Re: [PD] Archlinux packages
Fero Kiraly wrote: ok. I get working pd-vanilla, pdx, pd-l2ork on one archlinux system. For git, you can use the following construct in the PKGBUILD so you don't have to delete and clone again on successive builds: #download pd-l2ork msg Looking for pd2lork on git ... cd $srcdir if [ -d pd-l2ork ] ; then cd pd-l2ork git pull cd .. msg The local files are updated. else git clone git://github.com/pd-l2ork/pd.git $pkgname fi msg done #download Gem cd $pkgname msg Looking for gem on git if [ -d Gem ] ; then cd Gem git pull cd .. msg The local files are updated. else git clone git://pd-gem.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/pd-gem/Gem Gem fi msg done ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] Archlinux packages (was: enhance...)
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 7:31 AM, Fero Kiraly fero.kir...@gmail.com wrote: ok. I get working pd-vanilla, pdx, pd-l2ork on one archlinux system. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pd-l2ork/ Fantastic that you've made these available. Thanks a lot. Unfortunately, the build for pd-l2ork is failing for me at the disis_wiimote build stage. I can post the errors if you like but I suspect the build fails because disis_wiimote requires the pd-l2ork vesion of cwiid. For now I 'll try building without disis_wiimote, but it is something I would like to use so that's not an ideal solution. I was wondering how you have been able to successfully build pd-l2ork with this external included, since the PKGBUILD does not download the required cwiid tarball or attempt to build it so far as I can tell. thanks again Michael ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] Archlinux packages (was: enhance...)
honestly I dont know where could be problem with compiling disis wiimote, on my system it builds. I just tried example disis_wiimote-help.pd and the object is not available. In console are errors: /usr/lib/pd-l2ork/extra/disis_wiimote.pd_linux: /usr/lib/pd-l2ork/extra/disis_wiimote.pd_linux: undefined symbol: cwiid_toggle_passthrough_mode disis_wiimote ... couldn't create /usr/lib/pd-l2ork/extra/disis_wiimote.pd_linux: /usr/lib/pd-l2ork/extra/disis_wiimote.pd_linux: undefined symbol: cwiid_toggle_passthrough_mode disis_wiimote 00:19:1D:BE:6A:66 ... couldn't create /usr/lib/pd-l2ork/extra/disis_wiimote.pd_linux: /usr/lib/pd-l2ork/extra/disis_wiimote.pd_linux: undefined symbol: cwiid_toggle_passthrough_mode disis_wiimote ... couldn't create /usr/lib/pd-l2ork/extra/disis_wiimote.pd_linux: /usr/lib/pd-l2ork/extra/disis_wiimote.pd_linux: undefined symbol: cwiid_toggle_passthrough_mode disis_wiimote 00:19:1D:BE:6A:66 ... couldn't create ??? fk. ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] Archlinux packages (was: enhance...)
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Fero Kiraly fero.kir...@gmail.com wrote: honestly I dont know where could be problem with compiling disis wiimote, on my system it builds. I just tried example disis_wiimote-help.pd and the object is not available. In console are errors: /usr/lib/pd-l2ork/extra/disis_wiimote.pd_linux: /usr/lib/pd-l2ork/extra/disis_wiimote.pd_linux: undefined symbol: cwiid_toggle_passthrough_mode disis_wiimote ... couldn't create /usr/lib/pd-l2ork/extra/disis_wiimote.pd_linux: /usr/lib/pd-l2ork/extra/disis_wiimote.pd_linux: undefined symbol: cwiid_toggle_passthrough_mode disis_wiimote 00:19:1D:BE:6A:66 ... couldn't create /usr/lib/pd-l2ork/extra/disis_wiimote.pd_linux: /usr/lib/pd-l2ork/extra/disis_wiimote.pd_linux: undefined symbol: cwiid_toggle_passthrough_mode disis_wiimote ... couldn't create /usr/lib/pd-l2ork/extra/disis_wiimote.pd_linux: /usr/lib/pd-l2ork/extra/disis_wiimote.pd_linux: undefined symbol: cwiid_toggle_passthrough_mode disis_wiimote 00:19:1D:BE:6A:66 ... couldn't create ??? fk. On the l2ork website it states that there is a specific build of cwiid needed that is downloadable from the site. Ivica mentioned something about this in an earlier email as well, so I suspect it is the cause of the issue. ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] Archlinux packages (was: enhance...)
