure how to install the above packages safely. You may be able to fix things by running: fink scanpackages sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install pd-extended-dev=0.43.1-1 Failed: Fink::SysState: Could not resolve inconsistent dependencies megrimm-mbp:pd-extended-dev.infos megrimm$ sudo apt-get install pd-extended-dev=0.43.1-1 Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following packages will be REMOVED: jack-dev The following NEW packages will be installed: pd-extended-dev 0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 1 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/1402B of archives. After unpacking 147kB will be freed. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] (Reading database ... 38909 files and directories currently installed.) Removing jack-dev ... Selecting previously deselected package pd-extended-dev. (Reading database ... 3 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking pd-extended-dev (from .../pd-extended-dev_0.43.1-1_darwin-x86_64.deb) ... Setting up pd-extended-dev (0.43.1-1) ... -- m.e.grimm | m.f.a | ed.m. megr...@gmail.com _ ___ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev As we enjoy great advantages from inventions of others, we should be glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours; and this we should do freely and generously. - Benjamin Franklin -- m.e.grimm | m.f.a | ed.m. megr...@gmail.com _ 'You people have such restrictive dress for women,’ she said, hobbling away in three inch heels and panty hose to finish out another pink-collar temp pool day. - “Hijab Scene #2, by Mohja Kahf ___ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
[PD-dev] [ pure-data-Patches-3521816 ] Setting externals file extension, check for ANDROID platform
Patches item #3521816, was opened at 2012-04-26 19:25 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by zmoelnig You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478072aid=3521816group_id=55736 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: puredata Group: bugfix Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: https://www.google.com/accounts () Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Setting externals file extension, check for ANDROID platform Initial Comment: The Android GCC toolchain #defines linux, so the Android specific branch was never being hit. Moving the check above Linux fixes it. Before this patch external extensions .l_i386 and .pd_linux are checked for on Android. This patch will accept either .l_arm or .pd_linux, so the externals built by PdCore will still work. It doesn't address the issue of Android x86. Should probably add a check for arm vs x86 architecture too, but I haven't been able to find documentation of the architecture macros. -- Comment By: IOhannes m zmölnig (zmoelnig) Date: 2012-04-28 10:16 Message: thanks for the respone. ad #1: very few people using .d_ppc/.d_fat is not really creating any problems, is it? ad #2: will do (though afaict, PdX has a patch that actively removes the functionality; should i create a patch that re-adds the extensions or should i modify (eventually remove) the patch that erroneously removes the extensions? -- Comment By: Hans-Christoph Steiner (eighthave) Date: 2012-04-27 19:32 Message: In response to #1: very few people are using .d_ppc and .d_fat files with Pd vanilla. and #2: patches welcome -- Comment By: IOhannes m zmölnig (zmoelnig) Date: 2012-04-27 08:54 Message: flames Those file extension have a lot of issues as they are, for example, no other program for Darwin/MacOSX uses per-arch file extension...what exactly is the lot of issues here? no other program for Darwin/MacOSX is called Pd, and still this is no issue. /flames moreflames if Pd-extended ignores binary files that it could happily load and by doing so breaks compatibility with Pd-vanilla, i would say this is a bug in Pd-extended. /moreflames -- Comment By: Hans-Christoph Steiner (eighthave) Date: 2012-04-27 07:36 Message: What about just defining '.so' has a possibility if __linux__, __FreeBSD__, __FreeBSD_kernel__, __OpenBSD__ are defined, then people can choose to manage the architecture in their own way. Those file extension have a lot of issues as they are, for example, no other program for Darwin/MacOSX uses per-arch file extensions: they use universal binaries. For this reason , Pd-extended on Mac OS X only uses .pd_darwin and universal binaries and ignores .d_fat and .d_ppc. Also, Pd's .l_ia64 does not actually mean ia64 arch but instead amd64/x86_64, so that file extension is just wrong. -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478072aid=3521816group_id=55736 ___ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
