Re: [PD] sending sound from pd to sc3?
if mac os, best to use soundflower 2014-03-20 17:55 GMT-03:00 mark hadman : > On 20 March 2014 15:43, lucrecio diaz wrote: > > Hi list, how can i send a signal from pd to sc3 ? > > > > I need to be able to receive the sound that pd is producing for > > processing in supercollider. > > > > any idea which is the best way of doing this? > > > > Linux / OSX / Windows / other ? > > ___ > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] [pix_opencv_facetracker]
[gemvertexbuffer] is a gem internal object, that means you can find the code in the Gem's tree : https://github.com/umlaeute/Gem/blob/master/src/Geos/gemvertexbuffer.cpp https://github.com/umlaeute/Gem/blob/master/src/Geos/gemvertexbuffer.h and it's buld with Gem there a nightly build server there : https://macosx105-i386.pdlab.puredata.info/job/template-libraries/label=macosx105-i386/ but it's down for a while (at least since july 2013) but think I have something somewhere that can help... I'll search for it tomorrow + a -- do it yourself http://antoine.villeret.free.fr 2014-03-21 21:23 GMT+01:00 Alexandros Drymonitis : > Do you have the source code? Maybe I can compile it for osx...Is there a > makefile with it? > > > On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 10:21 PM, Antoine Villeret < > antoine.ville...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I think the release you've download is the 0.93.3, which is the one >> shipped with Gem and don't include [gemvertexbuffer]. >> And unfortunately there is no more recent one. >> I have a [gemvertexbuffer] for Windows but not for Mac OS X. >> >> + >> a >> >> -- >> do it yourself >> http://antoine.villeret.free.fr >> >> >> 2014-03-21 21:07 GMT+01:00 Alexandros Drymonitis : >> >> Are you sure? I just downloaded Gem from Pd's website and it's still not >>> there.. >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Antoine Villeret < >>> antoine.ville...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> cool [gemvertexbuffer] was introduced just after the 0.93.3 release which is shipped with Pd-extended. And I don't know if there is some newer Gem binary available somewhere for Mac OS X. + a -- do it yourself http://antoine.villeret.free.fr 2014-03-21 20:31 GMT+01:00 Alexandros Drymonitis : Super! It's there and it works! Though I seem to be missing > [gemvertexbuffer] but I'll search for it. The help patch did it though, it > worked fine. Thanks! > > > On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Antoine Villeret < > antoine.ville...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> hi alex, >> >> thanks for the feedback >> could you try again with the newly uploaded archive ? >> http://puredata.info/downloads/pix_opencv/releases/0.2rc/view >> I've added [pix_opencv_facetracker], its help and a README.txt file. >> Please let me know if there are other issues. >> >> + >> a >> >> -- >> do it yourself >> http://antoine.villeret.free.fr >> >> >> 2014-03-21 9:19 GMT+01:00 Alexandros Drymonitis : >> >> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:43 AM, Antoine Villeret < >>> antoine.ville...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> hello, which archive did you download ? (for which OS) >>> I've downloaded the osx one and btw I can't find any readme. In the >>> package there is a 'model' directory which contains the following files: >>> face.con, face.tracker, face.tri and face2.tracker which sounds like >>> there >>> should be some face tracking there, but there's no >>> pix_opencv_facetracker.pd_darwin >>> >>> I didn't receive any feedback for this beta release and I've switch to a new version with lot's of improvement but it breaks some backward compatibility but I could manage to produce a [pix_opencv_facetracker] binary on deman btw, it's most likely a packaging issue because it was tested on 3 platforms + a -- do it yourself http://antoine.villeret.free.fr 2014-03-19 22:35 GMT+01:00 Alexandros Drymonitis : > Just downloaded the pix_opencv library from here > http://puredata.info/downloads/pix_opencv/releases/0.2rc/view and > it's supposed to include [pix_opencv_facetracker] but it actually > doesn't. > Is this a known issue? > > ___ > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > >>> >> > >>> >> > ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] [pix_opencv_facetracker]
