Re: [PD-dev] pix_multiblob mem leak

2010-03-15 Thread Gerrie Roos
This is the first time looking at pd/gem code, so I might have it
completely wrong, but the following looks suspicious:

pix_multiblob.cpp:216:
  t_atom*ap = new t_atom[2+blobNumber*8];

ap then gets passed to outlet_anything and never freed.  I looked at
some other examples of outlet_* usage and it always looks as if the
memory passed is on the stack or freed again by the caller, e.g.:
pix_record.cpp:184 is on the stack.  Is data always copied between
outlet/inlets or am I missing some mechanism that optimizes by
transferring pointer ownership?

I couldn't find anything else in there that looks like it might leak.


2010/3/14 Gerrie Roos gerrier...@gmail.com:
 Hi, tnx for the reply!

 I started with Pd extented 0.41.4 (that's using Gem 0.91 I think) then
 I installed a file marked as gem-0.92.2-W32-i686.exe (fresh from
 http://gem.iem.at/) but if I look at the release notes in there it
 looks like 0.91 as well, but the .dll is a different size, so I assume
 the release notes are not up-to-date and I'm running 0.92.2.  Pd also
 prints out 0.92.2 when it starts up.  Sorry, no beer yet...

 Clock.avi comes standard with Windows XP at least.  Here's a copy:
 http://www.sendspace.com/file/smz01u

 Can't load alea.mpg with pix_film...just get an 'unable to open
 file...error.  Weird.

 Tried homer.avi, also leaks 8(

 Originally found the problem using my usb webcam and played around
 with the number of blobs quite a lot.  It always leaks when blobs are
 detected.  Probably not the webcam since it leaks with clock.avi and
 homer.avi as well.


 2010/3/14 IOhannes zmölnig zmoel...@iem.at:
 Gerrie Roos wrote:
 Hi!

 It looks like pix_multiblob is leaking about 4kB/frame/blob.  Anybody
 else seen this?  I'm in a bit of a tight spot.  I've got an
 installation coming up on 18 March and my extensive pd patch is now
 running out of memory every couple of hours.  Would love to check out
 the source code and try fix it myself but since I've never done any pd
 dev it will put me back a couple of days (at the least).  I'll buy you
 beer!

 Windows XP SP2
 Pd version 0.41.4-extended

 what Gem version is this?
 does the problem exist with the latest and greatest Gem (0.92.2)? (if
 not, i claim the beer :-))


 thanks for sending an example patch; it's pretty generic, and i do not
 see any memleak occuring here (using the alea.mpg example film).
 however, the bug might be related to the number of blobs found and the
 image format, neither of which i can reproduce;
 could you put the clock.avi online somewhere so i can download it?
 or: how does your patch behave with homer.avi?

 fmadrs
 IOhannes




___
Pd-dev mailing list
Pd-dev@iem.at
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev


Re: [PD-dev] pix_multiblob mem leak

2010-03-15 Thread Gerrie Roos
From the GemFAQ it appears that setting up a Windows build environment
is a pain...should I even attempt to set up my own?  What's the
chances of success within a couple of hours?

2010/3/15 Gerrie Roos gerrier...@gmail.com:
 This is the first time looking at pd/gem code, so I might have it
 completely wrong, but the following looks suspicious:

 pix_multiblob.cpp:216:
  t_atom*ap = new t_atom[2+blobNumber*8];

 ap then gets passed to outlet_anything and never freed.  I looked at
 some other examples of outlet_* usage and it always looks as if the
 memory passed is on the stack or freed again by the caller, e.g.:
 pix_record.cpp:184 is on the stack.  Is data always copied between
 outlet/inlets or am I missing some mechanism that optimizes by
 transferring pointer ownership?

 I couldn't find anything else in there that looks like it might leak.


 2010/3/14 Gerrie Roos gerrier...@gmail.com:
 Hi, tnx for the reply!

 I started with Pd extented 0.41.4 (that's using Gem 0.91 I think) then
 I installed a file marked as gem-0.92.2-W32-i686.exe (fresh from
 http://gem.iem.at/) but if I look at the release notes in there it
 looks like 0.91 as well, but the .dll is a different size, so I assume
 the release notes are not up-to-date and I'm running 0.92.2.  Pd also
 prints out 0.92.2 when it starts up.  Sorry, no beer yet...

 Clock.avi comes standard with Windows XP at least.  Here's a copy:
 http://www.sendspace.com/file/smz01u

 Can't load alea.mpg with pix_film...just get an 'unable to open
 file...error.  Weird.

 Tried homer.avi, also leaks 8(

 Originally found the problem using my usb webcam and played around
 with the number of blobs quite a lot.  It always leaks when blobs are
 detected.  Probably not the webcam since it leaks with clock.avi and
 homer.avi as well.


 2010/3/14 IOhannes zmölnig zmoel...@iem.at:
 Gerrie Roos wrote:
 Hi!

 It looks like pix_multiblob is leaking about 4kB/frame/blob.  Anybody
 else seen this?  I'm in a bit of a tight spot.  I've got an
 installation coming up on 18 March and my extensive pd patch is now
 running out of memory every couple of hours.  Would love to check out
 the source code and try fix it myself but since I've never done any pd
 dev it will put me back a couple of days (at the least).  I'll buy you
 beer!

