Re: [PD] [GEM-dev] yet another gem w32 binary
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : > Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: >> >> I could say right now that this binary is in need of two dll's: >> >> msvcp71d.dll, and msvcr71d.dll >>> > > if you haven't yet installed these files, would you mind trying the > attached binary? > it has been compiled without debugging support, so the libs you > mention should not be needed. > > it has also been compiled with SSE2 support; if your machine does not > have SSE2 support and you experience problems, please tell me so. > if it doesn't have support and you DON'T experience problems, i would > be glad to hear this > I've removed the dll's from the system, and loaded this attached version, it's running fine, now I'm testing examples, from the last to the begining, oh an error: with examples/02.advanced/21.basic_LSystem.pd [gemlist]: you should not bang the gemlist now when I create gemwin, same error with doublehead example, 19.pointer, other examples are ok. ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] [GEM-dev] yet another gem w32 binary
IOhannes m zmölnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> I could say right now that this binary is in need of two dll's: >> >> msvcp71d.dll, and msvcr71d.dll > > aren't they part of XP already? > if not, i would suggest that they are to be downloaded from the wild > internet... > > or: do you have msvcp71.dll and msvcr71.dll (without the d's) installed > by default? > (a release version of Gem sh/c.ould be made dependent on these) > oops, I forgot to mention that I've tested this new release with windows vista, and they are not installed by default( xp doesn't know my dvdrom and some other devices). I've downloaded those DLL's indeed, and pasted them into windows/system32, so Gem can load, now I'm checking all available objects with my new hardware... cordially. ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] [GEM-dev] yet another gem w32 binary
hello, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : > i have finally managed to compile Gem on w32 with PBuffer (pix_vpaint) > and libfidtrack (aka reactivision) support). That sounds cool for building a reactable, also may I ask if you manage to add libfprint? > > this is the first complete Gem-built for w32 in years. > as i would like to issue a release asap, i ask all of you for testing > of this binary. > I could say right now that this binary is in need of two dll's: msvcp71d.dll, and msvcr71d.dll > > a zip-file containing the binary and up-to-date documentation is to be > found at: > http://gem.iem.at/releases/0.91/gem-CVS20080411-W32-i686-bin-doc.zip > > a binary-only (no docs or whatsoever) can be downloaded from > http://gem.iem.at/releases/0.91/gem-CVS20080411-W32-i686-bin.zip > > > happy patching Thank you! > fgmasdr > IOhannes > > > This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. > > > > ___ > GEM-dev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev > ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] [GEM-dev] new w32 binary!
Hi! IOhannes m zmoelnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > yesterday i have managed to compile Gem on W32 (surprisingly simple that > was) > Can I ask which compiler do you use on w32? > this version has been compiled with DirectShow9 and QuickTime7.2 support. > support for tablets has been further removed. > I guess they have to be both installed for having Gem loading. > please test and report any bugs. > > Thank you, I'll give many tries! ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] Simple PD GUI enhancement - like Max Toolbox
Batuhan Bozkurt a écrit : > Hello, > > I've made the switch from Max/MSP to PD 1-1.5 years ago right before I > switched my OS to linux and I'm loving almost every moment of it. But > there is only one thing I got used to while I was using Max and after > all those months of PD programming, I still miss that feature that was > made possible with a js addition called "max toolbox". > > Thanks, > Batuhan hello, you might be interested about this: http://www.piksel.no/pwiki/DesireData in fact I believe after a discussion with a max user that the macro feature of desiredata makes it better than max with toolbox. ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] polyWaveSynth issue
Kyle Klipowicz a écrit : > Until then, we just can't really expect the same crowd that > Pd-extended is marketed for to know much about cvs and setting up the > paths and stuff. It's better to take the high road and avoid elitist > isolationism and make things easy as possible for new users to dive > into: Pd needs adherents to thrive and become a serious competitor of > similar commercial options. > ~Kyle My one half cent, everytime I give some try to a new pd-extended it messes up all my pd stand-alone applications because of the freaking pdsettings, that is installed by default, without giving user choice for installing this evil file or not. ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