Do you have the source code? Maybe I can compile it for osx...Is there a makefile with it? On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 10:21 PM, Antoine Villeret < antoine.ville...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think the release you've download is the 0.93.3, which is the one > shipped with Gem and don't include [gemvertexbuffer]. > And unfortunately there is no more recent one. > I have a [gemvertexbuffer] for Windows but not for Mac OS X. > > + > a > > -- > do it yourself > http://antoine.villeret.free.fr > > > 2014-03-21 21:07 GMT+01:00 Alexandros Drymonitis : > > Are you sure? I just downloaded Gem from Pd's website and it's still not >> there.. >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Antoine Villeret < >> antoine.ville...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> cool >>> >>> [gemvertexbuffer] was introduced just after the 0.93.3 release which is >>> shipped with Pd-extended. >>> And I don't know if there is some newer Gem binary available somewhere >>> for Mac OS X. >>> >>> + >>> a >>> >>> >>> -- >>> do it yourself >>> http://antoine.villeret.free.fr >>> >>> >>> 2014-03-21 20:31 GMT+01:00 Alexandros Drymonitis : >>> >>> Super! It's there and it works! Though I seem to be missing [gemvertexbuffer] but I'll search for it. The help patch did it though, it worked fine. Thanks! On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Antoine Villeret < antoine.ville...@gmail.com> wrote: > hi alex, > > thanks for the feedback > could you try again with the newly uploaded archive ? > http://puredata.info/downloads/pix_opencv/releases/0.2rc/view > I've added [pix_opencv_facetracker], its help and a README.txt file. > Please let me know if there are other issues. > > + > a > > -- > do it yourself > http://antoine.villeret.free.fr > > > 2014-03-21 9:19 GMT+01:00 Alexandros Drymonitis : > > >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:43 AM, Antoine Villeret < >> antoine.ville...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> hello, >>> >>> which archive did you download ? (for which OS) >>> >> I've downloaded the osx one and btw I can't find any readme. In the >> package there is a 'model' directory which contains the following files: >> face.con, face.tracker, face.tri and face2.tracker which sounds like >> there >> should be some face tracking there, but there's no >> pix_opencv_facetracker.pd_darwin >> >> >>> I didn't receive any feedback for this beta release and I've switch >>> to a new version with lot's of improvement but it breaks some backward >>> compatibility >>> but I could manage to produce a [pix_opencv_facetracker] binary on >>> deman >>> btw, it's most likely a packaging issue because it was tested on 3 >>> platforms >>> >>> + >>> a >>> >>> -- >>> do it yourself >>> http://antoine.villeret.free.fr >>> >>> >>> 2014-03-19 22:35 GMT+01:00 Alexandros Drymonitis : >>> Just downloaded the pix_opencv library from here http://puredata.info/downloads/pix_opencv/releases/0.2rc/view and it's supposed to include [pix_opencv_facetracker] but it actually doesn't. Is this a known issue? ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >>> >> > >>> >> > ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] [pix_opencv_facetracker]
I think the release you've download is the 0.93.3, which is the one shipped with Gem and don't include [gemvertexbuffer]. And unfortunately there is no more recent one. I have a [gemvertexbuffer] for Windows but not for Mac OS X. + a -- do it yourself http://antoine.villeret.free.fr 2014-03-21 21:07 GMT+01:00 Alexandros Drymonitis : > Are you sure? I just downloaded Gem from Pd's website and it's still not > there.. > > > On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Antoine Villeret < > antoine.ville...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> cool >> >> [gemvertexbuffer] was introduced just after the 0.93.3 release which is >> shipped with Pd-extended. >> And I don't know if there is some newer Gem binary available somewhere >> for Mac OS X. >> >> + >> a >> >> >> -- >> do it yourself >> http://antoine.villeret.free.fr >> >> >> 2014-03-21 20:31 GMT+01:00 Alexandros Drymonitis : >> >> Super! It's there and it works! Though I seem to be missing >>> [gemvertexbuffer] but I'll search for it. The help patch did it though, it >>> worked fine. Thanks! >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Antoine Villeret < >>> antoine.ville...