 Windows XP SP2
 Pd version 0.41.4-extended

 what Gem version is this?
 does the problem exist with the latest and greatest Gem (0.92.2)? (if
 not, i claim the beer :-))


 thanks for sending an example patch; it's pretty generic, and i do not
 see any memleak occuring here (using the alea.mpg example film).
 however, the bug might be related to the number of blobs found and the
 image format, neither of which i can reproduce;
 could you put the clock.avi online somewhere so i can download it?
 or: how does your patch behave with homer.avi?

 fmadrs
 IOhannes





___
Pd-dev mailing list
Pd-dev@iem.at
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev


Re: [PD-dev] pix_multiblob mem leak

2010-03-15 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-03-15 10:23, Gerrie Roos wrote:
 From the GemFAQ it appears that setting up a Windows build environment
 is a pain...should I even attempt to set up my own?  What's the
 chances of success within a couple of hours?

about 1% :-(

 
 2010/3/15 Gerrie Roos gerrier...@gmail.com:
 This is the first time looking at pd/gem code, so I might have it
 completely wrong, but the following looks suspicious:

 pix_multiblob.cpp:216:
  t_atom*ap = new t_atom[2+blobNumber*8];


indeed, this seems to be the trick.
you can have your beer yourself.

i will try to do a bugfix release within the next few days
(or at least send you an updated version)

fgmadsr
IOhannes



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
Pd-dev mailing list
Pd-dev@iem.at
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev


Re: [PD-dev] pix_multiblob mem leak

2010-03-14 Thread Gerrie Roos
Attached patch reproduces problem, reading video from file.

On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Gerrie Roos gerrier...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi!

 It looks like pix_multiblob is leaking about 4kB/frame/blob.  Anybody
 else seen this?  I'm in a bit of a tight spot.  I've got an
 installation coming up on 18 March and my extensive pd patch is now
 running out of memory every couple of hours.  Would love to check out
 the source code and try fix it myself but since I've never done any pd
 dev it will put me back a couple of days (at the least).  I'll buy you
 beer!

 Windows XP SP2
 Pd version 0.41.4-extended

 Gerrie



memleak.pd
Description: Binary data
___
Pd-dev mailing list
Pd-dev@iem.at
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev


Re: [PD-dev] pix_multiblob mem leak

2010-03-14 Thread IOhannes zmölnig
Gerrie Roos wrote:
 Hi!
 
 It looks like pix_multiblob is leaking about 4kB/frame/blob.  Anybody
 else seen this?  I'm in a bit of a tight spot.  I've got an
 installation coming up on 18 March and my extensive pd patch is now
 running out of memory every couple of hours.  Would love to check out
 the source code and try fix it myself but since I've never done any pd
 dev it will put me back a couple of days (at the least).  I'll buy you
 beer!
 
 Windows XP SP2
 Pd version 0.41.4-extended

what Gem version is this?
does the problem exist with the latest and greatest Gem (0.92.2)? (if
not, i claim the beer :-))


thanks for sending an example patch; it's pretty generic, and i do not
see any memleak occuring here (using the alea.mpg example film).
however, the bug might be related to the number of blobs found and the
image format, neither of which i can reproduce;
could you put the clock.avi online somewhere so i can download it?
or: how does your patch behave with homer.avi?

fmadrs
IOhannes



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Pd-dev mailing list
Pd-dev@iem.at
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev


Re: [PD-dev] pix_multiblob mem leak

2010-03-14 Thread Gerrie Roos
Hi, tnx for the reply!

I started with Pd extented 0.41.4 (that's using Gem 0.91 I think) then
I installed a file marked as gem-0.92.2-W32-i686.exe (fresh from
http://gem.iem.at/) but if I look at the release notes in there it
looks like 0.91 as well, but the .dll is a different size, so I assume
the release notes are not up-to-date and I'm running 0.92.2.  Pd also
prints out 0.92.2 when it starts up.  Sorry, no beer yet...

Clock.avi comes standard with Windows XP at least.  Here's a copy:
http://www.sendspace.com/file/smz01u

Can't load alea.mpg with pix_film...just get an 'unable to open
file...error.  Weird.

Tried homer.avi, also leaks 8(

Originally found the problem using my usb webcam and played around
with the number of blobs quite a lot.  It always leaks when blobs are
detected.  Probably not the webcam since it leaks with clock.avi and
homer.avi as well.


2010/3/14 IOhannes zmölnig zmoel...@iem.at:
 Gerrie Roos wrote:
 Hi!

 It looks like pix_multiblob is leaking about 4kB/frame/blob.  Anybody
 else seen this?  I'm in a bit of a tight spot.  I've got an
 installation coming up on 18 March and my extensive pd patch is now
 running out of memory every couple of hours.  Would love to check out
 the source code and try fix it myself but since I've never done any pd
 dev it will put me back a couple of days (at the least).  I'll buy you
 beer!

 Windows XP SP2
 Pd version 0.41.4-extended

 what Gem version is this?
 does the problem exist with the latest and greatest Gem (0.92.2)? (if
 not, i claim the beer :-))


 thanks for sending an example patch; it's pretty generic, and i do not
 see any memleak occuring here (using the alea.mpg example film).
 however, the bug might be related to the number of blobs found and the
 image format, neither of which i can reproduce;
 could you put the clock.avi online somewhere so i can download it?
 or: how does your patch behave with homer.avi?

 fmadrs
 IOhannes



___
Pd-dev mailing list
Pd-dev@iem.at
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev


[PD-dev] pix_multiblob mem leak

2010-03-13 Thread Gerrie Roos
Hi!

It looks like pix_multiblob is leaking about 4kB/frame/blob.  Anybody
else seen this?  I'm in a bit of a tight spot.  I've got an
installation coming up on 18 March and my extensive pd patch is now
running out of memory every couple of hours.  Would love to check out
the source code and try fix it myself but since I've never done any pd
dev it will put me back a couple of days (at the least).  I'll buy you
beer!

Windows XP SP2
Pd version 0.41.4-extended

Gerrie

___
Pd-dev mailing list
Pd-dev@iem.at
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev