[PD] clearing a delwrite~

2006-11-01 Thread hard off

is there any way to clear a delwrite~ object so that i don't get
unwanted feedback?  or pehaps another way to write a delayline that is
clearable?

___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] clearing a delwrite~

2006-11-01 Thread hard off

i made an fm synth that has a delay line on it,

and if i retrigger notes faster than the delay on the delay line, the
delay from the previous note bleeds into the new note.

this makes clicks when the 2 notes overlap.

i can think of a workaround, but if there would be a way to clear the
delayline it would be best,

___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] clearing a delwrite~

2006-11-01 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hallo,
hard off hat gesagt: // hard off wrote:

 i made an fm synth that has a delay line on it,
 
 and if i retrigger notes faster than the delay on the delay line, the
 delay from the previous note bleeds into the new note.

Maybe use more than one delayline and switch them with [poly]?

Ciao
-- 
 Frank Barknecht _ __footils.org_ __goto10.org__

___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] clearing a delwrite~

2006-11-01 Thread julien breval
Hello,

besides the solution provided by Frank, you can try these two things:

1. use two (or more) delay lines that are filled circularly.
Example for 4 lines. When you play a note, first use line #1. The following note
will be sent to line #2, the third to #3, the fourth to #4, the fifth to #1, etc

2. make a polyphonic synth in which each voice has its own delay line

on Max/MSP you can clear a delay line but you never know how many time it takes
so maybe it's not the best solution ...


hard off [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 i made an fm synth that has a delay line on it,

 and if i retrigger notes faster than the delay on the delay line, the
 delay from the previous note bleeds into the new note.

 this makes clicks when the 2 notes overlap.

 i can think of a workaround, but if there would be a way to clear the
 delayline it would be best,

 ___
 PD-list@iem.at mailing list
 UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
 http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list




___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] clearing a delwrite~

2006-11-01 Thread hard off

yeah i decided to go with the poly option.

still, it would be nice if there was a clear option for delwrite~

___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


[PD] pd-presets

2006-11-01 Thread rodrigo
hi all,

I made a small lib of abstractions to work with presets in pd (alternative
to memento) and thought to release it. It requires pd 0.39, the pool and
iemlib externals. A soundbank is also included, that has a built in
editor, featuring non-destructive editing.

If someone wants to give it a try, it's under:
http://rd.org.pe/code.php

If you find it usefull or have any comments, would be nice to hear from you!

cheers,

rodrigo

___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


[PD] [PD-announce] Nightly Windows Builds

2006-11-01 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner


It looks like finally the nightly windows builds of Pd-extended are  
working regularly.  pd-MAIN still needs work.  Try it out and report  
any problems.


http://autobuild.puredata.info/auto-build/latest/

The one big difference between the nightly Windows builds and the  
others is that Gem is not included.  That's a bigger project, since  
the nightly builds use MinGW to build, while none of the Gem devs use  
MinGW.


.hc



I have the audacity to believe that peoples everywhere can have three  
meals a day for their bodies, education and culture for their minds,  
and dignity, equality and freedom for their spirits.  - Martin  
Luther King, Jr.




___
PD-announce mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-announce

___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] [list length] counts unusual

2006-11-01 Thread Miller Puckette
Hmm, I think the design is, in fact, wrong.  But should I now fix it
(incompatibly)?  drat.

M

On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 11:10:57PM +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote:
 On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 23:04 +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
  Length in list-len.pd in the traditional way is calculated by
  serializing the list using [list split 1] and [list append], which
  drive a counter. I embedded it into the attached example as a
  subpatch. Here the conversion of meta-messages to list-messages is
  happening automatically as well, so this construct counts unlike [list
  length] as well.
 
 finally i understand, what you [list length] want to behave like. and in
 my eyes it makes a lot of sense now. from what you are saying i would
 also expect, that any [list]-object (besides [list trim]) prepends the
 list-selector to the incoming messages, but it doesn't here for whatever
 reason.
 
 roman
 
 
 
 
   
 ___ 
 Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
 
 
 ___
 PD-list@iem.at mailing list
 UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
 http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] [list length] counts unusual

2006-11-01 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hallo,
Miller Puckette hat gesagt: // Miller Puckette wrote:

 Hmm, I think the design is, in fact, wrong.  But should I now fix it
 (incompatibly)?  drat.

I think you should. I don't think many people have used the length
operation of [list] so far, as 0.40 still is quite new and there isn't
a pd-extended version of 0.40, so I'd guess it's not widely in use
yet. In fact, only those users, who explicitly wanted to count
*without* meta-selectors will have to adapt their patches and I guess
the number of users who wanted this is even smaller. So now's the
time for change!  ;)

Ciao
-- 
 Frank Barknecht _ __footils.org_ __goto10.org__

___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] [list length] counts unusual

2006-11-01 Thread Marius Schebella

Frank Barknecht schrieb:


I guess
the number of users who wanted this is even smaller. 


Or to say it in other words... the number is 1.

m.

___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


[PD] looking for good quality PV

2006-11-01 Thread Hector Centeno

Hello,

I was wondering if anyone knows of an external for good quality Phase
Vocoder analysis and re-synthesis. I've tried the fft example included
in PD and the quality is not really that good for extreme time
stretching (which I'm interested in doing). I've been using the PVOC
opcodes from Csound, which are of very good quality, but I would like
to know if there is anything available for PD with similar quality. I
know that I could modify the FFT example for making it sound better
but honestly I'm not that proficient in DSP.

Thank you!


Hector

___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] [list length] counts unusual

2006-11-01 Thread Mathieu Bouchard

On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Miller Puckette wrote:


Hmm, I think the design is, in fact, wrong.  But should I now fix it
(incompatibly)?  drat.


I think you should change it, because I doubt that anyone has found a use 
for the behaviour of [list length] that would be changed.


 _ _ __ ___ _  _ _ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju
| Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC Canada___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


[PD] pd dwatchdog: signaling pd...

2006-11-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
I am experiencing a very strange problem with pd. For a month I did 
not use pd and I did regular system updates and 
kernel recompiles. Today I have launched again pd, but it did not 
start up.. instead it spittes out  this strange stuff:

priority 98 scheduling enabled.
priority 96 scheduling enabled.
watchdog: signaling pd...
watchdog: signaling pd...
(when I don't run as root it just does not start up in a mute way)
...
the worst thing is that this problem persists even after I uninstall 
(make uninstall) and recompile the program...  
Any advice?

Thank you in advance,
Andrea Fiore


More Info:
I am running PD (0.40.1) on a Linux Gentoo x86 and I use the 2.6.17 
version of the Linux
kernel with the realtime module.
 


Naviga e telefona senza limiti con Tiscali 
Scopri le promozioni Tiscali adsl: navighi e telefoni senza canone Telecom

http://abbonati.tiscali.it/adsl/


___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] looking for good quality PV

2006-11-01 Thread patrick
maybe i am saying anything, but there's an external to link csound in pure 
data:

http://music.nuim.ie/musictec/csound/

so maybe you will be able to use your pvoc opcodes in pd.
patrick

___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list