maybe should be packaged as cwid-pd-l2ork. I have no time now. fk. 2013/2/9 michael noble loop...@gmail.com On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Fero Kiraly fero.kir...@gmail.com wrote: honestly I dont know where could be problem with compiling disis wiimote, on my system it builds. I just tried example disis_wiimote-help.pd and the object is not available. In console are errors: /usr/lib/pd-l2ork/extra/disis_wiimote.pd_linux: /usr/lib/pd-l2ork/extra/disis_wiimote.pd_linux: undefined symbol: cwiid_toggle_passthrough_mode disis_wiimote ... couldn't create /usr/lib/pd-l2ork/extra/disis_wiimote.pd_linux: /usr/lib/pd-l2ork/extra/disis_wiimote.pd_linux: undefined symbol: cwiid_toggle_passthrough_mode disis_wiimote 00:19:1D:BE:6A:66 ... couldn't create /usr/lib/pd-l2ork/extra/disis_wiimote.pd_linux: /usr/lib/pd-l2ork/extra/disis_wiimote.pd_linux: undefined symbol: cwiid_toggle_passthrough_mode disis_wiimote ... couldn't create /usr/lib/pd-l2ork/extra/disis_wiimote.pd_linux: /usr/lib/pd-l2ork/extra/disis_wiimote.pd_linux: undefined symbol: cwiid_toggle_passthrough_mode disis_wiimote 00:19:1D:BE:6A:66 ... couldn't create ??? fk. On the l2ork website it states that there is a specific build of cwiid needed that is downloadable from the site. Ivica mentioned something about this in an earlier email as well, so I suspect it is the cause of the issue. -- Fero Kiraly www.cluster-ensemble.com ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] Archlinux packages (was: enhance...)
Hi,
thanks.
Here's a PKGBUILD for pdsend/pdreceive alone, duplicating how debian
packages are organized.
Now it would be a good thing to have the pd, pd-extended and pd-l2ork
drop these two binaries, so there are almost nothing left in conflict.
And also have pd-l2ork install in /usr, not /usr/local.
Cheers,
Charles
Fero Kiraly wrote:
I just now updated archlinux packages.
pd-l2ork now installs to /usr/local... so that prevent collision to pd-ext.
# $Id:$
# Maintainer : to be found
pkgname=puredata-utils
pkgver=0.44.2
_ver=${pkgver%.*}-${pkgver##*.}
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc=pdsend and pdreceive for Pure Data
arch=('i686' 'x86_64')
url=http://crca.ucsd.edu/~msp/software.html;
license=('custom:BSD')
optdepends=('puredata')
source=(http://crca.ucsd.edu/~msp/Software/pd-$_ver.src.tar.gz;)
md5sums=('629ba1ba04d3db29874ea6902c94f9f0')
build() {
cd $srcdir/pd-$_ver/src
gcc -o pdsend u_pdsend.c
gcc -o pdreceive u_pdreceive.c
}
package() {
install -Dm755 $srcdir/pd-$_ver/src/pdsend $pkgdir/usr/bin/pdsend
install -Dm755 $srcdir/pd-$_ver/src/pdreceive $pkgdir/usr/bin/pdreceive
install -Dm644 $srcdir/pd-$_ver/man/pdsend.1
$pkgdir/usr/man/man1/pdsend.1
install -Dm644 $srcdir/pd-$_ver/man/pdreceive.1
$pkgdir/usr/man/man1/pdreceive.1
install -Dm644 $srcdir/pd-$_ver/LICENSE.txt
$pkgdir/usr/share/licenses/pd-utils/LICENSE
}
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] Archlinux packages (was: enhance...)
nice ;) we are on the way.. I think am am able to do the rest.. fk. ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] Archlinux packages (was: enhance...)
ok. I am preparing the new packages for pd, pdx, pdl and I met some errors. I have removed pdsend pdreceive also with man pages from pdx. When installing pd vanilla I ve encounter conflicting files: puredata: /usr/bin/pd-gui.tcl exists in filesystem puredata: /usr/include/m_pd.h exists in filesystem puredata: /usr/include/pa_jack.h exists in filesystem puredata: /usr/include/pa_linux_alsa.h exists in filesystem puredata: /usr/include/portaudio.h exists in filesystem puredata: /usr/lib/libportaudio.a exists in filesystem puredata: /usr/lib/libportaudio.so exists in filesystem puredata: /usr/lib/libportaudio.so.2 exists in filesystem puredata: /usr/lib/libportaudio.so.2.0.0 exists in filesystem what with them ? thanks for help. fk. ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] Archlinux packages (was: enhance...)