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> hi alex, thanks for the feedback could you try again with the newly uploaded archive ? http://puredata.info/downloads/pix_opencv/releases/0.2rc/view I've added [pix_opencv_facetracker], its help and a README.txt file. Please let me know if there are other issues. + a -- do it yourself http://antoine.villeret.free.fr 2014-03-21 9:19 GMT+01:00 Alexandros Drymonitis : > > > On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:43 AM, Antoine Villeret < > antoine.ville...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> hello, >> >> which archive did you download ? (for which OS) >> > I've downloaded the osx one and btw I can't find any readme. In the > package there is a 'model' directory which contains the following files: > face.con, face.tracker, face.tri and face2.tracker which sounds like there > should be some face tracking there, but there's no > pix_opencv_facetracker.pd_darwin > > >> I didn't receive any feedback for this beta release and I've switch >> to a new version with lot's of improvement but it breaks some backward >> compatibility >> but I could manage to produce a [pix_opencv_facetracker] binary on >> deman >> btw, it's most likely a packaging issue because it was tested on 3 >> platforms >> >> + >> a >> >> -- >> do it yourself >> http://antoine.villeret.free.fr >> >> >> 2014-03-19 22:35 GMT+01:00 Alexandros Drymonitis : >> >>> Just downloaded the pix_opencv library from here >>> http://puredata.info/downloads/pix_opencv/releases/0.2rc/view and >>> it's supposed to include [pix_opencv_facetracker] but it actually >>> doesn't. >>> Is this a known issue? >>> >>> ___ >>> Pd-list@iem.at mailing list >>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >>> >>> >> > >>> >> > ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] [pix_opencv_facetracker]
cool [gemvertexbuffer] was introduced just after the 0.93.3 release which is shipped with Pd-extended. And I don't know if there is some newer Gem binary available somewhere for Mac OS X. + a -- do it yourself http://antoine.villeret.free.fr 2014-03-21 20:31 GMT+01:00 Alexandros Drymonitis : > Super! It's there and it works! Though I seem to be missing > [gemvertexbuffer] but I'll search for it. The help patch did it though, it > worked fine. Thanks! > > > On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Antoine Villeret < > antoine.ville...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> hi alex, >> >> thanks for the feedback >> could you try again with the newly uploaded archive ? >> http://puredata.info/downloads/pix_opencv/releases/0.2rc/view >> I've added [pix_opencv_facetracker], its help and a README.txt file. >> Please let me know if there are other issues. >> >> + >> a >> >> -- >> do it yourself >> http://antoine.villeret.free.fr >> >> >> 2014-03-21 9:19 GMT+01:00 Alexandros Drymonitis : >> >> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:43 AM, Antoine Villeret < >>> antoine.ville...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> hello, which archive did you download ? (for which OS) >>> I've downloaded the osx one and btw I can't find any readme. In the >>> package there is a 'model' directory which contains the following files: >>> face.con, face.tracker, face.tri and face2.tracker which sounds like there >>> should be some face tracking there, but there's no >>> pix_opencv_facetracker.pd_darwin >>> >>> I didn't receive any feedback for this beta release and I've switch to a new version with lot's of improvement but it breaks some backward compatibility but I could manage to produce a [pix_opencv_facetracker] binary on deman btw, it's most likely a packaging issue because it was tested on 3 platforms + a -- do it yourself http://antoine.villeret.free.fr 2014-03-19 22:35 GMT+01:00 Alexandros Drymonitis : > Just downloaded the pix_opencv library from here > http://puredata.info/downloads/pix_opencv/releases/0.2rc/view and > it's supposed to include [pix_opencv_facetracker] but it actually doesn't. > Is this a known issue? > > ___ > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > >>> >> > ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] [pix_opencv_facetracker]