Fero Kiraly wrote: ok. I am preparing the new packages for pd, pdx, pdl and I met some errors. I have removed pdsend pdreceive also with man pages from pdx. When installing pd vanilla I ve encounter conflicting files: puredata: /usr/bin/pd-gui.tcl exists in filesystem puredata: /usr/include/m_pd.h exists in filesystem puredata: /usr/include/pa_jack.h exists in filesystem puredata: /usr/include/pa_linux_alsa.h exists in filesystem puredata: /usr/include/portaudio.h exists in filesystem puredata: /usr/lib/libportaudio.a exists in filesystem puredata: /usr/lib/libportaudio.so exists in filesystem puredata: /usr/lib/libportaudio.so.2 exists in filesystem puredata: /usr/lib/libportaudio.so.2.0.0 exists in filesystem what with them ? thanks for help. with pacman -Qo file you can tell which package owns a file. For /usr/include and /usr/lib, I'll say they should be in /usr/include(lib)/pd-extended/ for example. For pd-gui.tcl it's more tricky I guess. It may need a archlinux-centric patch. Thanks, Charles ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] Archlinux packages (was: enhance...)
On 02/08/2013 07:14 PM, Charles Goyard wrote: Fero Kiraly wrote: ok. I am preparing the new packages for pd, pdx, pdl and I met some errors. I have removed pdsend pdreceive also with man pages from pdx. When installing pd vanilla I ve encounter conflicting files: puredata: /usr/bin/pd-gui.tcl exists in filesystem puredata: /usr/include/m_pd.h exists in filesystem puredata: /usr/include/pa_jack.h exists in filesystem puredata: /usr/include/pa_linux_alsa.h exists in filesystem puredata: /usr/include/portaudio.h exists in filesystem puredata: /usr/lib/libportaudio.a exists in filesystem puredata: /usr/lib/libportaudio.so exists in filesystem puredata: /usr/lib/libportaudio.so.2 exists in filesystem puredata: /usr/lib/libportaudio.so.2.0.0 exists in filesystem portaudio files (libportaudio*, pa_*) should definitely _not_ be installed by any pd package. you should try to use your system's portaudio, rather than the one Pd comes with. as for Pd's include file(s): install to /usr/include/pdflavour/ /usr/include/m_pd.h may (probably should) be kept for compat reasons, and i think that it should belong to pd-vanilla. (but then: afaik m_pd.h from pd-vanilla and pd-extended don't differ in any practical sense; with pd-l2ork this might be different) fgmadr IOhannes ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] Archlinux packages
On 02/08/2013 04:14 PM, IOhannes zmölnig wrote: On 02/08/2013 07:14 PM, Charles Goyard wrote: Fero Kiraly wrote: ok. I am preparing the new packages for pd, pdx, pdl and I met some errors. I have removed pdsend pdreceive also with man pages from pdx. When installing pd vanilla I ve encounter conflicting files: puredata: /usr/bin/pd-gui.tcl exists in filesystem puredata: /usr/include/m_pd.h exists in filesystem puredata: /usr/include/pa_jack.h exists in filesystem puredata: /usr/include/pa_linux_alsa.h exists in filesystem puredata: /usr/include/portaudio.h exists in filesystem puredata: /usr/lib/libportaudio.a exists in filesystem puredata: /usr/lib/libportaudio.so exists in filesystem puredata: /usr/lib/libportaudio.so.2 exists in filesystem puredata: /usr/lib/libportaudio.so.2.0.0 exists in filesystem portaudio files (libportaudio*, pa_*) should definitely _not_ be installed by any pd package. you should try to use your system's portaudio, rather than the one Pd comes with. as for Pd's include file(s): install to /usr/include/pdflavour/ /usr/include/m_pd.h may (probably should) be kept for compat reasons, and i think that it should belong to pd-vanilla. (but then: afaik m_pd.h from pd-vanilla and pd-extended don't differ in any practical sense; with pd-l2ork this might be different) /usr/include/m_pd.h should definitely stay and definitely be from pd-vanilla. Pd-extended's has some differences, including the version macros i.e. TEST version. .hc ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] Archlinux packages (was: enhance...)
ok. I get working pd-vanilla, pdx, pd-l2ork on one archlinux system. All in /usr/lib/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pd-vanilla/ - vanilla version (cannot rename to puredata, because on official repos is package with the same name) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pd-extended/ - binary is named 'pdextended' I think maybe it could be pdx ? https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pd-l2ork/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/puredata-utils/ - pdsend, pdreceive what is missing is 'cyclone', it should be installed separately, but I dont have energy for that. install all with: yaourt -S pd-vanilla pd-extended pd-l2ork puredata-utils You can check for errors. fk. ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