Are you sure? I just downloaded Gem from Pd's website and it's still not there.. On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 9:53 PM, Antoine Villeret < antoine.ville...@gmail.com> wrote: > cool > > [gemvertexbuffer] was introduced just after the 0.93.3 release which is > shipped with Pd-extended. > And I don't know if there is some newer Gem binary available somewhere for > Mac OS X. > > + > a > > > -- > do it yourself > http://antoine.villeret.free.fr > > > 2014-03-21 20:31 GMT+01:00 Alexandros Drymonitis : > > Super! It's there and it works! Though I seem to be missing >> [gemvertexbuffer] but I'll search for it. The help patch did it though, it >> worked fine. Thanks! >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Antoine Villeret < >> antoine.ville...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> hi alex, >>> >>> thanks for the feedback >>> could you try again with the newly uploaded archive ? >>> http://puredata.info/downloads/pix_opencv/releases/0.2rc/view >>> I've added [pix_opencv_facetracker], its help and a README.txt file. >>> Please let me know if there are other issues. >>> >>> + >>> a >>> >>> -- >>> do it yourself >>> http://antoine.villeret.free.fr >>> >>> >>> 2014-03-21 9:19 GMT+01:00 Alexandros Drymonitis : >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:43 AM, Antoine Villeret < antoine.ville...@gmail.com> wrote: > hello, > > which archive did you download ? (for which OS) > I've downloaded the osx one and btw I can't find any readme. In the package there is a 'model' directory which contains the following files: face.con, face.tracker, face.tri and face2.tracker which sounds like there should be some face tracking there, but there's no pix_opencv_facetracker.pd_darwin > I didn't receive any feedback for this beta release and I've switch to > a new version with lot's of improvement but it breaks some backward > compatibility > but I could manage to produce a [pix_opencv_facetracker] binary on > deman > btw, it's most likely a packaging issue because it was tested on 3 > platforms > > + > a > > -- > do it yourself > http://antoine.villeret.free.fr > > > 2014-03-19 22:35 GMT+01:00 Alexandros Drymonitis : > >> Just downloaded the pix_opencv library from here >> http://puredata.info/downloads/pix_opencv/releases/0.2rc/view and >> it's supposed to include [pix_opencv_facetracker] but it actually >> doesn't. >> Is this a known issue? >> >> ___ >> Pd-list@iem.at mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >> >> > >>> >> > ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] [pix_opencv_facetracker]
Super! It's there and it works! Though I seem to be missing [gemvertexbuffer] but I'll search for it. The help patch did it though, it worked fine. Thanks! On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 6:01 PM, Antoine Villeret < antoine.ville...@gmail.com> wrote: > hi alex, > > thanks for the feedback > could you try again with the newly uploaded archive ? > http://puredata.info/downloads/pix_opencv/releases/0.2rc/view > I've added [pix_opencv_facetracker], its help and a README.txt file. > Please let me know if there are other issues. > > + > a > > -- > do it yourself > http://antoine.villeret.free.fr > > > 2014-03-21 9:19 GMT+01:00 Alexandros Drymonitis : > > >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:43 AM, Antoine Villeret < >> antoine.ville...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> hello, >>> >>> which archive did you download ? (for which OS) >>> >> I've downloaded the osx one and btw I can't find any readme. In the >> package there is a 'model' directory which contains the following files: >> face.con, face.tracker, face.tri and face2.tracker which sounds like there >> should be some face tracking there, but there's no >> pix_opencv_facetracker.pd_darwin >> >> >>> I didn't receive any feedback for this beta release and I've switch to a >>> new version with lot's of improvement but it breaks some backward >>> compatibility >>> but I could manage to produce a [pix_opencv_facetracker] binary on deman >>> btw, it's most likely a packaging issue because it was tested on 3 >>> platforms >>> >>> + >>> a >>> >>> -- >>> do it yourself >>> http://antoine.villeret.free.fr >>> >>> >>> 2014-03-19 22:35 GMT+01:00 Alexandros Drymonitis : >>> Just downloaded the pix_opencv library from here http://puredata.info/downloads/pix_opencv/releases/0.2rc/view and it's supposed to include [pix_opencv_facetracker] but it actually doesn't. Is this a known issue? ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >>> >> > ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] [pix_opencv_facetracker]
hi alex, thanks for the feedback could you try again with the newly uploaded archive ? http://puredata.info/downloads/pix_opencv/releases/0.2rc/view I've added [pix_opencv_facetracker], its help and a README.txt file. Please let me know if there are other issues. + a -- do it yourself http://antoine.villeret.free.fr 2014-03-21 9:19 GMT+01:00 Alexandros Drymonitis : > > > > On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:43 AM, Antoine Villeret < > antoine.ville...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> hello, >> >> which archive did you download ? (for which OS) >> > I've downloaded the osx one and btw I can't find any readme. In the > package there is a 'model' directory which contains the following files: > face.con, face.tracker, face.tri and face2.tracker which sounds like there > should be some face tracking there, but there's no > pix_opencv_facetracker.pd_darwin > > >> I didn't receive any feedback for this beta release and I've switch to a >> new version with lot's of improvement but it breaks some backward >> compatibility >> but I could manage to produce a [pix_opencv_facetracker] binary on deman >> btw, it's most likely a packaging issue because it was tested on 3 >> platforms >> >> + >> a >> >> -- >> do it yourself >> http://antoine.villeret.free.fr >> >> >> 2014-03-19 22:35 GMT+01:00 Alexandros Drymonitis : >> >>> Just downloaded the pix_opencv library from here >>> http://puredata.info/downloads/pix_opencv/releases/0.2rc/view and it's >>> supposed to include [pix_opencv_facetracker] but it actually doesn't. Is >>> this a known issue? >>> >>> ___ >>> Pd-list@iem.at mailing list >>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >>> >>> >> > ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] [OT] Raspberry Pi Wolfson Audio Card
nifty! On 21 Mar 2014, at 14:31, Winfried Ritsch wrote: > Am Freitag, 21. März 2014, 09:04:00 schrieb Simon Iten: >> hi, nice! one question: >> >> On 18 Mar 2014, at 12:02, Winfried Ritsch wrote: >>> Am Donnerstag, 13. März 2014, 16:01:20 schrieb Rafael Vega: Anyone wants to share their experience with the BeagleBoneBlack? >>> >>> Yes. >>> >>> Since autumn, i am trying to set up an kit hardware+software with BBB for >>> computer-musicians as stomp box, works quite well, after successfully >>> installed it in a long term sound installation (headless): >>> >>> some points short: >>> >>> system: >>> + BBB moved to Debian since this year (good) >>> + USB Audio works fine und better now with kernel >= 3.12 >>> + Network performance works better with kernel >= 3.12 >>> - IO support doenst use device-tree overlays anymore on kernel > 3.8 >>> + an iio-backend for Jack2 to use the internal AD's >>> >>> in jack for processing sensor data in PD ;-))) but tricky >> >> does this mean, we get a “sound” i.e adc~ in from the internal ad’s? >> > yes, so we use PD dsp-objects to process the data. but samplerate can be > different. > > mfg > winfried > > > -- > --- > Ritsch, Winfried, Ao.Univ.Prof. Dipl.-Ing. > Institut 17 Elektronische Musik und Akustik > 8010 Graz, Inffeldgasse 10/III > E-Mail rit...@iem.at > Homepagehttp://iem.at/ritsch > Mobil ++436642439369 > --- > > ___ > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] [OT] Raspberry Pi Wolfson Audio Card
Am Freitag, 21. März 2014, 09:04:00 schrieb Simon Iten: > hi, nice! one question: > > On 18 Mar 2014, at 12:02, Winfried Ritsch wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 13. März 2014, 16:01:20 schrieb Rafael Vega: > >> Anyone wants to share their experience with the BeagleBoneBlack? > > > > Yes. > > > > Since autumn, i am trying to set up an kit hardware+software with BBB for > > computer-musicians as stomp box, works quite well, after successfully > > installed it in a long term sound installation (headless): > > > > some points short: > > > > system: > > + BBB moved to Debian since this year (good) > > + USB Audio works fine und better now with kernel >= 3.12 > > + Network performance works better with kernel >= 3.12 > > - IO support doenst use device-tree overlays anymore on kernel > 3.8 > > + an iio-backend for Jack2 to use the internal AD's > > > > in jack for processing sensor data in PD ;-))) but tricky > > does this mean, we get a “sound” i.e adc~ in from the internal ad’s? > yes, so we use PD dsp-objects to process the data. but samplerate can be different. mfg winfried -- --- Ritsch, Winfried, Ao.Univ.Prof. Dipl.-Ing. Institut 17 Elektronische Musik und Akustik 8010 Graz, Inffeldgasse 10/III E-Mail rit...@iem.at Homepagehttp://iem.at/ritsch Mobil ++436642439369 --- ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] [pix_opencv_facetracker]
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:43 AM, Antoine Villeret < antoine.ville...@gmail.com> wrote: > hello, > > which archive did you download ? (for which OS) > I've downloaded the osx one and btw I can't find any readme. In the package there is a 'model' directory which contains the following files: face.con, face.tracker, face.tri and face2.tracker which sounds like there should be some face tracking there, but there's no pix_opencv_facetracker.pd_darwin > I didn't receive any feedback for this beta release and I've switch to a > new version with lot's of improvement but it breaks some backward > compatibility > but I could manage to produce a [pix_opencv_facetracker] binary on deman > btw, it's most likely a packaging issue because it was tested on 3 > platforms > > + > a > > -- > do it yourself > http://antoine.villeret.free.fr > > > 2014-03-19 22:35 GMT+01:00 Alexandros Drymonitis : > >> Just downloaded the pix_opencv library from here >> http://puredata.info/downloads/pix_opencv/releases/0.2rc/view and it's >> supposed to include [pix_opencv_facetracker] but it actually doesn't. Is >> this a known issue? >> >> ___ >> Pd-list@iem.at mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >> >> > ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] [OT] Raspberry Pi Wolfson Audio Card
hi, nice! one question: On 18 Mar 2014, at 12:02, Winfried Ritsch wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 13. März 2014, 16:01:20 schrieb Rafael Vega: >> Anyone wants to share their experience with the BeagleBoneBlack? >> > Yes. > > Since autumn, i am trying to set up an kit hardware+software with BBB for > computer-musicians as stomp box, works quite well, after successfully > installed it in a long term sound installation (headless): > > some points short: > > system: > + BBB moved to Debian since this year (good) > + USB Audio works fine und better now with kernel >= 3.12 > + Network performance works better with kernel >= 3.12 > - IO support doenst use device-tree overlays anymore on kernel > 3.8 > + an iio-backend for Jack2 to use the internal AD's > in jack for processing sensor data in PD ;-))) but tricky does this mean, we get a “sound” i.e adc~ in from the internal ad’s? > > sound: > > + down to 10ms with PD and cheap 8 channel out, 2 in > USB soundcard Logilink 7.1(EUR 19.90) > + 5ms with Logilink stereo USB (EUR 3,90) > + success with audio-cape (stereo, but too expensive for the quality) > - sound quality is normally as bad as on most notebooks, tablets and so on > + but with a trick: filtered 5V supply for the USB-card not the USB power > it seems to get reasonable quality > (They have all the same chips like expensive USB cards: C-Media) > > I just made a blog on this, but it is not public only for intern usage, if > anyone is interested in the IEM-embedded-Sound-Kit (doing some audio over > ethernet stuff) i can make it open (after some polishing, especially the > english) and release the PD-lib (GPIO,AD,I2C,... interfacing) for these > devices. > > This dev's should also work for Cubie-boards, Wand-boards, UDOO and other arm > based boards. > > mfg > winfried > > PS: Maybe we can start an own thread on this. > > > >> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Brian Fay wrote: >>> While I'm sure that Dan is right that the UDOO is the better choice for >>> USB audio, I do have to say that I've had decent success using my >>> Raspberry >>> Pi as a guitar effects processor, with the Behringer UCG102 interface. >>> >>> There's definitely a lot of quirkiness to getting it running... for >>> example ALSA gets in an infinite restart loop when attempting low latency >>> on pd-extended, but vanilla starts up fine under the same settings. And >>> then there's the fact that an issue in the kernel screws up USB audio on >>> major distros like Raspbian. >>> >>> I'm using the Satellite CCRMA distro right now with much better success. >>> So far I've got various delays, a looper, and a waveshaper distortion >>> running within the same patch, at <20ms latency with very few noticeable >>> dropouts. Parameters are adjustable with a QuNeo MIDI controller and with >>> a >>> button attached to the GPIO pins. >>> >>> The Pi is a bit more affordable than the UDOO boards, but then again I had >>> to buy a powered USB hub. Ultimately for one audio input the Raspberry Pi >>> could probably serve most purposes, while the UDOO is more likely to scale >>> to bigger installations. >>> >>> ___ >>> Pd-list@iem.at mailing list >>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > -- > --- > Ritsch, Winfried, Ao.Univ.Prof. Dipl.-Ing. > Institut 17 Elektronische Musik und Akustik > 8010 Graz, Inffeldgasse 10/III > E-Mailrit...@iem.at > Homepage http://iem.at/ritsch > Mobil ++436642439369 > --- > > > ___ > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
